Spanking remains a common, if controversial, childrearing practice in the United States (Gershoff, 2013). I believe that parents should be trusted with the freedom and responsibility of shaping their children’s behavior. Spanking can be one effective discipline option among the many options in a parents’ disciplinary process (Gershoff, 2013). I believe spanking, as a disciplinary action, is useful and should be administered within the proper guidelines. Anderson and Anderson (2009), conducted a twenty-one item questionnaire using fifty‐nine practicing psychologists from Northwestern Pennsylvania about attitudes and practices related to the spanking of children. It was found that the majority of the respondents spanks their own children, felt that children need to be spanked, sometimes, and have no regrets about spanking their own …show more content…
I would want my children to understand that the small sting of a spanking is connected to a greater and often long-term pain of harmful choices. When I have a child, they will always receive a warning about their negative behavior before a spanking is given and will understand why they will receive this disciplinary action. If my child deliberately disobeys me, I will inform him or her of their upcoming spanking and take him or her to a private area. Afterward, I will have repeated the lesson that I would want my child to learn; so they understand and learn from this teaching experience. In today’s society, many parents try a friend to their children and withdraw from the idea of administering discipline (Pingleton, 2014). Conclusively, disciplining our sons and daughters is part of the tough work of parenting, but it will pay off in the long run. Parenting is a hard job, but I believe you can’t go wrong if you exercise a firm and consistent hand; with a soft and loving
Writers tend to use various methods when attempting to persuade their reader. Although numerous approaches exist when discussing persuasion, in the article “No Spanking, No Time-Out, No Problem” writer Olga Khazan persuades her reader by explaining the issues and offering better improving techniques, using rhetoric devices such as pathos, and by using tone of voice. Khazan explains the controversial topic of punishing one’s child by attempting to persuade parents to change their disciplining style (Khazan). Khazan proposes his purpose that though punishment might make a parent feel more at peace with themselves, it will not correct the child’s bad behavior (Khazan).
Lastly, Kazdin uses his point of view of it all to give the maximum input on discipline and how it doesn’t effect the outcome of behavior. Doing so gives more points towards his idea and helps parents and readers understand how viable his point is and how he wants it to be in effect and parents to actually use his idea. Explaining and giving examples of kids in certain situations also helps the reader understand certain ways that he wants this new parenting tool to play out. This article helps inform the reader on the “better” options to parenting and an attempt to help kids and their bad behavior lower significantly or that is the goal at
In the essay “No Spanking, No Time-out, No Problems” the author uses several elements of non-fiction including Rhetoric, Issues at the core of Humanity, and Arrangement of topics and paragraphs to convey the points trying to be made by the author. To elaborate on these elements this essay will analyze who the author uses these elements and why they help convey the author’s points. The author addresses the controversial issues of disciplining one’s children by proposing alternative methods of dealing with the misbehaving children that everyone has or knows someone who has a misbehaving child. Positioning with others that believe that rewarding good is the way to go, the author on the issue of how a parent should raise and discipline one’s
My feelings regarding spankings are inappropriate because it models aggressive behavior in young children. 8. Spankings should be administered with care. 9. Corporal punishment is the use of physical force causing pain, but not wounds, as a means of discipline; such as spanking, shaking, slapping hands and etc.
In the article “No Spanking, No Time-out, No Problems”, Olga Khazan uses many rhetorical strategies to support and persuade her audience. That traditional punishment methods of parents will not change a child’s/children’s unruly behavior overall, but positive reinforcement will increase the chances of better behavior not only now, but in the future as well. “Positive reinforcement is the presentation of a pleasurable consequence following a behavior” (Craighead). This twist to traditional discipline teaches children to work towards a resolution instead of teaching them to lean toward violence. “For example, the way that parents discipline their children is how children discipline their peers” (Khazan).
The opinion piece ‘Gently Does It’ written by Cheryl Critchley, asserts the dire effect ‘smacking’ young children has on their development and potentially aggressive future. ‘Smacking’ often elicits a vehement debate, with parents saying it is their right and decision whether “to smack or not smack”, with others suggesting it proposes an unclear and burred line regarding domestic abuse. Critchley’s article was posted on the 10th of August 2013 in the Sunday Herald. This choice of platform is concurrent with an older target audience, particularly parents who or may not be partaking in the ‘harmful’ act of ‘chastisement.’ A maternal tone is adopted by Critchley throughout the entirety of her piece, whilst showing growing concern for the probable
The issue Khazan discusses in “No Spanking, No Time-Out, No Problems”, parents need to change their own behavior, before wanting to change their child’s behavior. Khazan confronts the issue of punishment along with behavior using a persuasive writing style to share her thoughts on punishment: “Punishment might make you feel better, but it won’t change the kid’s behavior” (Khazan 25). Khazan presents a child psychologist, Alan Kazdin’s to speak on parenting interventions. Along with parenting intervention, Khazan utilizes her interview with Kazdin, presenting a more of an understanding towards the issue of punishment. Utilizing Kazdin’s parenting interventions, he uses examples to prove that; punishment should not be used to fix negative behavior.
Spanking is the most common type of punishment in a home, but some also wonder if it’s the right thing to do. Punishing kids through spanking has negative effects on a child’s overall health and is not the right thing to do. Over the years, many researches have been conducted into finding out the repercussions of spanking on children. One of the many outcomes is that children have a poor relationship with their parents in the future.
Spanking is good for the mind because it teaches children. The author also states that a study shows that people who are spanked perform better at school and is most likely to want to college than their peers who had never been physically disciplined. Also stated in the article, research lack much info because it was difficult to find subjects who had never been spanked. In the study that was conducted it shows that results that others do not show because it involved 2600 individuals that never been spanked. It was difficult in more traditional time to find subjects.
Students that are spanked tend to do worse academically and become victims of bullying. One in six adults says that when they were kids that they had at least one very hard spanking in school (Abuse Affects
This study was conducted on April 25, 2016 by experts at The University of Texas at Austin and the University of Michigan. Elizabeth Gershoff and co-author Andrew Grogan-Kaylor. Their study focuses on what most Americans would see as spanking and not a potentially abusive behavior. During their study they found that spanking your children can cause them to defy their parents more frequently and can also cause a lifelong mental health issue. It showed as the frequency of spanking increases, the likelihood of anti-social behavior, mental health issues, and aggression also increases.
One woman stated that she spanks her child to prevent him or her from having problems in the future with higher authority, such as
Spanking is a form of discipline that parents use towards their children when they are doing something that is deviant. However there are both pros and cons when it comes to spanking a child. A study done by Murray Strauss was conducted to see if spanking increased antisocial behavior in children. A total of 807 mothers, with children ages 6 to 9, were chosen in the study (Strauss, Sugarman, & Giles-Sims, 1997). The results showed that 45% of mothers that spank their children do it around 2.1 times a week (Strauss, Sugarman, & Giles-Sims, 1997).
Many people think that the reason for this is easily described as “if you hold the reins too tight, the horse will buck.” Over punishing a child can be a bad thing, it will make the child want to retaliate more so than if one were to cut a little slack. However, under punishing a child can be bad as well, not teaching a child right from wrong can majorly increase the odds of the child doing the wrong thing. Reasons that parents give for spanking their children are to make children listen better, and to encourage better behavior, especially to put a stop to children's aggressive behaviors. Research shows, however, that spanking, or indeed any form of physical punishment, tends to have the opposite effect.
Studies have shown that spanking increases aggression 2. Spanking has been linked to lower IQ 3. Physical punishment is associated with increased mental illness C. Thesis Statement: Even though most parents use