Should Confederate monuments be torn down in the United States? Some people believe that they should not be torn down because of the slippery slope argument, meaning that lots of leaders had wrongs too, and we would have to tear theirs down if we tear down the Confederate ones. Others believe that they should be torn down because of two reasons. The first reason is that the previously discussed leaders’ rights outweigh their wrongs. The second reason is that the Confederate monuments honor a racist ideology. Evidence more strongly supports that these monuments should be torn down. Some believe that Confederate monuments should not be torn down because of the slippery slope argument. President Donald Trump said, “So, this week it’s Robert …show more content…
Ilya Somen, a writer for the Washington Post, said in response to Trump's argument, "But the Founders deserve commemoration because their complicity in slavery was outweighed by other, more positive achievements" (3). What Somen is saying is that the Founders did so many things that should be honored, and the offense of owning slaves shouldn’t take away their recognition. But, the Confederate leaders' achievements were all for the Confederacy, which means that all of the “good” they did wasn’t truly good. For example, George Washington was our first president and did so much for our nation, but he owned slaves. Obviously, owning slaves is bad, but he should still be honored for his role in our country because it was mostly good. On the other hand, Confederate leaders like Robert E. Lee didn’t really do positive things, other than for the Confederacy. Because the Confederate leaders’ rights don’t outweigh their wrongs, their monuments should be torn …show more content…
James W. Loewen, a writer for Southern Exposure Magazine, said, "Consider "defense of principles believed fundamental." Three weeks before the Confederacy attacked Sumter, Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens said what these were: "Our new government's foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the Negro is not equal to the white man, that slavery--subordination to the superior race--is his natural and normal condition." UDC leaders doubtless hoped that if they left those principles vague, readers might infer something nobler." (1). What Loewen is saying is that the Confederacy and its leaders believed that white people were the superior race. For example, the Confederacy was founded to protect the practice of slavery, and slavery is obviously racist towards African Americans. Because these monuments honor a racist ideology, they should be torn
In Atlanta Ga, Charlottesville Nc, and in every other formerly Confederate State in the U.S. there has been controversial debates on whether or not the current standing Confederate statues should be removed from public areas. Many people claim that a modern society should not honor the racist soldiers who fought for slavery. Others believe that preserving historical accuracy is essential to learning from the mistakes of the past. The opinions of thousands of citizens clash with one another over the debate between offense and information. I believe that it is most beneficial for the majority of people if the current Confederate monuments remain where they are.
Although, we have to “come to the table of democracy as equals.” The statues represent a time when not everyone was equal or treated equally. Mitch Landrieu uses pathos to encourage us to unite and remove the monuments. To achieve “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,”
On March 21, 1861 The state of Louisiana joined The Confederate States of America, on April 12, 1861 The American Civil War started and didn't end until four years later on, May 9, 1865 until The Union States of America won. The year is currently 2017 one hundred and fifty-two years since The American Civil War and Robert E. Lee a General in The Confederate army, Jefferson Davis who was the President of The Confederate States and P.G.T. Beauregard a Military officer in the Confederate states, whose monuments were all still up until four months ago they were taken down. The person responsible for removing the statues is Mayor Landrieu of New Orleans, Louisiana he expressed a movable speech to the people of New Orleans and the citizens and noncitizens
In light of recent events in our country, there has been no better time in our history than the present to illustrate how Madison was a visionary in supporting the Constitution via his Federalist Number 10 argument. The removal or defacement of Confederate statues by those other than government employees is prime example of his argument. Despite the sometimes illegal removal and resultant damage, the persons responsible continue to wreak havoc in local communities and do not appear to be suffering any consequences from the federal government. National polls conducted just last month revealed a majority of Americans do not approve of removing Confederate monuments. In spite of this, statues have been removed and damage caused to them by
Lee was a Confederate General during the Civil War. He fought for all of the slavery, Injustice, and oppression going on in America at that time. Many Americans already felt as if the statue was outdated and should be taken down. A common argument was that the Nazis took their statues and murals down later on in their history. That being said during the Black Lives Matter movement it was powerful to put graffiti on the statue.
People that defend keeping the Confederate history backs it up by connecting American and Confederate history together with four facts the Article of Confederation, Presidents of the United States, the Reformation, and the Secession Treaty. Once the United State became whole after the Civil War,
The symbols that people want to take down shows who had the power and what they have done and why it is so important. An example would be that Robert E Lee was a general that had made a large impact on all of us. That 's why we should keep them then tear them down, That way we can learn about what that person has done. A reason why people want to take them down would be because they feel offended about that statue.
Monuments of Confederacy The Confederate monuments should be a thing of the past and torn down. “The statues were built to honor the Confederacy and maintain the idea that whites are superior to other races. ”(Landrieu, 2) Statutes are not designed to simply remember our history, but the statues purpose is to honor and venerate the person or idea it represents. These statues honor the idea that slavery was ok.
Civil War Monuments The Confederate monuments from the Civil War in many cities, colleges, and universities are being asked to be taken down. The monuments are causing problems between the U.S. citizens. Many people are protesting and saying that the monuments are a symbol of racism, and symbolism of traitors to the U.S., and are used to show white supremacy. These monuments should be taken down from the public but they should not be destroyed.
When a flag is presented in a rival that brings hate and discontent to America it should be removed from being displayed. I strongly am offended of the Confederate flag and my opinion is a lot of others are also offended. The constant reminder of the mistreatment and enslavement of the black race is still being suffered by black people today. The confederate flag brings grief to my heart as my ancestors were subjected to slavery.
Should Cities Be Allowed To Take Down Confederate Statues? What do you think about Confederate Statues? Should cities and governments be allowed to take these statues down? The city of New Orleans had this problem.
In the news today, a continual debate can be found about the significance of Confederate monuments and if they should remain or be removed. Confederate monuments that have been erected throughout the U.S. should be kept because of the preservation of America’s history. For instance, in the article, The Unbearable Lightness of Confederate-Statue Removal, the author lists how slaveholder monuments aren’t the only statues being vandalized, but the Lincoln Memorial and Mount Rushmore are other symbols of U.S. history that some believe need to “blow up” (Murdock). Every historical symbol can have both people who appreciate it and who oppose it. That doesn’t mean that we should tear down all symbols, but
There was a politically correct remembrance of the Confederacy in that men felt so strongly about their beliefs they were willing to wage war and die for them, many felt that should be honored. My own understanding of the South’s passion with the Civil War is much like Tony Horwitz, In that the War is so intriguing and interesting because it involves the country I live in and the beliefs that are so passionately felt to this day. Born and raised in California I believed racism to be dead and the surprise I received moving to the panhandle of Texas was discomforting. The Civil War has a unique way of luring
Should monuments be removed? For many years people have been arguing whether certain controversial monuments, such as statues, should be destroyed or removed. A common type of monuments in this situation are the Confederacy monuments. These are various statues across the US which honor Confederate leaders or “heroes”. Many see these offensive since those people basically oppressed African Americans for years and were fighting to keep doing so.
It is vacuous to think that my statue should be taken down when there are an abundance of contentious statues that still stand ground today. For example, Jefferson Davis has ten statues that still stand in America. Jefferson Davis was an American politician who fulfilled the position of president for the Confederate States. He was