In the generation in which we live, it is sad to say that shootings happen way too often on public grounds, such as schools, malls, or movie theaters. Because of the growing number of massacres in the US, the issue here is whether or not teachers carrying firearms could possibly prevent school shootings. The problem occurs when studies are done and the facts are given about how one’s brain tends to react during such incidents. The argument in this article is trying to decide whether or not teachers should go into training in order to carry firearms on school property, in the case a shooting should occur. Another thought playing into the scene would be exactly how much training a teacher should have in order to carry on school campus. One side says that if a teacher were to have a gun, she could possibly kill the shooter, or injure them, thus ending the massacre. But the other side enlightens us on how our brains actually tend to respond in said situation. In a …show more content…
While adrenaline is rushing through your body, shots being fired are actually not likely to hit the target. If teachers were to carry firearms, it could possibly save lives, even if one has already became a victim of such a violent crime. According to the statistics, it’s civilians who generally put an end to shootings. I believe it would be a wonderful idea for teachers to be able to carry on a school campus, if they chose to. It shouldn’t have to be set in stone and make all teachers go to training to carry. I do wonder that if one teacher could have had a gun and saw the shooter in a hallway of Sandy-Hook Elementary, how many children would still be alive today? I know according to the facts, most shots miss the target, but what about if one didn’t miss? I believe it’s worth training teachers, physically and psychologically, on how to appropriately handle a school shooting, while carrying a fire
Teachers can protect students, other staff members, and themselves rather than being unable to do anything 4. Teacher armament is less expensive than hiring trained professionals 5. Teacher armament will decrease incidents of school shootings, and set a declining trend for any violent crimes happening on school
Arming Teachers Is Not The Solution To Stop School Shootings It’s only been about 12 weeks in 2018 and there have been 17 school shootings where students and teachers were killed or injured. This basically means that there’s a shooting every week. Of shootings perpetrated by minors at primary and secondary schools and for which the source of the firearm was known, more than half of the kids obtained the gun at home likely because an adult did not store it locked and unloaded. In all, these incidents resulted in 59 deaths and 124 non-fatal gunshot injuries. Because of all these school shootings, there have been people saying that teachers should protect their students, but in teachers’ contract, they didn’t sign up to do that.
We need to make a change and figure out why this is a problem in our amazing country. A solution for this problem of school shootings could possibly be arming teacher with gun. Teachers would have to have certain qualifications to be allowed to carry. Students would have a sense of security if teachers would be allowed to carry guns in schools. Safety in schools is a huge thing we need to focus on, not only are they innocent kids, but they are the future of the world and they will change and shape the world for years to come.
Students today live their day-to-day lives in constant fear of what seems inevitable. The United States has one of the highests rates of school shootings in the world. Society has become so desensitized to these shootings that they are no longer shocked to hear about another school falling victim to it. Even when students take a stand against gun violence, the only solution offered to them is a proposition to arm teachers. However, bringing more guns into a school will only further deteriorate the situation.
According to The Augusta Chronicle, if there was an “active shooter” in a school, he or she isn’t going to take hostages, they’re out to kill. Anyone near enough to him to be hit by a bullet in crossfire is already in mortal danger and will be trying to get away before the “bad guy” shoots them, so the teacher that is trying to stop the “bad guy” shouldn’t worry about a student getting in the crossfire (Should Teachers Be Armed). If you are a parent of a student in a school shooting, wouldn’t you feel better if of all of the bullets flying towards your child, some were flying towards the “bad
Teachers could feel more comfortable in their classrooms if they knew they could protect themselves and their students from violent threats. Schools being a gun free zone are a target for violent
Addi Saxton Argumentative Paper Mr. Andreson Many highschool students have faced the distressing reality in today's world on school shootings. As a student in highschool this subject is very close to my heart because I know someone who was in a school shooting but also it leaves me feeling vulnerable and demanding for action. This essay will be about the reasons for school shootings, outcomes, and to prevent such tragedies. After understanding all of this we can figure out how we can work towards making schools safer for us and for the future generations. What is a school shooting?
This should not be a worry for the child or parents but it has to be because at this point any school is a threat. So a possible factor in decreasing shootings is arming teachers, by doing this teachers can fight back instead of shielding or running from the shooter. Reason #2 teachers can defend their students by changing this law and using correct training teachers should be able to carry a weapon. By doing this not only insure safety it will give relief for parents all over the country. This tactic will give school staffs a chance to outnumber a possible shooter.
Over the past few weeks, arming teachers has been a controversial topic throughout the country. School shootings have taken the lives of many over the past few years, yet they are becoming more and more frequent. In today’s society children shouldn’t have to go to school worried if they are going to be safe that day. If teachers are armed it will add that extra bit of protection to the children. A big question is if arming teachers is even going to matter if an active shooter happens to be in that school.
In 2011, 10.3 in every 100,000 people in the U.S. were victims of gun related deaths. If the teacher would have had a gun then he/she could have shot the attacker. Teachers should carry handguns because it provides safety for the students and because it is the teacher’s right. Teachers shouldn’t carry handguns because students would fear them. Ken Corbett a clinical assistant professor reported to Arming teachers: three reasons why teachers should not carry handguns in school that, “ When violent force is upheld as safety, fear and silence creep in.
This article has great viewpoints, use of argumentative reasoning, and shows what truly happens in the hallways of a school shooting. The main person he explains is Eric Harris, who killed over two-thousand students and faculty in a Colorado high school in 1998. He set off bombs all over the school and used a semi-automatic
Linda Schulman, the mother of Scott Beigel, a geography teacher that was killed during the last major school shooting, told lawmakers her son had become a teacher to teach, not “to be a law enforcement officer.” “If teachers were allowed to carry weapons in school, it could easily cause more chaos and fatalities,” she added. And she's not the only one who agrees on this. Most school shootings happen from inside the school such as threw staff or people who have a connection with the staff. For this reason, if teachers were allowed to have concealed weapons, it would cause havoc in schools and might increase problems instead of decreasing
Would it be effective to arm teachers in a school and is it possible it would reduce the chance of a school shooting such as Columbine? Arming a teacher may increase the response time for an emergency in a rural school district and would be able to provide safety. Although it can provide safety, it may be still possible that allowing teachers to hold a weapon in school grounds will also cause many risks and be very dangerous to the students or faculty in a school. In an arming teachers program, the teacher will go through 35 hours of training and will be able to maintain five classroom hours a day to gain the knowledge of holding a weapon and be certified. A teacher will be selected and unknown to others in a school district to maintain safety to their identity and safety to the students in the classroom.
Hypothetically, a law is passed stating that teachers are allowed to carry guns in school. In a sick twisted world, the teacher becomes the school shooter. Your student is in class and their teacher pulls out their government funded school weapon and starts shooting. How is your child supposed to protect themselves if the approved district teacher starts shooting the students with a malicious intent. Teachers should not be allowed to carry guns at school.
With reaction being defined by Merriam Webster as “to behave or change in a particular way when something happens, is said, etc.” If the police cannot be there to react to an attack that leaves only the school staff, including teachers. The main controversies involving arming teachers are that: 1.) Children will find the guns and think that they are toys and will thus play with them.