While most police officers do their responsibilities with integrity and uphold law and order in our communities there have been instances of alleged police misconduct. Several people have demanded that police officers wear body cameras while on duty to address these problems. body cameras may increase responsibility and openness, which is helpful for the police and the communities they serve. Body cameras can help police-community relations by filming interactions between officers and observers while also being used for evidence in situations of suspected crimes. overlooking the advantages of body cameras for police officers and the community that they serve is very important in this context.
Police officers not wearing body cameras the country
…show more content…
(“The use of body cameras provided the necessary evidence to exonerate police officers falsely accused of misconduct”). There are so many police officers that get accused of doing something bad and the body camera can be useful and will be used for evidence to see if the police officer did something wrong. (“The number of severe misconduct allegations deemed false increased 2.4% with body camera footage, and the number of officers exonerated for less severe allegations related to conduct, courtesy, procedure, and service increased 6.5%”).In addition, this camera footage can be helpful for police officers that get accused of doing something bad when they get a call to go somewhere this can even be helpful for domestic violence. In addition, this camera footage can be helpful for police officers that get accused of doing something bad when they get a call to go somewhere this can even be helpful for domestic …show more content…
(“Equipping police departments with body cameras is extremely expensive as forces have to budget not only for the camera but also for ancillary equipment (such as a car charger or mount), training, data storage facilities, extra staff to manage the video data and maintenance costs”).in so many places are hard to fund money and it's hard for them to afford the cameras. Even though police officers should not wear body cameras this argument is weak because so many people from the country really want the police offer to wear body cameras so the officer can be safe and the citizen to be safe and if they do this can be really used for evidence and court that can help people that did not commit a crime. As shown above, that all police officers should wear body cameras is good because it's useful for the officer and the citizen and it's worth good evidence to teach people what's good to do and bad to
Police worn body cameras are a very big part of policing now, they are increasingly being shown on the media to show that police are attempting to improve the relationships between the public and police. Police body cameras have been and will continue to be a controversial topic in policing because of the issues with privacy laws and how everyone stopped by police will be recorded. In this paper, it will discuss more in depth about the positives and negatives of police worn body cameras and a conclusion from the evidence collected. The use of body cameras in policing has been around since the early 2000’s, but as of late police body cameras have become increasingly implemented over the last couple years, but these
In Fort Worth, an officer Sikes gave an anecdote that boils down to him having experiences where people would begin aggrandize their reactions and they would begin to calm down once they knew they were being recorded. Secondly, many police officers actually want body cameras to protect themselves against false accusations or brutality, discrimination, and many other things. In Denton County, there was a specific incident where a witness video just showed the perspective where the cop unjustly tases an African American at a NAACP protest. However, that police officers body cameras saved him in the lawsuit because it revealed that the had actually warned the person by saying “get back” multiple times before any actions were
For the police officers to wear the body cameras it values the safety of the cop and the individual. Whenever they come into contact verbally and if it gets physical then it
The cameras show what really happened at the scene. Police not wearing body cameras is a norm that should be changed. Police should wear body cameras while on the job. The cameras lowered the percentage of police who used lethal force when it was unnecessary, and the cameras keep policeman from being wrongly accused of using lethal force. Although it reveals private information, the information can help the police locate them, along with helping us get a image of what they look like.
So many lives could be saved and so many police officers’ careers could be saved through the utilization of this idea and the reaping of its benefits. Whether it captures a citizen attack on a police officer or whether it captures a case of police brutality, the great possibilities outweigh the potential cons of police body cameras and make them a risk worth taking. Whether one takes the side of the citizens and believe the police are typically irrational or one takes the side of the police and believe they are only doing their jobs to the best of their ability, the incorporation of body cameras to the controversial police force would be extremely beneficial for
Without the videos proving a victim to be innocent, these police would be walking among us as killers, disguised as our protectors. When officers and citizens are aware that their behavior is being monitored, both parties have an immediate tendency to behave accordingly. “The results of this study suggest that this increase in self awareness leads to more positive outcomes in police-citizen interaction,” (Wile, 2015). The government is losing money by not subjecting police to wear body cameras. Police misconduct expenditure costs $1.8 billion annually, while the cost to supply police with body cameras across the nation only ranges up to $20
With all the advancements in technology, there has been a public demand for law enforcement to wear body cameras. Some police administrators, civil rights groups, politicians, and victims family have requested law enforcement mandate policy and force officers to wear body cameras in an attempt to increase accountability and transparency (Bradner, 2015; Fieldstadt, 2014; King and Disis, 2015; Morgan, 2015). There are positive and negative aspects to law enforcement wearing body cameras. In December 2014, President Obama created a task force to study twenty-first century policing, and proposed investing $75 million into purchasing 50,000 body cameras for law enforcement in the United States (Office of the White House Press Secretary, 2015). Body cameras are an essential part of our modern day policing.
Did you know “... the main reasons (about 80% each) that local police and sheriffs' offices had acquired body-worn cameras were to improve officer safety, increase evidence quality, reduce civilian complaints, and reduce agency liability” (“Research on Body Worn Cameras and Law Enforcement”)? Police body cameras have multiple usages and ways they can be useful to society. Police body cameras should be enforced to protect both officers and citizens. To begin, police Body Cameras can improve the chance of having better evidence to prove accusations. The author states, “One 2016 study found that 92.6 percent of prosecutors’ offices nationally in jurisdictions where police wear body cameras have used that footage as evidence in cases against private
First, they shouldn’t wear body cameras because it raises high privacy concerns. For example, “Recordings raise high privacy concerns. In some states, anyone can access the video.” (Should Police Wear Body Cameras, pg.23) Also, “Study Reveals Police Officer Are More Likely To Be Assaulted.”
Although officers claim they aren’t as unprofessional as everyone says, many people beg to differ. A lot of people have evidence on how they were mistreated, and how the officers weren’t at all professional. Others have been killed and seriously injured, but the idea is still up in the air after several years. To protect themselves, and others around them, police officers should be forced to wear body cameras while they’re in a case or are talking to a suspect while on duty. Having to wear body cameras would be a positive way to help the authorities to see the truth better than just having to listen to the voice recorder.
Now there is two possible outcomes, there was police misconduct and abuse of power, or the police officer did everything correctly and by the book. Either way there needs to be something that can protect the public from police misconduct and also protect law enforcement from dealing with false accusations that can tarnish their reputation. That is why body worn cameras need to be mandatory for all police officers to wear because it protects the public and the police officers that are wearing them. A couple positive outcomes police officers wearing body cameras is how they can lower police officers misuse of authority and also lower false complaints against officers as well. These are two
From interactions on the street to testifying in open court, an officer’s word is everything. Once that credibility is gone it is almost impossible for that officer to continue in a law enforcement capacity. Body cameras have emerged as a potential solution to the evolving discussion around police trust and legitimacy issues. One benefit of having a body camera is that if a critical incident, officer involved shooting, or accusation of brutality arises, the camera will provide footage from the officer’s point of view that
Police body cameras are extremely helpful to the justice system and law enforcement because they provide visual and audio evidence for events that have happened. They are efficient and reliable because they are clipped to a police officer's shirt, and records everything that goes on during a dispute. Police body cameras improve police accountability, they provide evidence in criminal cases, and prove police testimony to the public and to Law Enforcement. They record interactions between the police officers and the public, and provide truthful information to the public and Law Enforcement agencies. One thing that police body cameras do is improve police accountability.
A major benefit for having body cams is the fact that it will decrease the force used by Police Officers. For the past couple of years there has been many videos of Police Officers using excessive force against innocent victims, especially with African Americans. “The notion has been around for a while. But since August 's fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri -- for which witness accounts varied widely -- it 's gained traction to become part of the national conversation about police conduct.” (Brandon Griggs 1)
Speech Outline Title: Body Cameras I. Introduction Attention-getter: Body cameras were used because of Michael Brown’s death and police misconduct. B. Significance Body cameras may increase police accountability and protect them from accusations. C. Credibility: My interest in this topic is due to the latest deadly encounters with police officers and improving the communities’ safety.