British Colonization and American Identity Virginia, Massachusetts Bay, and Plymouth colonists all originated from New England, but what principle of individuality and community do they follow that each makes the Northern and Southern New World colonies diverge into these separate groups? Since the mid-fifteenth century, the European empire had their motives for traveling to America, along with their own set of ideas for an ideal civilization. The Virginians had aspirations for economic pursuit and a representative form of government, while their northern colonial counterparts focused more on the religious facets. Despite a few differences, these various attitudes towards what makes up triumph and the controversies over what is best to represent …show more content…
Unlike the Virginians, the Separatists of Plymouth were able to learn the significance of diplomacy with the Native Americans. Their success derived from cooperation with the natives, providing a basis for the Thanksgiving story. The Puritans of Massachusetts Bay held pride in their Christianity. In 1630, colonial leader of the Massachusetts Bay colony, John Winthrop had developed what he called “A Model of Christian Charity.” In this model, he refers to his colony as a “Company”, telling the colonists that they are obliged to be members of Christ and conduct themselves accordingly. In addition, part of the model …show more content…
Their dependence on Christ to help their community thrive forms a government much like a theocracy. For the northern colonists, religion played a critical role in dictating the aspects of the colonists’ lives. Virginia’s House of Burgesses and Plymouth’s Mayflower Compact are two forms of government that demonstrates a sense of community. … While each are fairly different from each other, both provides structure to their colony. The individual successes of John Smith, John Winthrop, and William Bradford are all strongly demonstrated by their leadership and influence towards the colonists. Robert Hughes, author of American Visions, provided details on a self-portrait of Thomas Smith. He wrote: The only Puritan self-portrait that has come to light was painted sometime between 1670 and 1690 by a Boston mariner, Captain Thomas Smith. The image says quite a lot about him: the fine bunch of French lace at his throat suggests that he was well-off, the naval skirmish near a coastal fort in the background must refer to some action in which he took part, and to signify moral plainness he is wearing his own hair in the Puritan way, not a wig. It also says, quite plainly, that he accepts his impending death. He is holding a skull, which rests on a poem he wrote himself and signed T.S.
In the early 1600’s British settlers colonized the east coast of North America forming a total of 13 colonies. These arising colonies began to grow and evolve into different societies despite being from the same region beforehand. One of the reasons that led to distinct separation among regions was social disjunctions. Others significant reasons include various economic incentives and political stance as well as religious motives. With varying social, economic, and religious disjunctions, the New England and Chesapeake regions both evolved into two distinct societies by the start of the 18’th century.
In March of 1629, The Company of Massachusetts Bay Colony was granted a charter from King Charles I to emigrate to New England. At the beginning of their new journey, English Puritan, John Winthrop, preached his sermon of "A Model of Christian Charity", as the new found governor of the colony. Winthrop's specific teachings in this sermon were God's new expected life of the Puritans. The Puritans were expected to live in this way as an appreciation to their God, if he had brought them to New England safely. Luckily, the Puritans landed in New England after all the hardships and troubled waters they encountered on the high seas.
The three articles that are being discussed in this review are three about the foundations and stigmas of Jamestown. The First one is Capt. John Smith, Pocahontas and a Clash of Cultures: A case for the Ethnohistorical Perspective, by Author Michael J. Puglisi. Puglisi article is about the Natives at the time of Jamestown, and rather than being just victims, and passive bystanders to the Europeans, a new theory sees the Natives as direct participants with their own political agendas. The second work is The Civic Solution to the Crises of English Colonization, 1609-1625, by Andrew Fitzmaurice, who is Chief Executive Officer at
Being the first two well-known places in which the English would set out to colonize in 1607 and 1620, Jamestown, Virginia and Plymouth, Massachusetts hold very separate set of beliefs, standards, and outlooks on life then and the future to come. While paving the way for things such as slavery, taxes, ownership of land, inclusion of women, tobacco and government assemblies, John Smith and the people of Jamestown became a classical foundation for new life and economic growth for the new world that is, the United States. On the other hand, William Bradford and his people began to realize the intentions of the Church of England were unholy and had strayed away from God’s teachings from the Bible. With this in mind, the Pilgrims set on a voyage to the new world to seek religious freedom. As we know it, the Pilgrims sought for peace and a new way of living that was fair, just and free from religious corruptions.
New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled largely of English origin, but by the 1700 the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. The difference in development occurred because of different religion beliefs, situations the colony was under, and different political views. Starting a colony wasn’t trouble-free. The settlers struggled with: starvation, lack of clean water, disease, and and indigenous people. Some settlers even disappeared almost completely, with the reasoning being unknown.
