Balancing family and work is one of the challenges in the country. Expectations for working parents involve working full time to sustain a family, but do not have enough time to play as a parent. Research and studies have revealed parents work to associate direct outcomes in children’s development. However political discussions rarely mention relevant effects in children. Demands for paid maternity leave policies are hoped to be granted to help benefit the life of families.
Jeannette have a very tough childhood where she have to go up quickly,so that she can work to make money. This way she won’t starve and feel the chill of winter, where there’s no heat in the house. She can also break ties with the move and rent new house to find new money sources because her dad can’t hold a job for a long
Collins starts off by explaining how homes are affected when there is a change in the economy. Collins provides examples on individuals having less time to spend at home with their families because they have to put in more hours at work. The reason for why they need to
Kids should get paid for good grades. Kids in today's society all want money and we'll do anything to get it, including get good grades. Many studies have shown that people work harder if they physically get something out of there work such as money or candy. Since the kids today don’t get anything for good grades it's making them not want to try hard or put in any work into their school grades. Just think, going to work every day and not getting paid, would people still try their best and put all their time and effort into their job?
I just don't think families who are in the lower classes should be held fully reposinble for how many words their children know. Articles like these don't take into account the fact that children from poor families don't have the luxury of having their parents be around all the time. America is at a place where both parents have to work and bring in a household income so that their family can survive. Poorer parents have less time and fewer resources to give ot their children, which can leave children to be less prepared for school, which then leads them to be less prepared for their future, leading to lower incomes. Recogonizing that there is a growing cycle going on here is the only way to go about alleviating the problem.
Justice for Youth said that the slave trade prey on families who are in dire need of income. This proves that homes are possible to achieve for the reason that families who have somewhere that can bring them back on their feet, they have a less likely chance of putting children into the slave trade. Another problem is these families are looking for something to help them back on their feet,so having this home to live in would help. If these families have a place that will help them obtain a source of income, then they will not be obligated to sell their children or themselves. Thousands of kids are dying daily around the world because of hunger, this is actually one of the root causes of child trafficking.
Jurgis and his family went to purchase a house but found out they will be paying monthly, which resembles more of a rent based system than a purchase. On top of moving into a new house they have learned that the payments also have an interest fee on top of their monthly amount. One of their neighbors decides to share a story with them about other families that have not been able to pay off the house and have been evicted which highlights the corrupt nature of the landlords. It also points out that the families before them have had to rely on a key wage earner for the monthly payments and when they are overcome by disease or injury from the stockyards they lose the house. Unfortunately, Jurgis’s family is effected by the diseases from the stockyards as well but they do not have time to take off work in order to
How will parents provide for their children if the child care assistance is not available to them? Parents no longer have the option of family members babysitting their children while they go to work. The child care assistance program was made for this particular situation and to help those who babysit children to compensate for the person’s time. For instance, parents who works from 9am to 5pm will pay an estimate of four hundred dollars a week, but with the child care assistance program they will save money. Therefore, parents will have to make alternative arrangements in order to keep their jobs, but if they do not have someone to help them, they are forced to quit their jobs and collect unemployment if they are eligible.
Parents may be hesitant to leave their child in a low-quality, risky environment or with grown-ups who don't give an animating or warm environment for their child. This may be a specific issue for lower-income families, who have more restricted options of suppliers. Interestingly, a great care environment may support livelihood and more hours of work bringing about higher efficiency. Parents will probably be on time to work and less inclined to miss time from work in the event that they know their children are in great hands. Among low-income ladies, higher-quality child care may build livelihood, steadiness of job, and hours of work (Campbell et al.,
Stop feeling guilty and focus on a different mindset. Think about how what you are doing is helping the family in many ways. By working, you are bringing in extra money to the family that you can spend on tuition costs, groceries or even a fantastic family vacation. When you are at home with the family, stop thinking about the pile of work on your desk and instead focus on your kids. Ask for Help No one can do it all.
When the kids get older they may not be able to get the robots, so they might not know how to do basic things when they own a home. The house they live in now gives them everything they want and as you see in the quotes above, the son is very disrespectful towards his parent. This relates to us because in our situation the parents are doing everything for their children much like the house does. Another quote is, “Instead of letting them go outside to play, parents filled their kid’s spare time with organized activities, did their homework for them, resolved their conflicts at school with both friends and teachers, and handed out trophies for just showing up” ( “Are We Raising a Generation of Helpless Kids?” ). This shows how much parents do for their children.
If you think about it parents do things around the house everyday. The only way it would be fair for kids to get paid is by the parents getting paid also. That is my opinion why kids should not get paid to do everyday jobs. They should be doing those tasks anyways its a part of life. So the question is should kids get payed for chores?
Washington’s view on their employees’ priorities inaccurately assumes that giving up their career for their family means their career becomes less important to them. Although, in the eyes of the employee their career is still equally as important to them but they have grasped the harsh reality that their values of their family had slowly slipped through their fingers during the process. In the article, Slaughter makes a point that employers make it hard for a parent to balance their private lives away from the office along with the hours spent while at work. Therefore, the assumption made is people in power place low values on the care of their children compared to their other obligations. I would categorize this under a false causalities assuming that a persons’ morals on the care of their children is decreased once they have reached a position of power.