Should Service Animals Be Allowed In Public Places

Not only that, but canines save many human lives everyday trying to make a safer place in the community. Many people say that too many dogs are being used instead of humans and that they should be looked at as officers not equipment. Back to the other argument, people say they may be shot in the line of duty, yes they may that's the price they could possibly pay for serving. But officers pay the same price that they do, these dogs are not being used as equipment all these dogs have rightful owners that take care of them and provide them with a lovely home and treat them as another officer of the law. Even dogs that go to great risks in combat can even be awarded the medal of honor for their bravery.

All living species should be treated with care and respect, no organisms should be made a commodity for the sake of human interest. Exotic animals, which are unusual or rare species such as lions, tigers, and non-human primates – are nowadays kept within households as pets. However, according to research, 98% of the people believe that exotic animals should not be kept as “pets”. Such opinions are due to several reasons that are sometimes supported and other times opposed. Exotic animals should not be treated as pets because they are not completely tamable, they belong to their natural habitat, and they may be transmitting zoonotic diseases to those around them.

A dog park should have strict rules to keep everyone safe. Also to respect the ones who do not want the dog park.All dogs should have a muzzle on at all times.This will prevent dogs bites.Also it would prevent the dogs from barking so it would not disturb the community. A community vote should take place before building a dog park.It is very expensive to build a dog park.So to be fair since the tax payers have to pay for that reason there should be a vote.There should also be a vote on the rules so everything becomes legal and respects the community. Those are my reason why i think a dog park in the city is a good idea.property value would go up.Rules could be added to insure everyones safety.Also to keep everything fair and equal a community vote should take place to keep everything

They disturb people’s normal life and bring fear to the society. While adopting a dog, people did not think about the consequences they would bring to their neighborhood, they only think about their future happy life. Meanwhile, because people can not predict the long term impact of keeping a dog, they can not encourage this behavior. People should take fully consideration before taking action and think about the long-term consequences, and do not define the behavior to be right or not. For instance, Dalai mentions that “In medicine, for instance, the drug thalidomide was found to be excellent for the treatment of morning sickness in pregnant women, but its long-term

It’s a big responsibility to take care of an exotic animal and it’s a risk to your life. A cage is not a home for an exotic animal, they should be free in the wilderness doing what they do best. An exotic animal such as a tiger is very dangerous! In source one the author Mia Lewis states “Out on their own, these exotic animals can be a further danger to the public, and even to the environment”. In other words it won’t matter at all if they are trained, as soon as you release them they will act on their natural behaviors.

The pit bull is a breed of dog with a reputation that has been skewed by misrepresentation of evidence and flat out lies. The pit bull has no inherent dangerous characteristics and banning it would make no progress in safety. It is common knowledge that all animals are controlled by their instincts. Dogs may bite or growl at a person to warn them, but if a person doesn’t listen to that warning, it is the person’s fault. Banning pit bulls will not change an animal’s natural instinct and make people safer.

Consequently, these programs lead to a surplus of animals. Zoo enclosures can only hold so many animals so this surplus of them makes the living conditions even worse. On the contrary, it is cool to see animals that you would not normally get the chance to see, but despite this, animals need to be well taken care of in a good environment. Animals should not be taken out of their home to become an attraction for people. They should be taken out of their home only to be helped and then

I think that only service dogs should he allowed in public places. Service dogs are better because they don’t carry disease and if other service animals can make a mess. The new law make people safe. They will have consequence and be injuries because of the other service animals. The new law will make people be safe.

We can put all these rules into affect and try to stop it in every way that we can, but who's to say it will actually stop? Getting rid of a certain fighting breed, giving dog breeders and animal shelters ways to look for signs of people that fight dogs, and start making it mandatory for dogs to be microchipped are all great ways to prevent the fighting of dogs. The dog fights may not ever go away, but there is a a chance that it could decrease significantly if we put these rules into affect. Dogs don't deserve to be treated like play toys to just hurt and abuse for no reason, dogs are supposed to be loved and cared for. Having a dog is a privilege not a right.

If there is more back there and next time you go to a animal shelter or a pet shop and you see that pitbull give it a chance at a better life because you wouldn't want you kid to live that life would you. So why let them live like that it's not fair so all i ask is give them a chance you never know you might find your next best friend. I mean i understand that everyone has a bad experience with dogs but not all of them are bad. Some of them yes but you can't think all dogs are bad because of one dog you met in your life. So when you see a homeless dog give it a chance and be nice to it.