While Chief Tecumseh and Chief Seattle come from different tribes, they both voice their fears and beliefs about the treatment they have suffered from the U.S. government. According to Chief Tecumseh “The way, the only way to stop this evil, is for the red people to unite in claiming a common and equal right in the land, as it was at first, and should be now -- for it was never divided, but belongs to all.” He uses ethos to convince people of his credibility to make them believe this will be the answer to end all this. He use ethos during “The way, the only way to stop this evil” making it seem as this must be the only way to peace. While Chief Tecumseh is trying to convince General William Henry Harrison throughout the whole speech to have …show more content…
The speech was written around 1810, and Chief Tecumseh was trying to get their land back, and the stop conflicts between tribes through emotional appeal, and ethos. He tried to show them that they were not savages, and they’re able to fix all the problems they caused. While in Chief Seattle “ A Letter To President Pierce” he said “We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs.”. In this quote he uses a metaphor comparing the white man to a thief, to show how to them the land is just a thing of value not importance. Unlike the speech Chief Tecumseh,who throughout the entire speech tried to make him feel mercy, and see he is right, the letter that was sent to President Pierce at 1855, used emotional appeal as well, but irony to poke fun at the idea that they are savages when the white man is doing all this. Chief Seattle hoped this would open his eyes, and change his ways by appealing to his emotional side, and to show how they were not
The document “Colonists Encroach on the Stanwix Line”, records a speech made by a Native American, John Killbuck to the governors of three separate English Colonies. He tells of the English and other European Settlers invading Naive American lands base on their own greed and compete against one another. The English haven’t always agreed on bringing about peaceful compromises on the lands they and other European Nations have conquered, instead, wars erupted and whoever were the victors reaped all the rewards, land that consisted of Native American tribes. The Native had tried to make a peaceful compromise of a land dispute by setting a boundary between Native American tribes and the English Colonies. However, with the increase of Europeans flooding
I think this quote plays a key role in Lanada Boyer’s article when getting her point across in her article; that Natives are a strong group of individuals, capable of overcoming any atrocity that the white man has created. The aforementioned quotation sparked a feeling of gratitude and a sense of belonging. Boyer used captivating words that allowed myself to be put into her shoes and subsequently experience (afar) the hardships that ‘relocation and termination’ program caused. Furthermore, in the midst of a bustling city complied of foreign people and technologies, in which Indians from the reservations had never seen nor used, unity was formed between these Natives. Unity is vital in the world for survival.
In Chief Tecumseh’s speech, he describes the tyranny and conflict between the united states government and the native peoples. He explains that the natives should not sell their lands, for they have no right to do so because the land belongs to all people and not one group. Tecumseh shows this when he writes, “Sell a country?! Why not sell the air, the great sea, as well as the earth” (L. 30). The air, the sea, and the earth are priceless in the eyes of many, he parallels these three with the selling of a country to demonstrate how the natives value their land.
In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,
Rebekah Michell Favassa Ferreira May 2,2017 3 Tecumseh ( Shooting Star ) Tecumseh was one of the first Indian leaders that desired peace with the settlers and pursued it. He was a leader with great power who could persuade people to come together and seek a higher good. He believed in joining all Indians under a single nation. His charisma was to gather many of the tribes together to negotiate for Indian land with the settlers.
Sydney VillacortaBuer 11/4/15 Contribution to U.S Roger Williams was a peace keeper, founder of a great colony and role model for the colonists and Native Americans when it came to respecting both sides and cultures. Williams believed in equality, so when he witnessed the Native Americans being disrespected, he was quick to react. This new author wrote a book called, “A Key into the Language of America.” This book introduced the Native American’s perspective.
Tecumseh quickly changed that thought whenever he created the Shawnee military alliance. In the article, it begins to give some opinions about Tecumseh and his leadership. The writer does say that Tecumseh was a good man and a decent war leader, but he also says that his leadership was questionable. Compared to the white man, Tecumseh did not have the education to be a good enough war chief. His opponents were able to out think him and out strategies him.
The second primary source is an online article by Michael Eidenmuller, “Tecumseh to William Henry Harrison” (1976). The author’s intention is to explain how “they have good reasons to believe they have ample grounds to accuse the Americans of injustice, especially when such great acts of injustice have been committed by them upon their race, of which they seem to have no manner of regard, or even to reflect.” The context of this source is to express how Native Americans were treated terribly unfair. The Native Americans did not want to create an incredible inconvenience between them, they just wanted the Americans to surrender their land. This source is unbiased, because it is not trying to force any one to take a side.
Tecumseh wrote down in a passage that the whites should respect him and that Native Americans own and deserve the land the white settlers are trying to steal from them. In Voices of Freedom, written by Eric Foner, Tecumseh writes that “The being within communing with past ages, tells me, that once, nor until lately, there was no white man on this continent” (153). After saying that, he follows with this, “That it then all belonged to red men, children of the same parents, placed on it by the Great Spirit that made them, to keep it, to traverse it, to enjoy its productions, and to fill it with the same race. Once a happy race. Since made miserable by the white people” (153).
Driven by the belief that space was bequeathed to them, the Native Americans feel justified in defending their land against the growing encroachment of the white man as the American landscape unfolds. Their motive is the premise that a higher authority has granted them the right to the space, and that the Great Spirit has created the landscape exclusively for them. Fueled by the formation of conflict over land, the Great Ottawa Chief, Pontiac, in his speech at Detroit, seeks to persuade the tribes, including the Ottawa, Huron, and Pottawatomi to agree to resistance. Invoking the words of the Delaware prophet, Neolin, Pontiac recounts the vision which he believes justifies resistance. Neolin urges the tribes to sever all relations to the customs
After watching Tecumseh’s Vision, I became more knowledgeable about the struggles Natives had to experience as western civilization occurred. Tecumseh was a trailblazer to his people and was a visionary. He was in favor of a strong Indian confederacy and was a strong Indian leader. As a result of rising tensions between the Shawnees and the Americans, it lead to a costly culmination of battles in order to claim Ohio land and westward expansion. Tecumseh’s legacy lives on and he is remembered for his leadership and courage to take on the Americans.
Frederick Douglass was a man of many talents. He strived to achieve what people would call the impossible, at least back then. Douglass was in fact an escaped slave who wanted to abolish slavery. His speech made national history in which he gave an emotional and sympathetic speech that thoroughly impacted his audience. He used multiple way in order to achieve this, like using metaphors, parallelism and antithesis.
Take Back Our land: Tecumseh Speech to the Osages “We must be united” was the plea from Tecumseh to the Osage tribe. In 1811, Tecumseh, known as the “Greatest Indian”, gave a speech pleading with the Osage tribe that they should unite together to fight against the white man (Tecumseh, 231). He goes on to tell how they had given the white man everything they needed to recover health when they entered their land but in return the white man had become the enemy. The speech to the Osages by Tecumseh illustrates the dangers of the white men to the Indian tribes, and why the tribes should unite together against the white man.
He achieved this by purposely neglecting the true horrors behind the removal of the Indians. Andrew Jackson portrayed the Native Americans as less than equal. The purpose of Jackson's speech was to justify his motives in moving the natives and to also convince congress that it was both beneficial to the Natives and the Americans. The source has value because it gives some insight into Jackson’s effort behind his motivation. Based on his purpose of speech, it can be learned that the relationship between the Natives and Americans was only beneficial for certain necessities.
Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.