There is a debate between different sources on whether or not students should be getting paid for good grades. The issue is that people are being influenced by others who all agree with the claim that students should be getting paid for good grades. Although there are many claims as to why students should not be paid for good grades. One being that students should simply want to learn for themselves and their own growth. Another reason is that children would be working for money, not education when it should be the other way around to later on in life get good money and a good job.
This means an effective class and raised teaching standard which in-turn improves the overall motivation of the teacher. This results in a positive influence on the productivity of the teacher as well as have positive influence on the overall satisfaction of the teacher. To understand the importance of planning from an intrinsic viewpoint, it is important to consider the real advantages, which could be driving an increased teacher enthusiasm. A fully planned lesson allows the teacher to maintain focus throughout the lesson. As discussed previously, effective lesson planning can have a positive effect on the motivation on a teacher.
Accordingly, paying students for good grades lower self-esteem when they don’t succeed in what they desire to succeed in. When considering the choice of paying children for good grades to not paying kids, the choice should definitely be to not pay kids for good grades. Nevertheless, kids have lower academic performances, and rewards are given when the student actually deserves it. The students that want to obtain rewards is different from students who know they will earn the honors. Students shouldn’t obtain money for good grades, as in the long run, it will influence
Student success is founded upon the encouragement teachers and parents give to students to have a growth mindset rather than have a fixed mindset and not accepting challenges. According to “Raising Smart Kids” by Dweck, “The helpless ones believe that intelligence is a fixed trait: you only have a certain amount, and that’s that. I call this a ‘fixed mindset’. Mistakes crack their self-confidence because they attribute errors to a lack of ability, which they feel powerless to change. They avoid challenges because challenges make mistakes more likely and looking less smart so.” (23).
Some people even found that sometimes a non-paid student does better that a paid-student. This may be because that if you remove a reward to a paid-student then they will feel bad and do bad. But do this with a non-paid student and they won’t care and still do good. Now the thing that i’m trying to say is that kids are better off wanting to learn
Also, there are no beneficial outcomes, paying students for acceptable grades have in the long run. Actually, the students do worse. Paying students for good grades is not a good idea because success should be its own reward, there are no long-term effects, and students end up doing worse in the long run. First of all, paying students for good grades is not a good idea because success should be its own reward. Many parenting experts claim,” kids should be satisfied with the warm fuzzy feelings of accomplishment.
They believe that the reward is more important than the time spent learning. Many people I have come across that are in an honor roll joke about how they would not be a part of it if it were not for them cheating on their tests and other assignments. They think that having “National Honor Society” on their college application is better than learning on their own. What is going to help them in the long run, being in an honor roll or the information they were supposed to absorb and learn? Kohn does not believe that students should cheat but understands why they do.
Many parents have always used rewards such as money as a way to incentivize their children to do well in school, but recently some schools have been making programs that pay students standard. Some people think that using cash as motivation for schooling is wrong and would only create more problems; however studies have shown that this is not the case for a vast majority of the situations tested. Students should earn money for exceptional grades because it would improve overall student work ethic/morale, decrease the amount of missing/late assignments, and increase the number of students who do well on standardized tests. Students should be paid for their hard work because it would make the majority of them both happier and more eager to do their assignments. In a recent study conducted by the MDRC, a
It seems that the class was too smart for their own good, but remember “I” and “me” weren’t allowed in this dystopian society. So, instead of saying “I” and “me” they said, “we” and “us” because it “is evil to be superior to them” (21). Equality 7-2521 was just trying to fit in, but “It was not that the learning was too hard for us. It was that learning was too easy.” So, his sin is ultimately his willingness and dedication for
“Succeed so that you can help us in future”. This is always the narrative when a member of the society gets into higher learning. The general population wants to get the best out of someone but what happens when circumstances do not allow for success. Cheating in the exam is one way to make people happy in that one has to violate the rules that govern exam misconduct. In this case, cheating is good but is it morally correct?