Money In Schools Essay

Throughout the United States, it is clear that there is a difference in academic success rates between high and low-income families. Schools located in high poverty districts are lacking the support and educational resources they need to succeed, such as textbooks, Promethean boards, and tutors. While the schools located in wealthier areas have many resources and higher success rates. Several programs have been put in place by the government to help decrease the gap between the two classes. However, throughout the years, recent studies have shown that the rift between them has been steadily increasing. Since many students and families are suffering due to this division, government officials should invest and distribute more money into schools

Many people believe that funding has no correlation to the quality of education and that “some countries that spend far less than the United States on education consistently outshine this country on international tests” (The Hechinger Report). The reason why many schools in other countries do better while spending less money is because they spend and distribute their money differently than the United States. Many policymakers “declare victory after instinctively throwing money at the traditional public school system, with little evaluation as to whether children are actually learning” (Lueken). The government should distribute its money more reasonably and actually focus on whether or not the school is improving and where they need to better in the education system. Many people also argue that “the poor are poor because they have failed to work hard and get the education which is open to them” (Thurow). This is false because the poor never got the proper education they needed, are a part of the inadequately funded school system, and may have many family disruptions. The poor would not have to be going through these educational struggles if the money spent on education was more accurately