Fannie Mae vs. Freddie Mac: Similarities and Differences
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are two companies established by the government to boost the housing market. These organizations are not only different in their genesis, but also in their target market and products. Taking an example, Fannie Mae buys mortgages from retail banks while Freddie Mac buys them from smaller thrift ones. (Fannie Mae vs. Freddie Mac)
The Roosevelt Administration established Fannie Mae in 1938 as a government agency. It bought Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgages and included them in its books. In 1968, it became a Government-Sponsored Enterprise (GSE). This meant that whereas the stockholders owned it, the U.S. government guaranteed its loans. That turned
…show more content…
By the fourth quarter of 2007, Freddie Mac reported a $2 billion loss. In response, the agency raised $6 billion in new capital through the sale of preferred stock to shore up its reserves. However, this was not enough.
Nevertheless, They Did not Cause the Mortgage Crisis
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did not cause the subprime mortgage crisis. Their portfolios held a lower percentage of subprime loans than that of commercial and investment banks. Nonetheless, they did increase their acquisition of these loans to keep their shareholders happy in what had become a very competitive marketplace. Before the financial crisis, they owned or guaranteed $1.4 trillion, or 40 percent, of all United Stated mortgages. Of that, only $168 billion was in subprime mortgages,
They are Now Owned by the Government: What It Means
The government spent at least $150 billion to keep Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage companies functioning. It has been managing the two GSEs since September 2008, when the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) put them into receivership. This was supposed to be temporary, but housing conditions have never improved enough to release the government of this
The FDIC was created in 1933 in response to the thousands of bank failures that occurred in the 1920s and early 1930s. The FDIC was a provision of the Glass-Steagall Act. During the nine year period from 1921-1929 more than 600 banks failed each year. The failed banks were small banks operating in the rural suburban areas and held the deposits of mostly farmers and blue collar folks. When banks fold and continue to do so, people will start to worry about their money in any bank.
If there was ever a word to describe the events that led up to the financial crisis of ’08, “Moral Hazard” would fit the bill perfectly. Moral hazard happens in financial terms when the success of a particular transaction is very heavily dependent on the performance of a particular party’s obligations, but where a particular party has no interest or incentive to carry out that obligation diligently. Let’s for instance take the example of a loan worth $720K, which was given to a strawberry picker earning around$14K/year to acquire a certain piece of property in the early 2000’s . In this case moral hazard was there and existed because the loan company intended to sell the loan forward to the credit rating agencies due to the inability of the
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was the federal government’s reaction to the financial crisis of 2008. The Dodd-Frank act symbolized the government’s regulatory stamp on the banks in the United States . This regulation from the Dodd-Frank Act set the goal to lower dependency on the bank federally by setting up regulations and tampering with companies that are deemed “Too Big to Fail”. Before the enactment of the Dodd Frank act, it took many obstacles to produce the content provided which sparked from the issue at hand with the financial downward spiral and the decisions as well as actions from overseers such as: the Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson and the presiding president George Bush. Two men emerged
The American sub-prime mortgage crisis and asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) crisis happened in Canada had huge negative impacts on the financial industry. With the bankruptcy of several major banks in North America, investors lost their faith in financial institutions and were not willing to invest their assets to those financial institutions because of extremely high risks. As a competitive player in the industry, Goodwin also faced this threat and had poor performance. Internal Analysis Strength: Goodwin was a well-diversified company with six divisions in different but related market segments.
Hi Miranda, I am sorry to hear about the property damage performed within your parent 's neighborhood. These actions affect the property values of homes when the house is sold for a much lower value that the market value. At that time during the recession, the market value of any home was dropped due to the fact banks were lending out loans to people without getting a solid read on if people could truly afford to buy the house. For those who lean out money makes commission, so it is not int their interest to ensure the person purchase a house can afford it.
