The plaintiffs were deemed to have the right to question the reasonableness because they are considered people by the constitution because they are of age,and thus are provided the prerogative to demand the rights guaranteed to all people by the constitution. Those affected by these guidelines are the sole reason the rationality is being questioned. If it were another facet of society being discriminated against other than allegedly disruptive students, the absurdity of these rules would be evident. The rights of students regarding their right to choose their hairstyle freely had been upheld in previous cases. The only times the courts sided with the those imposing the rule were those in which they were able to show a sound correlation between hair length and health, behavior, and, or
They gained control pretty easily but now they will need to maintain that power. To do this, the government will ban things like books and psychological conversations which exercises the brain but without these intellectual discussions, people will just fall deeper in the already made hole by the government which will make everything worse. Those who offended these rules
Ideally, there can be no difference from one person to the next in this community. In order to accomplish such a task, everybody is given a mandatory haircut, all hair has to look the same in order to prevent one being more superior to another. Along with haircuts, the clothing worn by the people in the
While the school administration argues that the dress code brings school unity, they are wrong because it takes away a sense of individuality from each student (Logos, concede). In today’s society, people use fashion and their daily outfits as a key way to express themselves. Students are constantly told throughout their school careers that they should demonstrates what makes them “different”, yet uniforms deny that sense of self-expression. According to Grace Chen of the Public School Review, uniforms may result in students turning to “other avenues of self-expression that may be viewed as even more inappropriate than clothing” (Ethos, professional credibility). This includes a nontraditional hairstyle, make up, or acting out towards authority at school or at home.
In political science, states have a legal monopoly on violence within their sovereignty; in reality, this means a Government’s domestic policing powers are largely unconstrained, as it can justly, or unjustly, coerce, imprison, and murder in the name of the public. Yet in modern America, and most of the western world, constitutional checks and balances have constrained state interference; these limits specifically curtail a state’s policing power by protecting the individual’s autonomy from political tyranny and partiality. These so-called ‘natural rights’, liberties, or protections originated from the Enlightenment, and established the importance of individuals in relation to their societies and states. Modernity thinkers such as Tocqueville
Humans have a natural desire to do as they please and get upset when others try to come in and control what they’re allowed to do. It’s been proven all throughout history that people dislike being overly controlled by their governments and the main reaction from a strict government is typically rebellion. However, these people also want the government to protect them from harm. In his “Second Treatise of Civil Government”, John Locke states that “... the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very
John Locke once said, "The end of law is, not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom."1 Throughout history, the fight for human rights has been an on going battle that has been reviewed and adjusted as time progresses. Before the Enlightenment, people believed the government was not protecting humans and their rights. In Europe during the 17th and 18th century, Enlightenment thinkers stepped out of boundaries and challenged the established order. The American Revolution and French Revolution were inspired by ideals of John Locke and other Enlightenment thinkers.
For example, The Party takes control of marriage. Marriage is supposed to be a life decision that is between two significant others instead of having a higher power arrange a marriage. The Party chooses who you will marry “All marriages between Party members had to be approved by the committee” ( Orwell 37 ). The Party arranging marriages is not even the worst part either, if there is any attraction to the other they refuse to let them be married, “ Permission was always refused if the couple concerned gave the impression of being physically attracted to one another” ( Orwell 37 ). How would you have freedom if you can’t even choose your life partner that you spend the rest of your life with?
The human experience is made by being able to dress freely without someone taking away those given rights. Dressing to the way we feel gives us the chance to express ourselves like how schools want us to when we grow up, but it has to start somewhere. Students should be able to have the experiences everyone else does, if not completely, then starting with something small such as
True freedom is commonly defined as absolute choice; whether it is in thought, actions or speech, freedom is an individual’s ability to take control of their lives and enables the human experience. Civilization views freedom as an ideal, yet the means of achieving it and whether or not freedom is truly achieved remains ambiguous. There are often individuals in civilized society who struggle and believe themselves to be free after a hard earned victory against oppression. Yet, the implications of maintaining a civilized social structure upon freedom is often overlooked. Many individuals view themselves as free from a subjective standpoint, although true freedom has an absolute meaning.
If you do not want to follow the rules you are given by your parents then you should be limited. You need to follow the rules given to you by the person, because they are trusting you and endorsing that you follow them. If you get the freedom you need to respect it. If you make a mistake you should have it be taken away, and you have to earn it back. When you are out in your community you need to respect your rights.
But he is punished for his actions, and is sent to the principal 's office. However, “Good Hair”, is the most blatantly obvious loss of culture, as it is a literal, physical loss. The
We want kids to express themselves but it seems like they aren't allowed because it's going to be a distraction. Everyone can express themselves except black female students because their hair will disrupt the other student's
Over the last 20 years, many schools have shifted away from fairly unregulated student dress codes to more stringent dress codes, with some schools implementing voluntary or mandatory school uniforms. There are several positions on the dress code issue, each of which have their own persuasive arguments to support them, which can be evaluated to examine their validity. One position in favor of implementing dress codes is that these standards can improve student safety and perhaps even student performance at school. There are variations on this position that favor strict standards on what students can wear, while others want to implement school uniforms in public schools. The opposing view is that students should not be subject to any dress codes on the grounds that they restrict students' freedom of expression, and that they may place unfair cost burdens on poor families.
Many high schools have implemented dress codes that set rules for what students can and cannot wear while on school premises, and yet many people disagree with these policies. Though arguments can be made for either side, a dress code can have a very positive outcome for all parties involved. A fixed dress code promotes professionalism in a learning environment, and contrary to popular belief, it does not limit a student’s freedom of expression. Last but not least it encourages equality and acceptance among their peers. A dress code can be reasonable if used in proper situations that require certain attires.