Should There Be Allowed To Obtain Evidence
Any evidence that is obtained resulting from the use of illegally obtained evidence is not allowed to be used in court. Also, evidence that is seized, but was obtained through the violation of a person’s constitutional rights is not allowed to be used in court. These methods of obtaining evidence are made illegal by the exclusionary rule. There are many other regulations that stem from the exclusionary rule, such as the fruit of the poisoned tree rule, the inevitable discovery exception, and the good faith exception. All of these rules pertain to the guidelines of what evidence can and cannot be used in court depending on how it was seized or searched.
The fruit of the poisoned tree says that any evidence that can be used to incriminate a
…show more content…
The inevitable discovery exception says that illegally obtained evidence may be admissible in court if officers would have “inevitably discovered” the evidence, had they when about obtaining it in a lawful manner. Although this is a guideline that stems off of the exclusionary rule, it is not always promised to members of a trial that the exception will be allowed. It can take years to reverse an evidence exclusion ruling. In some cases, evidence may first be excluded as it is a violation of the exclusionary rule, but years later, the evidence may be admissible because it is an exception – as it would have been found in a legal way by law enforcement somehow or another. Another direct exception the exclusionary rule is the good-faith exception. When a court allows a good-faith exception, they allow evidence that was technically obtained illegally, via an invalid search warrant, to be used in court if an officer seized said evidence in “good-faith”. If an officer acquired evidence in “good-faith,” this means that he or she was not aware of the invalid-ness of the search warrant. In contrast, if an officer is aware of the invalid search warrant, but still proceeds to attain evidence, the good-faith exception will not be applied and the evidence will not be allowed in
Civil Court Case: Horton V. California
247 Words | 1 PagesIssue: Is the warrantless seizure of evidence in plain view considered prohibited
Summary: The Case Of Sam Wardlow
899 Words | 4 PagesBut, that was not the case and the officers did pursue sam without probable cause. Evidence that was founded by taking an individual’s rights is illegal and cannot be used in
Billy Greenwood And Dyanne Van Houten Summary
602 Words | 3 PagesIn 1988, California v. Billy Greenwood and Dyanne Van Houten was about a suspecting of selling and using drugs in Mr. Greenwood house a narcotic officer told the man to bring her the trash bag which Greenwood had placed out the street for pick up, but as the officer search the bags she found drug paraphernalia which was used as evidence to convict Mr. Greenwood but the lower court revoked it because she search the trash bag without a warrant and that was a violation of the fourth amendment. but the trash bags was placed on the street were any child or animal can unseal it so he could not argue about his privacy if it was out in the police for anything or any person to expose the content of the bags but the court stated “ the police cannot reasonably be expected to avert their eyes from evidence of criminal activity that could have been observed by any member of the public “ this means
Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Youngstown Sheet And Tube Company
2406 Words | 10 PagesSupreme Court also ruled that any state officials that obtain evidence by the process of illegal seizure or searches may not admit the evidence into criminal trials. The Fourth Amendment protects the rights of citizens from unreasonable seizures and searches (Pearson Education). This decision by the U.S. Supreme Court enforces the exclusionary rule of search and seizures to the all levels of the government and limits the powers that police officers have over citizens by protecting their Fourth Amendment rights (Oyez Project). This case and the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court has redefined the rights of citizens accused of crimes. The decision is controversial because it makes it difficult to determine when or how the exclusionary rule is applied.
People V. Riley Case Brief
463 Words | 2 PagesThree related precedents govern the extent to which officers may search property found on or near an arrestee. Chimel v. California, 395 U. S. 752, requires that a search incident to arrest be limited to the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, where it is justified by the interests in officer safety and in preventing evidence
Riley Vs California Case Study
649 Words | 3 PagesThe California Court of Appeal later affirmed the convictions and denied the suppression of evidence on the basis of California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. Diaz. 3. Issue: The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable search and seizure. Riley involves whether police officers can search a suspect’s cell phone without a warrant during an arrest. In Riley v. California, the lower court ruled that a police officer not only can seize and secure a suspect’s cell phone during an arrest, but they can also search the contents of that phone without a warrant or probable cause.
Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Brady V. Bobti
596 Words | 3 PagesIntroduction: The United States Supreme Court cases of Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v. United States, and United States v. Agurs all deal with the prosecution's obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. These cases establish that prosecutors have a constitutional duty to disclose all evidence favorable to the accused. Failure to disclose this information violates due process and can result in a new trial or acquittal.
