Introduction
Both Carthage and Rome were growing and competitive powers that each dreamed of holding the supremacy. These two powers had their similarities and also great differences. In this paper, I will try to provide a brief history of Carthage, the power of Rome, comparison between Carthage and Rome, the Punic wars, and the creation and the power of Roman navy. The paper will therefore end with a conclusion stating my views.
The origin and rise of Carthage
According to Morey (1901), Carthage was a colony of Tyre which later became the capital of a great commercial empire on the northern coast of Africa. It rapid growth especially in trade paved the way for it to become a powerful empire founded on trade and commerce. As Carthage became the dominant power over the native races of Africa, which were the Lydians and the Numidians, she eventually forced many of them into slavery and continued her growth. With it trading power backed by slave labor and military power, Carthage could easily expand her empire into the North Africa region and the Iberian Peninsula. This expansion exposed Carthage to contact with other great powers including Greece and Rome.
The power of Rome
According to Trueman (2015), the Romans were not contented with the conquered land near Rome as they realized that land further away might also be very rich and can make Rome richer. The conquest of Italy still left Rome with a lot of energy and resources and she was bended to expand her empire. With
Armies began growing impacting the control over the Italian peninsula; launching three wars against Carthage. For example, the Punic wars were taken place to dominate the western Mediterranean. But, by the early second century BCE, Rome had control over the Mediterranean coastline. Transforming in the wave of production from agricultural being manufactured to mine goods. Roman’s build roads to creating towns but, was placed to control the flow of commerce.
Ali continued to conquer the Mali empire and surrounding states until their territory stretched to both sides of the Niger River. The position in which each civilization built their empire in allowed them to create and expand their kingdom in population, power, trade and religious
At the beginning of the first millennium CE, the Roman Empire began to conquer the territory around the Mediterranean Sea. Smaller countries feared the Roman Empire because of their great strength. The Roman Empire acquired great wealth, territories, and a reputation as a strong and feared empire. But, as time passed the problems within the Empire accumulated and the state of Roman Empire began to deteriorate before collapsing in 476 CE.
This sea also allowed for much more transportation for this empire. Along with trade Rome got much more control of new land which granted the empire a greater control over the surrounding areas. The new Romans made it possible for a new presence which assisted Rome in maintaining control of the region Ultimately the capturing of Gaul allowed for many new resources and new trade routes for the Empire. This empire needed to keep getting better with the new advantages that Gaul had given them because they had taken over such an important region like
It is evident that both empires each had their own set of similarities and differences in almost every single aspect. Priscus’ and Salvian of Marseilles’ writings show a slight look into what it is like to have lived during these crucial time periods in history. Each have their own set of views and understanding of their empires and how they each individually represented their nation as a whole. Times tells all wonders, in which Priscus stands up for his Roman culture and points out the faults of other nations. Meanwhile, Salvian of Marseilles accepts the mistakes of his people and the varying viewpoints of other arguments.
Rome aimed to expand its authority and control over surrounding areas, such as Italy and North Africa. Rome's conquest of these areas was motivated by a desire for territorial growth as well as by economic and strategic considerations. The goals of Sparta and Rome, however, shared some similarities. Both wanted to retain their positions of dominance in their respective regions, and both were prepared to use military force to do so.
Although this defeat created a huge setback for Carthage, she built up a new trading empire centered on Spain and however remained a powerful state. The Romans were not satisfied with conquering Sicily as they were prepared to embark on another battle to claim total victory. This led to the next war. THE STRENGTH OF CARTHAGEThe next war (Second Punic War) took
This was the commence of rivalry between Rome and Carthage with the goal of possessing the country borders on the Mediterranean Sea, having in count that Rome had acquired strength during the wars with the Latins, the Etruscans, and the Samnites, which created the foundation to confront the conflicts with Carthage, Macedonia, and Syria (Morey, 1901). Rome and Carthage were similar identical to their own strengths and resources, made them the two greatest rivals of the West, however, they were easy to compare, while Rome had a great organization. Carthage had greater wealth. Rome had a strong efficient army while Carthage had the most powerful navy. Rome had a strong body of loyal and faithful
Retrieved on 21st Dec, 2017, https://www.ancient.eu/Carthaginian_Government/ Jarus, O. (2012). Carthage: Ancient Phoenician City-State. Live Science. Retrieved on 21st Dec, 2017, https://www.livescience.com/24246-ancient-carthage.html Republican Rome. (n.d.).
The Roman empire was one of the most powerful or the most powerful empire in ancient times. A portion of this can be credited to its location in an area with good geography and climate. However, once the empire was vast enough its geography varied quite a bit. It went from the moderate climate of northern Italy too much warmer climates in northern Africa. In Italy, the central part of the empire, stood the city of Rome.
In this essay I will endeavor to examine Carthage and compare and contrast how its power rivaled Rome, I will look at the many similarities and differences in their way of life, and also how they came into conflict with each other. Carthage came into being in the ninth century B.C and traces its roots to the Phoenicians, who were a hardy race of sea farers based around the area of what is now known as Lebanon. They established many trading routes and partnerships throughout the Mediterranean Sea and even along the Atlantic coast. Carthage rapidly grew from a small port to a thriving trade hub and the epicenter of Phoenician commerce, this growth was accelerated by the arrival of many wealthy citizens of Tyre, the Phoenician capital, when
Fourth, Carthage was forbidden to raise an army or wage a war without Rome’s permission. Basically, after its victory over the Macedonians and a series of Wars, the Roman republic grew from a regional power into the super power empire of the Mediterranean. References Morey, William C. (1901).
Through this essay I will be discussing the comparisons and the contrast between temples in Greek architecture and roman architecture. I will be commenting on the forms, materials, technology and the siting to compare and contrast the architecture of ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. Also I will discuss how these points reflect the structure of the Greek and roman societies from which the temples emerged. Greek Architecture There were three main styles in Greek architecture, these styles were called the Doric style, Ionic style and the Corinthian style.
Ancient Rome left tremendous legacies such as technological advancements, religious beliefs and governmental structures that shaped the world today. The Romans conquered many territories and took on their cultures as well, in particular the Ancient Greek culture. Ancient Greek civilizations played a major role in the history and development of the Ancient Rome civilization. The Ancient Greeks influenced the social structure, religion and military strength of Ancient Rome.
Ancient Greek and ancient Rome are often confused with one another even though there are great differences between the two. Both countries are Mediterranean but have social class differences, different mythology, different life values and different architectural concepts. It is said that much of what Rome used in everyday life was taken from the ancient Greek civilization as the ancient Greek civilization started 5th century BC. And it was not till hundreds of years later that the roman civilization started. Cities in Ancient Greece were differentiated by hills.