Has creativity literally been executed by schools? Why arrange math and science over other subjects? Since the start of middle school, students have been given a set number of "core subjects" they obtain gain credit for. Four out of the seven periods at school the kids endure sitting in a classroom, and listening to a teacher talk in relation to a subject that they may not practice later in life. In addition to core subjects, students must obtain credit for a foreign language, physical education, communication class, and human services course. After being told to enroll in these subjects, students only have one or two spaces left for whatever music classes and other fine arts classes they want to take. Numerous amounts of studies have proven that in order to produce well-rounded individuals one needs to have some experience in the arts. So why have schools not offered a variety of fine arts classes? Therefore, shouldn 't …show more content…
Ken Robinson gave a TED talk regarding creativity not being as nourished in schools as it should be. He talks in respect to the uncertainty of the future; and instead of telling the succeeding generation that they need to stick with a career path that will remain steady and beneficial, we need to support the paths they 've chosen. In addition to the parents pushing the kids to become successful in the arts, the schools they attend also need to have a game plan to help put these children on an accelerated and successful career path. He explains how in all education systems math and science stand at the top of the "hierarchy" with the arts at the bottom. The system comes about based on two ideas, subjects that prove useful for work and academic ability. A process of academic inflation that has been occurring has caused a progressive amount of college graduates to move back home and have a surprisingly little amount of motivation to achieve employment. Intelligence continues to be thought of as diverse, distinct, and
In her article, Davidson explores our current educational system and its problem, she states “The problem, however, is the confusion of “high standards” with “standardization.” Our national educational policy depends on standardized tests, but it is not at all clear that preparing students to achieve high test scores is equivalent to setting a high standard for what and how kids should know and learn” (59). Despite excelling on these tests can be considered as overachieving or an elite quality, it does not however, test those skills that students may have acquired or are going to need to put into practice. Those standardized tests are also very limited and are not inclusive of other talents that a student might have. Just like the girl with the green hair in the middle school that Davidson visited, her artistic talents are never challenged or even considered by those educational standards.
In the article, “Blue Collar Brilliance”, published in the summer of 2009 by Mike Rose in the American Scholar, Rose persuades people that the amount of someone’s educational level doesn’t justify their intelligence level and we shouldn’t base our opinions of their intelligence purely off their jobs. Since this article was published in the American Scholar his target audience is people of higher education and those who might hold stereotypes of blue collar workers. Rose is highly successful in persuading his audience to form new opinions on blue collar workers and their overall intelligence levels. He emphasizes his credibility throughout the article with anecdotes, a well thought out organization of his paper, as well as an elevated vocabulary
“Intelligence is closely associated with formal education- the type of schooling a person has, how much and how long- and most people seem to move comfortably from that notion to a belief that work requiring less schooling requires less intelligence” (Rose). What Rose is trying to infer is that just because you are labeled blue collar: meaning you have to earn your income from manual labor, and have lack of educational knowledge, does not mean you cannot earn the knowledge in your work career. There are many opportunities to learn from your job even if you are less experienced. “...One who is so intelligent about so many things in life seems unable to apply that intelligence to academic work.
Their statement supports the author and his case by supplying extra facts about college graduates not having a job right after so they resort to a lower paying job where college may not be required. Continuously, Rose talks about the basics such as reading, writing, and simple math as a being “cognitively rich” (1041). Using a logical approach, he set an example for why blue collar workers are just as intelligent as white-collar workers by saying
TED is one of the non-profit organizations that does help to share different ideas of different people to the world through their persuasive talk. Sir Ken Robinson, in his Ted Talk, discusses how systems of public education disregard the creativity as it is an important factor related with the growth of students, academically. Robinson does focus on the creativity by arguing through different examples, which does make audience, and other viewers to think on this issue and take action which is being ignored by public education system. The use of pathos, ethos, and logos while his talk regarding creativity in school makes the case of education system entertaining and understand, by giving proper examples with the use of humorous tone.