The puritans also made peace with the Indian tribes which was crucial for their survival. In comparison, John Smith and William Bradford were very different people. John Smith was a selfish man who only cared about himself and William Bradford cares about his people. Their judgment was different.
Although all the colonists all came from England, the community development, purpose, and societal make-up caused a distinct difference between two distinct societies in New England and the Chesapeake region. The distinctions were obvious, whether it be the volume of religious drive, the need or lack of community, families versus single settlers, the decision on minimal wage, whether or not articles of agreements were drawn for and titles as well as other social matters were drawn, as well as where loyalties lay in leaders. New England was, overall, more religious than the Chesapeake region. Settlers in New England were searching relief for religious persecution in Europe. Puritans, Quakers, and Catholics were coming in droves to America searching for an opportunity to have religious freedom.
A Model of Christian Charity is an important sermon written and delivered by Puritan leader John Winthrop on the Arabella while in route to the Massachusetts Bay Colony. It is important to American Literature for depicting colonial America as a “city upon a hill” and for being one of the first concepts of American Exceptionalism. The sermon also gives insight into the Puritan way of life, a religious ethic that would later contribute to the American ethic. Such morals include unity, charity, love, and communalism. A Model of Christian Charity is heavily influenced by Christianity and more specifically, Puritanism.
The Puritans do not take full credit for the people they have helped and saved and instead giving it all to God. The Puritans land at Cape Cod but are not pleased so they continue southward. After some rough waters, Bradford writes, “Being this arrived in a good harbor, and brought safe to land, they fell upon their knees and blessed the God of Heaven who had brought them over the vast and furious ocean, and delivered them from all the perils and miseries thereof, again to set their feet on the firm and stable earth, their proper element” (Bradford 80).The Puritans are constantly looking out for others, but it is not for personal gain. Bradford says that they survived and helped others for God and that he is the one who should be thanked. The Puritans show heroism by not asking for a reward and not boasting their accomplishments.
There are many factors that lead to a dual identity between the North American colonist and the British. One of the first factors during the 18th century was the colonial economy was growing rapidly. This was largely due to the immense immigration. The Dutch, German and Irish began to weave among the population. During this time, the colonial population was growing just as fast as the economy.
The New England colonies were first founded in the last 16th to 17th century as a sanctuary for differing religious groups. New England was made up of the Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire. New Hampshire, however, was formed for economic reasons instead of religious ones. The Chesapeake region, which is made up of the colonies of Maryland and Virginia, was founded by the British colonies for the purpose of farming. However, by the 1700’s, despite both being settled by Englishmen, New England and the Chesapeake region had developed differently.
The British colonies in the Chesapeake region and those of the New England region were both similar yet different in certain ways. One because both the colonist that settled there were looking for new opportunities. However, it was mostly second son aristocrats, which means the first born usually inherits the better half of the father’s riches. Their lives in England had either been mistreated or they were unable to flourish economically. Regardless of whether they were searching the land for expansive homesteads, religious freedom, or exchanging and merchant opportunities, the colonist in both regions were searching for another land in the New World.
American colonists had no thoughts about unifying the colonies. However, they had already developed a sense of identity. Colonists had many attempts to unify the colonies, but most failed. Before the beginning of the American Revolutionary War, English colonists developed their sense of identity, such as being an American, loyalist and patriot, and unity between the colonies. In the middle of the 18th century, colonists already developed a strong sense of identity.
Colonists who came to America differed greatly in backgrounds and settled for various reasons: Colonist in the New England Colony came to America primarily because they were religious reformers and separatist seeking a new way of life; the Middle Colony was inhabited by a tolerant and diverse group of people with different backgrounds; And the Southern Colony was mainly inhabited by English aristocrats, small farmers, and slaves. Because each colonial region inhabited different groups of colonists the social development differed greatly in each region. New England was founded on the Puritan faith and maintained a strong sense of faith, family, and community. New Englan was very strict on enforcing a strong sense Puritan religion, the lifestyle of colonist revolved around the puritan faith, so much so, it was referred to the "city upon a hill". Contrasting greatly with the New England Colony, the Middle Colony was greatly social and religiously diverse.
The two colonies differed politically. “God Almighty in his most holy and wise providence hath so disposed of the condition of mankind, [that]in all times some must be rich, some poor, some high and eminent in power and dignity, other mean and in subjection” (Doc. A).The New England colony was a representative democracy; they held town meetings. It placed emphasize on having poor and rich families because of the importance of an equal society with representation from all sectors of life. “We intend by God's grace, as soon as we can, with all convenient speed, to procure some Godly and faithful minister with whom we purpose to join in church covenant to walk in all the ways of Christ” (Doc. D).