“The mode of appointment of the Chief Magistrate of the United States … I venture somewhat further, and hesitate not to affirm that if the manner of it be not perfect, it is at least excellent” --Alexander Hamilton. Our contemporary presidential election system is referred as the electoral college, which provides the president to be determined by the candidate which receives the majority of the electoral votes. Furthermore, the electoral college has been persistently disputed whether it should be kept or eliminated, being there are various proponents that oppose it stating it goes against the will of the people or is undemocratic. However, the electoral college promotes candidates to build campaign platform for the national interest, thus …show more content…
Others may think their votes go wasted, due to the “winner-takes-all” method in use for the majority of states, such as a voter voting for Al Gore might of believed in the election of 2000, being Bush won the majority of electoral votes while Gore won the popular vote. However, it is erroneous to believe their votes go wasted, being they were simply cast on the losing side of the popular vote within the state, even more provided by the electoral college which preserves federalism by representing states as evenly as possible, thus protecting small states it does not waste votes being it grants all states a justifiable amount of electoral votes in correspondence with their population. In addition, if it was based on national popular vote only, would people assert that their vote for Bush went wasted, as a result of Gore’s victory? Furthermore, the electoral college preserves federalism by promoting a national consensus on our choice for president, being it leads to candidates seeking national coalition, thus enabling them to win with the majority of electoral votes and eliciting the correct president to maintain stability in the union. Although, some may say the electoral college is undemocratic or goes against the will of the people, being a candidate might win presidency as a result of the majority of electoral votes but have less popular votes than the opposing candidate. However, our Founding Fathers did not intended a pure democracy, being a pure democracy is not universally good, due to it leads to tyranny of the majority and rejects compromise which could damage the union. Thus, the electoral college has proven to be operating effectively for more than 200 years, due to our Founding Fathers created an efficacious, carefully designed election system through vigorous debate and deliberation. Altogether, the electoral college should be preserved, due to it
The Electoral College does not accurately align with the ways of a Democratic society. The idea of ‘Democracy’ was different when the Constitution was created and as an ever-changing country, we must establish laws that fit our time period and put an end to the ones that don’t. Presidents being elected despite losing the popular vote goes against the definition of democracy according to Oxford Languages, “Control
I think we should keep the Electoral College. Electoral College is defined in our textbook as; “An unofficial term that refers to the electors who cast the states’ electoral votes” (Patterson, T.E., 2013). Electoral voting is tied in with the states popular voting. Choosing electoral college adds to the cohesiveness of the nation by obliging an appropriation of popular support to be elected President, improves the status of minority interests, contributes to the political dependability of the country by promising a two-party system, and keeps up an elected arrangement of government and representation (Kimberling, W.C., 2008). I think that the Electoral College system is a big part of the cohesiveness of our country and it requires the distribution
The electoral college can either be abolished or changed. With it being abolished all the power would go straight the American citizens, if changed it will allow the smaller states to have a say. By changing the electoral college system it will allow representatives of the people, smaller states
A single citizen’s vote really does not matter. The Electoral College has been around since 1787 has a part of the Constitution. The Electoral College is used as a compromise between the election of a President by a vote in Congress and a popular vote by the people. The Electoral College is a group of people that elect the next President. The Electoral College should not be changed or abolished, but kept the same.
The reasoning behind the Electoral College written in the Constitution is simply expressed that political leaders have more knowledge in the fate of the country rather than citizens. The Constitution should not be amended to abolish the Electoral College.
The Electoral College is a system of voting created by the writers of the Constitution. The main goal of the Electoral College was to ensure that the citizens of the United States could not elect the president directly. The writers of the Constitution believed that the voters would not be properly educated on who they were voting for and consequently make a poor choice. The Electoral College is no longer in need today given that the public is adequately educated on the candidates for elections as a result of the excess amount of communication today. The Electoral College should be abolished because small states are over represented, the system is unfair to third party candidates, and a tie leads to a vote in the House of Representatives.
To prevent disaster, and protect the American people, our Founding Fathers created the electoral college.
The old system of electing electors to the college is still in place – and it should be. The Electoral College should not be abolished because it properly divides power - but still keeps it in the people’s hands, keeps extremists out of
Nonetheless, the electoral college should be abolished because citizens’ votes should all count equally all states should get the same attention from presidential candidates, and everyone’s voice should be heard. The electoral college system ultimately fails the citizens of bigger states because their votes don’t count as much as those in smaller states. How? Well, as previously mentioned, there’s 538 electors who are distributes
The invention of the Electoral College is particular to The United States; there is only one like it in the world today. Many other countries use the popular vote, or use a parliamentary system to pick their leaders. This brings up the question of if the Founders, in creating a unique voting system, were mistaken. The passionate supporters of the Electoral College argue that this invention is fair and should be kept in use. In fact, they are wrong; the Electoral College should be abolished because of its undemocratic system, its discrimination against voters in different states, and the subversion of its original purpose as was intended by the Framers.
If we somehow happened to be a capable vote, then we ought to have the capacity to really pick who might be president. The Electoral College removes that from us. The Electoral College is not by any stretch of the imagination reasonable for our rights and our opportunity. It, for the most part, takes away the ability to vote the president. The Electoral College was made in a period when votes were harder to gather and number.
The Electoral College should be discontinued because it gets rid of the people’s power that they have in the nation, it makes makes it so that every vote is an important vote, and the whole Electoral College system is messed up since each state has their own rules.
The Federalist system of our government requires there be a sharing of power between branches, which is very much enforced with the Electoral College. There are speculations that with the abolishment of the Electoral College, the Federalist system would be lost with it. The Electoral college also helps to promote the two party system, and while some people may take issue with this, it is a way of creating stability in our government. With the distribution of power the Electoral College promotes, this allows the minority to be represented. However, there is a big issue in that the majority vote is not properly reflected by the Electoral College.
In 1787, years after the founding of the United States, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the new nation would govern itself. The delegates understood that the need for a leader was necessary but still bitterly remembered how Britain abused of its power. The delegates agreed that the President and Vice President should be chosen informally and not based on the direct popular vote, thus gave birth to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is defined as “a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president.” Since 1787 the Electoral College has been the system for voting in the United States, but with our nation ever more changing and growing it
The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral