Should Pop Vending Machines Be Allowed In Middle Schools Essay

Corporate sponsorships should be used by schools to provide a better learning experience for children and adults alike. With the extra funds from the sponsors, many things can be given and funded for the students that would be impossible to do without this money. Things like many clubs, arts programs, more teachers, or even a larger school. These things can have an extremely large impact on a student's education, and can make them actually want to go to school and learn.

I agree that only nutritious drinks should be allowed at school. Firstly, a large percentage of kids are obese by age twelve. This can be fixed if only nutritious drinks are sold at schools. Secondly, some students may also need the drinks because they may not have access to them at their house. Lastly, students need to stay healthy and active. If schools do not offer the nutritious drinks, some students could suffer from malnutrition and other devastating diseases. Heart disease is a major disease in America, it is responsible for millions of deaths each year. The sugar in pop, and carbohydrates in other popular drinks are the two main causes of heart disease.

Did you know that Americans spent $76 billion dollars on soda or energy drinks in 2013? Teens today consume too much sugar from sugary drinks. The youth today are more unhealthy than previous generations and need to reduce their sugar. The article,”Soda Showdown”, written by Rebecca Zissou, presents two perspectives about taxing sugary drinks.

Many people believe that only nutritious drinks should be offered at school. They claim that by doing this, students will be healthier, and do better in school. However, I disagree with this policy, and would like to convince you why my opinion is correct. Even if you stop selling a particular product at school, students will always find some way to get it from somewhere else. I believe that you shouldn’t only offer nutritious drinks at school because they’re high in sugar, students will bring drinks from home, and students will boycott the vending machines.

There are three main reasons to support my opinion why sodas should be banned . To begin with a soda is beverage that is bought by expensive cost. Such as a same volum of soda and water that you want to buy in a supermarket is 500 milliliter ,water is bought in 7 baht but Soda is 14 baht . In addition,more soda ingredients are toxic chemicals

The many contradictions in the soda ban lead to many workarounds, proving how much of a bad idea the law is. According to “Soda’s a Problem But…”, an opinion

The highly debatable and argued over ‘soda ban’ has been taking over the world and grabbed the media’s attention. But why? Well, many think the ban is about soda, but really, it isn’t all about soda. Truthfully, it is about the world thinking about the decisions they make. But, the ban does restrict all drinks ran by city that are above 16oz or have 50% or more of milk and fruit juice. However the soda ban may have some positive effects, ultimately the ban is a bad idea. Due to the contradiction it brings, the fact there is only one person making the decisions, and the other ways people can spend money.

Most kids today drink sugary drinks when they get home or when go out to eat. Grocery stores sell soda and sugary drinks throughout the business (Leaf Group Ltd). Someone could be getting their groceries, and they would be able to get them with all of the other food or where they check out. “Researchers tracking 6,900 fifth-graders from public schools in 40 states through the eighth grade found that 85% of eighth graders reported drinking a sugared beverage at least once a week (about 30% said they drank them every day), regardless of whether their schools banned them or not.”(Alice Park). Most kids drink pop daily so it should not stop them from drinking it at school. “Students have many ways of accessing sugared drinks outside of the school lunch program, including vending machines, school stores and cafeteria a la carte offerings that students pay for themselves rather than with lunch vouchers.” (Alice Park).

That is true, however this argument is weak because there are in fact bigger problems than soda being a health issue. Itś your choice on whether you drink soda or not. It won't do much damage unless it becomes a very consistent thing. Though soda is bad, we have much bigger problems killing people. For example, cigarettes or smoking in general. It affects people who are not even committing the action, but people who are near it. The soda ban should not official because of those bigger problems. Stated in ¨Soda´s a Problem But…¨ on page 288, ¨There are times when the government has to step in on obviously dangerous situations- especially those, such as smoking, that affect the people other than the person whose behavior would be curbed-...¨ (Klein, 289) Furthermore, Cigarettes affect more than one person. The Soda Ban is something we shouldn't be worried about if we have another problem possibly killing someone faster and quickly. Despite the mentions of it reducing health issues, the ban still does not deserve to be put in place since there are other severe problems that should be discussed

Dr.Pepper is a better soda brand than Coca Cola, because it has less caffeine and better flavors than Coke. Some people agree that Dr.Pepper has more sugar and doesn’t taste nothing like Coke. While others disagree that Coca Cola is a better Beverage. Because if you drank Dr.Pepper you can easily taste a bit of cherry in your mouth having your mouth smell like cherries. According to Debate.org an Investigator RacH3ll3 had mention that Dr.Pepper is a better drink stated,” Dr. Pepper taste better also it has less acid than coca cola. Why would you want to drink something that has more acid. (Dr.Pepper is better than Coke). Also they both has almost the same Ingredients. Dr.Pepper has Carbonated water, high Fructose corn syrup, Caramel color,

Does business growth and success always acquaint to community growth and success? Bartow J. Elmore explores this question in his book, Citizen Coke: The Making of Coka-Cola Capitalism. Elmore looks at the price that the environment and the public has paid to allow Coke to rise into the power it is in today. With operations in “over two hundred countries and selling more than 1.8 billion beverage servings per day”(7), you simply cannot deny the influence and power that Coke has. Coke is a widely successful business, but their growth has come at a cost. The public health, environment, and economies around the world have all paid the price for Coke with little given in return.

“... Obesity is an issue that needs to be addressed. It is one that needs to be addressed with education, compassion, and support, not government mandates” (Stone, para 2). Prior to the middle of 2013, New York city mayor Michael Bloomberg had implemented a law that banned soda containers over the size of 16 ounces to be sold, but the ban was later repealed by the New York State Court. Essentially, the main controversy was whether the ban should have been repealed or ever created. According to Stone, by limiting people from doing something as simple as drinking certain amounts of soda, the city was going through the wrong course towards their objective. Although it may seem as though a ban on large amounts of soda would help solve many crises

Coca Cola became such a well known American Icon because it was a suitable drink for everyday consumption by people of all ages unlike alcoholic drinks and wasn’t bitter like coffee and tea. Also, Coca Cola was always there during hard times in American like the Depression and the Prohibition period. It became well establish by people that journalist William Allen White declared “it was a sublimed essence of all America stands for…”

The answer is simple--sugar. Sugar is just as deadly as a cigarette or a can of tobacco. Sugar is causing the obesity rates to skyrocket in America. Sugar has invaded every product that’s not naturally grown, it’s in yogurt, drinks, bread, and many other foods and drinks consumed on a daily basis. We need to start somewhere on banning sugar. That is why many propose regulating the purchases of carbonated drinks pact with sugar, or more commonly known as soda. One can of soda contains about 2.5 tablespoons of sugar, and on average, 9% of the daily calories consumed per person is from soda. Due to the high numbers of obesity in America, soda’s and other drinks high in sugar, should be regulated.

The topic which is critical issues on the implications of teens and children’s consumptions of sodas and other sugary beverages. Beverages are different types of drinks made for human consumption to quench thirst. Sugary drinks or soft drink