Another reason the Electoral College should be abolished is that Americans have much more knowledge in the topic than they did in 1789. One of the reasons the Electoral College
Cracking is defined as an action of “dispersing the members of a particular group across two or more districts, state legislators can dilute that group’s voting power and prevent it from electing a representative in any district.” (We the People, 385). Clearly, the state legislators handle the power of collecting votes based on their favor. In this method, it decreasing ability of winning of a particular party based on splitting voters in small and multiple districts. For example, in the Congressional district in Columbus, the state’s capital of Ohio, in 2006, because Democrats were growing larger than Republicans, Republicans divided Democrats into three districts and added more republicans to decrease the influence of Democrat party.
State Rep. Randy Dunn D-Kansas City, has filed House Bill 497, which would adopt an agreement to elect the President of the United States by the nation popular vote instead of by the decision of the Electoral College. House Bill No. 497 comes in response to outdated and unjust Electoral College system. “Every Missourians’ vote should count the same,” said Dunn. “Whoever the majority votes for that given person should be the victor.
The democrats have stayed with this system more so than the republicans because Nixon and Reagan buried their democrat rivals in the general elections and won by landslides so, they decided that when they have a candidate that they know will not stand up well against the rival party, that they have the ability to impact who gets nominated and possibly field a more successful candidate. If I would have been asked this question prior to this election, I probably would have said “Get rid of the superdelgates,” but now I’m not 100% sure. With a candidate like Trump, you see that he has a great voter following, more than anyone thought would ever take him seriously. Imagine if the Democratic Party had a candidate like Trump (some see Bernie Sanders as a “grassroots activist” in the Democratic Party although Bernie is not emotionally and negatively divisive). Trump may take the popular vote but, he may not get the “unpledged" delegates (Republican Party) or enough total delegates to get the nomination and for me, that would be a “pro” for the “super or “unpledged” delegate
My third amendment I want to consider changing the 12th amendment the election of the president and vice president. This amendment was created to tie the electoral college in the president and vice president election. My reasoning is that whoever can vote should be able to choose who they want as president not the electoral college. This should be abolished because this country is a democracy and the popular vote should count not the electoral votes (Debate.com). With Hillary Clinton, more than 300,000 votes ahead of President Donald Trump in the popular vote count as of the election calls have already begun to ditch the Electoral College system enshrined in the Constitution for choosing presidents (Editorial Board).
But this was no regular election, they were voting off of who was more known than voting off of the good things that both of them can do for the United States. But the election was not based
As an encouragement to vote most of us have probably been told, “every vote counts” at some point in our lives. In reality, this is not true in presidential elections due to the Electoral College and what it does. The Electoral College has flaws in it that can prohibit the outcome of the election from accurately reflecting whom a majority the people of the country cast their vote for. Not only will he abolishment of the electoral college change the outcome of elections, it can change the whole campaign process and the way some people in less represented states feel about voting increasing voter turnout.
Over the years we have used electoral college to determine our presidents. Currently our system is for who ever gets the majority vote in each state gets all of that state’s electoral votes. Because of this system, there have four been presidents who actually lost the popular vote but still won the presidency. Obviously this system is flawed. There have been plans discussed to replace it.
Should the Electoral College Be Abolished? What were they thinking? In order to balance the needs of states and give voting power to those deemed trustworthy, the founding fathers developed the Electoral College system. Thus, each state was entrusted with a specific amount of electoral votes to cast in the presidential election.
t 's said we all have one vote no matter how rich, poor, tall, short, smart, or uninformed, we get one vote and elections are the great equalizer as everybody is reduced to "one vote." (Wrong) When it comes to the US presidential elections, some voters have more influence than others. When we vote, we aren’t voting for the President. We are voting to encourage our state’s Electoral College members to vote a certain way. And if the past and current elections hold, it looks like one candidate will win the electoral vote while another wins the popular vote as we saw in the 2017 election.
Should the President be Elected by Popular Vote? It is the year 1824, the two main candidates for president are John Quincy Adams against Andrew Jackson. Jackson has raked in 153,544 popular votes and 99 electoral votes. Adams has received 108,740 popular votes and 84 electoral votes.