However, the recession of 2007 was affected largely by the house bubble collapsing. The financial industries had designed complex ways for people to receive lends. There was a larger risk later that neither the investors of firms
The 2008 Great Recession and the 1930s Great Depression are both aftermaths of similar economic circumstances and are only different in a few ways. Despite the difference in severity of the stock market crash, both periods are unmistakingly marked by speculation on stock leading to Americans buying on margin resulting to the government needing to intervene. Speculation on stock led to the historic stock market crash in 1929 that brought on the Great Depression, similarly speculation on housing prices in 2003-2007 brought on the 2008 recession. With little regulations on stock market purchases leading up to the Great Depression, investors were able to buy stocks on margin, with the only requirement that they put 10% down. In other words,
On October 29 1929 America entered the worst depression in American history. With unemployment and poverty at a peak, droughts and dust storms raging across the plains, America faced some of its bleakest years, and many lost hope. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected into office in 1932; he entered the white house promising a “New deal” for America. With his New Deal, Roosevelt instituted bold in the federal government which successfully established Roosevelt’s three R’s: Relieve, Recover and Reform; relief for the needy, economic recovery, and financial reform.
The Federal housing administration distributed government insured loans in order to buy houses. This allowed people to willingly buy houses fearlessly. This meant that the housing market fail was relieved of its deflated prices. The FHA not only decreased homelessness, but it also helped contribute to the economy by returning the housing prices and made house sales more frequent providing more jobs in real estate. The Home Owner’s loan corporation also helped fight against the housing crisis.
Kyle Eakin From British taxes contributing to the Revolutionary War to the housing collapse in 2008, every major event in the United States can be tied to money in some way. Money has been a catalyst of change over our history with both positive and negative results with the Department of the Treasury naturally being a central factor. The currencies that predate the dollar helped to create the United States as they funded our fight for freedom in multiple wars. The US dollar, a currency created less than 250 years ago, has shaped the United States history and amazingly become the most polarizing and well-known currency in the world economy. Beginning in 1690 each colony had its own currency which led to many issues of exchange and the value of each currency.
Many families and businesses struggled to make ends meet. Many of the Fiscal and Monetary policies implemented received a lot of criticism due to the amount of money that had to be initially invested to help get the economy flowing again. From 2007 to 2009 the government implemented Economic Stimulus Act, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The three fiscal policies were designed to help get the housing market up and running again, as well as help provide tax incentives to families and businesses. Also, some of these did help bail out some major banks and even car dealers.
Prior to mid 2007, regional banks securitised around one-third of their housing loans while the major banks securitised less than 10 per cent. As a result, despite their smaller size, the regional banks accounted for roughly 40 per cent of Residential mortgage-backed securities issuance whereas the major banks accounted for 20 per cent (Debelle, 18 November 2009, pp.44). The financial crisis had a negative impact on securitisation leading it to the residential mortgage-backed securities to have credit problems, which made the credit market more cautious. Because of the crisis, there was enormous loss incurred by US and euro area banks from their holdings of mortgage-backed securities.
The purpose of this summary is to describe how the recession started, the events that led up to it, the size, and what happened in result. The recession started in July of 1981 and ended in November of 1982. In 1980, the United States economy was already in bad shape due to a 6 month long recession that the United States economy eventually made a modest recovery from. Although the short 1980 recession is not the focus of this report, it did play a part in the events that led up to the 1981-1982 recession.
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae played a major role in creating a secondary market for mortgages by providing liquidity to the market, thereby increasing demand for mortgages. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae had GSE statuses, which enabled them to take more risk relative to other financial organizations/institutions. That being said, they were able to purchase various mortgages from different financial institutions, package them into mortgage backed securities, and sell them to investors on Wall Street without an explicit guarantee on the mortgage values. On the other hand, Ginnie Mae, a fully government-owned institution, fully guaranteed repayments of mortgage backed securities.
Pressure Lehman Brothers was one of the largest investment banks in the world, so expectation and pressures of reporting positive financial results that apply to a bank of that magnitude are intense. Were a bank of this size to have a poor reporting period it would have a significant impact on its quoted share price. In the years leading up to 2008, Lehman Brothers invested heavily in the US sub-prime mortgage market. Were they lent large sums of money to individuals with the purpose of becoming homeowners, it was seen as a quick way of making money as they would group a lot of the mortgages together, sell them on to other banks and make a profit.