Michael Metzdorf Dr.Tomko WRT-101-039 3/4/16 Comparing and Contrasting Two Articles Both articles, “Are Too Many People Going to College?” and “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” differ in many ways from each of the author’s own experiences. The first article “Are Too Many People Going to College” argues a bachelor’s degree is a necessity and your ticket into the working world. If a person doesn’t get a 4-year-college degree society will judge him or her as being not as smart or less than someone who possesses a bachelor’s degree. However, “Blue-Collar Brilliance” argues that while it’s still important to get a bachelor’s degree, there are still some good high paying jobs that don’t require any college education at all.
Lynda Barry in her work The Sanctuary of School, wrote about her life as a kid with a toxic family life where she relied on school to be a place she feels secure. She tried to escape from her toxic family by going to school; was the only way for her to relieve her mind. The school granted her freedom to draw and provided her a safe place to stay. Painting and drawing was the only activity that made her happy. By doing these activities were the only way to express herself.
High school students should be required to take at least one arts course each year. Taking an arts course helps students find another subject of interest and try new things. For example, before high school, there is a chance that a student has never taken an arts course before, so now the student has a chance to find another subject of interest in the arts, or simply try it out. As a result, students end up learning more about themselves, and students may even think about taking up one of the arts as a career or hobby. It all goes to show that students should be required to take at least one arts course each year, as students are able to find another subject of interest.
Student’s name Professor’s Name Course Date Successful use of Rhetorical Strategies Introduction Ken Robinson delivers a TED talk on “schools kill creativity” filmed in February 2006. The talk aims to challenge the education system and the fact that it has little emphasis on the creativity of individuals. Robinson notes that children should not only be made to pursue their studies but also follow their passions and their interests which lie in their talents.
Artwork is all around the world, but is it really worth the resources and time for it? In the essay “Is Art a Waste of Time?” by Ryhs Southan he discusses the purpose of art and explains the group, Effective Altruism. The main argument is that Effective Altruism do not agree with using resources and time on artwork. Effective Altruism is against artwork the resources, and time it uses up that do not contribute to the poor.
Why Have Arts in Schools? President Barack Obama once said, “The future belongs to young people with an education and the imagination to create.” In schools, one of the most overlooked and underfunded subjects are the arts. During the 1930s, art education was greatly supported in the U.S. However, as time progressed the focus of education shifted to more standardized tests, science, and math.
Introduction Visual and performing arts tend to act as separate entities within the field of education; considerably isolated from the majority of academia, these sectors are often considered to be secondary or elective options after completing primary education. The arts are an essential part of a well-rounded education, however, when an institute begins a budgeting process, the arts are rarely considered a top priority. For example, during periods of recession many public schools within the United Stated were forced to cut visual, performing and musical arts programs, despite studies that proved the exposure to the arts to be beneficial for students both academically and in extracurricular activities. Learning in an art-infused environment
Why the Arts Should Stay In Schools In a perfect world, there would not be a debate over whether or not the Arts should be in schools. The Arts would still be in schools nationwide and their budgets would not keep getting cut. Sadly, we do not live in that perfect world and we are faced with the sad truth; many kids are not getting an education in the arts and are not living up to their full potential because so many arts programs have been cut nationwide. Kids are forced to focus on core classes and to constantly test.
Fine arts should be prioritized in K-12 education because these programs help cultivate students minds into responsible members of society and teach them valuable skills for college, the workforce, and beyond. According to What the Arts Can Do for You, “Studies [indicate] that knowledge of the arts can improve students academic performance. By learning about music and arts they say that students develop thinking, communication, and problem solving skills.” The fine arts challenge students to use higher order thinking methods and to stretch their minds by forcing them to think outside the boxes and bubble sheets of traditional curriculum. By teaching students creativity skills, students are better prepared for their careers where they will have
Modern day schooling forces students to fit a mold only a select few can fill by creating too much structure and having an overbearing emphasis on math and science, when other, less structured extracurricular activities can promote respect, discipline, and teamwork. Most would agree that, in early stages of life, art is a detrimental and necessary part of any child’s early development and education. In fact, Pre-K through third grade’s education curriculum is usually centered around promoting early creativity and a fondness for learning. Kids learn math by counting colorful pieces of bricks. They learn both science and the basic principles of functionality by playing with train sets and toy cars.