Others may say, “By allowing kids to leave for lunch, they have more opportunities to eat healthier food” (“Top” 6). Consequently, whether what students should be allowed to leave the school for lunch really depends on their grades, and personality. Because making the irresponsible students stay at school while the mature students can get rewarded for their hard work, is the reasonable idea. In the end, schools should not allow students to have off- campus lunch because it gives them the choice to do something against the rules and puts them in danger. All in all, students should not be able to leave campus for lunch.
Sure many people such as Michelle Obama have tried to reform the school lunch menu, but the schools don’t seem to follow the regulations posted. The quality and nutrition of lunch at Lawton Community Schools, and many other schools, needs to be improved. With recent changes been made to the nutritional standards in school lunches, it seems that schools are increasing nutrition, but decreasing quality. “A recent USA Today investigation found that the nation’s largest fast-food chains have higher quality and safety standards for the meat … than what the U.S. Department of Agriculture has for the meat used for the National School Lunch Program...” (Buffenbarger). The food we serve our kids across the country has regulations, but all in the wrong places.
Intro Name:Jayson lostaunau in the article pro/con:Are our school lunches healthy enough by McClatchy-tribute news service the genera is real problems.The article is about the first lady's choice in making school lunches healthier.the thesis is we could have healthy lunch but we could have something else that is not so healthy but can keep us eating lunch,because if the lunch is nasty then we won't eat and get sick from not eating.If we have something that we like then we won't get sick. TAG Brief Summary b Thesis(Reason 1, reason 2, reason 3) Body Paragraph 1 Name:Esmeralda Prieto In the article,it says that lunches are not healthy enough and that they need more healthy food in them.This shows that they want to put really healthy food but,really little of it.They need to put healthy and a little of unhealthy food to be full.Also sometimes when they cook the food it’s not always good or not fully cooked.In conclusion,they shouldn’t do the healthy food because nobody is going to want to eat it. Transition and topic sentence(stating reason 1) CD CM CM Concluding sentence Body Paragraph 2 Name: Tiffany Ramirez In the article “PRO/CON: Are our school lunches
There’s a reason the cafeteria doesn’t provide soda because it is not healthy for you. Therefore, many schools try and serve nutritious and healthy foods. Also in the vending machines, they might sell junk food, but they don 't sell sodas because I figure that the teachers told them not to. But if they store them with healthy food, then students won’t buy as much. Most teachers want students to start a healthy life and be obesity free and I think all students care about their weight.
Even with these positives, the school still gives kids free chips with their sandwiches. Overall, there are definitely some aspects of school lunches which should not have to be changed, but general reform of school lunches for the health of the students is absolutely
“Healthy school lunch means students are getting the nourishment they need to power their minds and bodies to learn.”-Unknown. This quote is relevant because students need good, healthy food to be able to focus in class. When the students have eaten a good healthy food they won’t be worrying about when they’re going to get their next meal. The food needs to actually look edible for kids to even think about eating it. Children go home sick because of the low quality lunches.
There will be many diseases and sicknesses going around from kid to kid. And there will never be any healthy choices being passed down from generation to generation. This is a problem that has a whole debate, but fast food should not be sold in schools is the side that is stronger. Instead of selling fast food, people should sell healthy food at schools and everywhere else. If people were to do that, the three problems explained in this article, would
As you know, numerous schools sell junk food at lunch. Students may enjoy a sweet treat during the school day, but others are thinking differently, that the junk food should be kicked out and replaced with healthier foods. Even though a healthier lunch program would be expensive and take some time to get used to, schools should use it. Providing students unhealthy foods can lead to obesity, it can cause early unhealthy habits; and students should have enough time to eat these healthy foods at lunch. The surplus of junk food available to students in public schools has the potential to lead to a high rate of obesity in youth which can have very many negative effects on students physical health.
A third of the child population below the age of 20 are considered obese. The way Americans eat today and the lack of physical activity is leading to serious health risk that will continue to get worse as children age. Parents need help from the government to help make changes in the environment that children grow up in. such as, limiting the unhealthy advertisements targeted at children, creating safe places for children to place and exercise, and encouraging parents to prepare nutritious meals for their children as opposed to fast food (Childhood Obesity). Interagency Working Group has started making a difference by setting recommendations for foods advertised to children.
This solution is the responsibility of parents and partly the school. School lunches should be nutritional and the meals at home should also be nutritional and balanced. I would say the FDA is trying to create some balance with the snacks. They are making sure that the foods we eat are actually what is promoted. This problem is affecting everyone not just children.
They also think this is a low cost way to feed their kids. However, many kids skip lunch because they are disgusted with the food given to them and to pay for the free or reduced lunches much of the money comes out of teachers paychecks. Michelle Obama will not take any request or take feedback to better the proposal. Firstly, michelle obama 's involvement in the new requirements is horrendous.Michelle has turned the deaf ear to parents. Nobody knows their child like their parents, and every child is different ,you can 't make a “one size
There are reasons like, it doesn 't hold you for the rest of the day, etc. Say I eat school lunch, probably like the period after, I 'd get hungry yet again because not only do they limit the lunch food, but it 's not enough for most of our appetites.” Most kids do not eat school lunch because of that fact that it is tasteless and not beneficial. Students should be able to leave school during lunch to get away from smelly
The HHFKA also focused on the kinds of foods accessible in schools. The HHFKA imposed stricter restrictions on the types of food products accepted in schools and advocated for more physical and nutritional education programs (Edwalds, 2013). The HHFKA permitted the USDA to control competitive foods and required more severe nutritional standards for the meals distributed in schools (Edwalds, 2013). Additionally, the HHFKA required the USDA’s nutritional guidelines to be proven by scientific research and be in accordance with the Dietary Guidelines for the U.S. population (Edwalds, 2013). Limited funding has continuously to be a severe problem for the NSLP (Echon, 2014).