Regardless of these expectations, the government still denies that, ”An execution is a violent public spectacle of official homicide, and one that endorses killing to solve social problems” (ACLU). The death penalty 's violence does not coincide with societal belief that killing is an immoral act. The death penalty is ironic in that sense, because it is euthanizing a human under the guise of rationality. The death penalty is a hypocrisy of society 's expectations of a good citizen, because they are promoting and endorsing this act to solve and diminish the crime in the world. However, society continues to endorse this act of immorality by insisting that, “Governments
Death Penalty is a very ominous punishment to discuss. It is probably the most controversial and feared form of punishment in the United States. Many are unaware, but 31 of the 52 states have the Death penalty passes as an acceptable punishment. In the following essay, I will agree and support Stephen Nathanson's statement that "Equality retributivism cannot justify the death penalty." In the reading, "An Eye for an Eye?
In the essay “The Death Penalty Is a Step Back” the author, Coretta Scott King expresses her feelings about capital punishment and states reasons to back up her argument that the death penalty is both a racist and immoral practice. King believes that capital punishment is immoral and illegal, and that it by no means serves as a deterrent for other possible criminals. The author then further talks about how there have been numerous incidents where the mistakenly convicted is put down in the name of American justice. King then argues that by sentencing someone to death, one is assuming that the person convicted is not capable of rehabilitation. The
The death penalty by the State institutionalizes the death penalty that already exists on the part of criminals, therefore when the state decides to kill, takes on a right that denies its citizens. Consequently, the death penalty is a contradiction by the State. Also, the death penalty is not effective because it does not reduce crime. The criminal does not think about the consequence ate the time of committing the crime; proof is that he commits his crimes thinking that will not be punished. As said by a police lieutenant in Kansas, "I have never heard a murderer say they thought about the death penalty as consequence of their actions prior to committing their crimes."
They also think that they should have to pay for their actions and face the consequences for killing an innocent person or people. Although giving someone a life sentence is a financial burden for the state that the person is being held in, most americans feel it's something they are willing to pay extra for on taken to ensure the safety of their homes and where they live. When holding someone on death row it costs the state over 1 million dollars per person and that money is usually taken out of taxes or government money. Over all death penalty supporters feel like keeping a killer alive with there tax money isn't fair to them and they shouldn't get the satisfaction of living their own life even if its a crappy one cause they took that from somebody
Not all capital crimes deserve death. The sentence should be tailored to the offense done by an individual (Novak, 2013). Humans always make mistakes. Judges and Juries are human and that does not mean that they will not make mistake while they make their judgement on an offender. Dhillon, Mohammad and Ng (2012) state that although most of the capital crimes require sensible evidence before a person is sentence to death, it does not guarantee that no mistakes when a conviction is make.
“On the other hand, a person who commits a murder or a rape knows that they are risking their freedom, which can serve as a powerful deterrent” (Apecsecadmin). In the same way, the death penalty can also serve as an extremely powerful deterrent. If other criminals see that this is happening, and they are heading in the direction of committing the same crimes, it might make them rethink what they are doing if they know there is a potential risk of receiving the death penalty. Canada abolished the death penalty 1976. Twenty seven years after the abolishment, Canada saw a 44 per cent drop in murders across the country (“5
Once a prisoner is killed, nothing can be change to make amends if mistake has been made. There is considerable proof that many mistakes have been made in sentencing people to death. Since 1973, at least 156 peoples have been freed after evidence found that they were sentenced to die for crimes they did not commit (NBC 2013). According to Eckholm.E et al (2014), Henry McCollum and Leon Brown were put in jail and waiting sentence to die in 1983 for killing and raping a 11 year old Sabrina Bluie in 1983. After thirty years, they were wrongfully convicted for the crime according to DNA evidence.
Even though the death penalty may seem like a way to help victims and make criminals suffer, it is not effective. It does more harm than good. One reason is that the death penalty is not allowing the offender to suffer. If the inmate lacks remorse and doesn 't care if he or she dies or not, how is killing them is teaching them that killing is wrong. In some cases, living a life with no freedom and isolation are worse than living at all.
Today, I Barbara Teller, will inform you all on why the death penalty should be abolished. Some of you may not be aware that the death penalty still exists in multiple countries, and others may support it. But yes, it is a thing and one that more people should be involved in. My son was put to death for the 1992 murder of 70-year-old John Watson of Covington. But no hard evidence had proven he was at the scene of the crime.