Similarities Between Bismarck And Wilhelm

1341 Words6 Pages
The foreign policies of Bismarck and Wilhelm had some similarities and differences among. Both Otto Von Bismarck and Kaiser Wilhelm II made a contribution to the significance of World War I. Firstly, they differed because Bismarck had developed a complex system of allies. Wilhelm was the opposite and left Germany isolated with no allies. Also, Wilhelm tried to become allies with Britain but it had failed, though Bismarck had an excellent relationship with the British (Kislenko). This shows the comparison of the two techniques each of them had used in order to gain success and the advantages one had over the other. Wilhelm also was more into war, and having a superior military. On the other hand, Bismarck was most definitely more focused on creating allies with different countries. Expanding on that idea, Bismarck cared about the safety of his soldiers but not as much as Wilhelm, who cared about their ability, safety, weaponry, and more (Kislenko). Wilhelm was a military fanatic, he even loved their uniforms. The views on military even differed quite a bit, details that one cared about, the other had a different opinion. Kaiser Wilhelm was much younger than Bismark, so his choices and rationality differed from those of Bismarck who was much older, wiser, and…show more content…
For one example, these two both were blamed and hated for an action of theirs. Wilhelm was at fault for the start of World War I. It was his policies that took the blame for “The Great War” to occur. Otto Von Bismarck was commonly known as “the best hated man in the country” by his people (Tucker). Being at fault for something, and being disliked was not a positive thing these two had in common. These two men share the common characteristic of intelligence. Both Wilhelm and Bismarck were very bright and quite scholarly (Kislenko). This made both of them into the determined and powerful men they
Open Document