Exclusionary Rule In The Weeks V. United States Case
475 Words | 2 PagesAnd, federal law enforcement officials can even use the illegally obtained evidence against the defendant if local and state law enforcement officers did the search and seizure activity or if “federal law enforcement officials violated the
No Probable Cause To Arrest Hayes Essay
551 Words | 3 PagesThis is a criminal case, in which the Supreme Court ruled that there was no probable cause to arrest Hayes. Hayes did not give consent to be taken to the police station and be detained plus fingerprint. Therefore, Hayed Fourth Amendment rights were violated and the conviction was overturned. Fact of the case: In the 1980’s there was a series of rape and burglary that happened in Punta Gorda Florida.
Tlo Vs New Jersey Case Summary
424 Words | 2 PagesCase: New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) Facts: A high school freshman (T.L.O) had her purse searched by the Assistant Vice Principal at her school because a teacher found her and another student smoking in the lavatory. The Assistant Vice Principal uncovered cigarettes and marijuana. Procedural history: T.L.O. motioned to suppress the evidence because her Fourth Amendment rights were violated and was denied by the Juvenile Court stating the search was reasonable. The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court agreed there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the decision stating the search was unreasonable.
Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment
427 Words | 2 PagesBack in 1975, there was a major case called, Payton V. New York. Theodore Payton was suspected of murdering a gas station manager, they found evidence within his home that connected him with the crime. What caused the problem was the fact New York had a law that allowed unwarranted searches if the person was a suspect. Based off the oral argument presented by Oyez, the police said it didn't count as the evidence because it was in public view when entering the home. It had to be appealed before it was determined as unconstitutional.
Case Study: Spinelli V. United States
519 Words | 3 PagesThe following essay will outline the variances of two case” Illinois v. Gates and Spinelli v. United States. It will discuss the Supreme Court requires to establish probable cause for a warrant. Illinois v. Gates In Illinois v. Gates, law enforcement received a letter (that was anonymous) stating that the Gate family was in the drug transporting business, and operating between the states of Florida and Illinois. Upon investigation, law enforcement discovered that Gates had made the purchase of an Air Line ticket, traveling to Florida.
Examples Of Evidence In The Crucible
807 Words | 4 PagesEvidence that cannot be seen nor proven should not be legitimate in the court of law. In Herb Block’s Cartoon “I have here in my hand” Senator Joseph McCarthy is holding two pieces of evidence in his hands. In his right hand, he is holding a document
Mapp Vs Ohio Case Study
1872 Words | 8 Pages41. Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court ruling that decided that the fourth amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states. If there is no probable cause or search warrant issued legally, the evidence found unconstitutionally will be inadmissible in the courtroom and not even considered when pressing charges. The exclusionary rule, in this case, is a right that will restrict the states and not just the federal government, including the states in more of the federal rights as outlined in the Constitution.
Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule
493 Words | 2 PagesOhio (1961), the Supreme Court trusted that the Constitution charged the exclusionary rule as a remaking of a Fourth Amendment infringement. They saw the truths of the sample, the exclusionary rule which was the assurance of somebody 's protection furthermore required by the Due Process which portrayed the Fourteenth Amendment. The rule stated three purposes by the Mapp Court, the right given by the constitution and stated that when police admitted that they were at fault, judges then extended the violations in court. This would stop misconduct for negligence since the case of Mapp the Supreme Court has seized out many exceptions to the exclusionary rule. I would agree with exclusionary rule, searches are easy to get permission from most defendants.
More about Should There Be Allowed To Obtain Evidence
Civil Court Case: Horton V. California
247 Words | 1 PagesSummary: The Case Of Sam Wardlow
899 Words | 4 PagesBilly Greenwood And Dyanne Van Houten Summary
602 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Youngstown Sheet And Tube Company
2406 Words | 10 PagesPeople V. Riley Case Brief
463 Words | 2 PagesRiley Vs California Case Study
649 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Brady V. Bobti
596 Words | 3 PagesExclusionary Rule In The Weeks V. United States Case
475 Words | 2 PagesNo Probable Cause To Arrest Hayes Essay
551 Words | 3 PagesTlo Vs New Jersey Case Summary
424 Words | 2 PagesArgumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment
427 Words | 2 PagesCase Study: Spinelli V. United States
519 Words | 3 PagesExamples Of Evidence In The Crucible
807 Words | 4 PagesMapp Vs Ohio Case Study
1872 Words | 8 PagesArguments Against The Exclusionary Rule
493 Words | 2 Pages