In the following paper, I will be discussing the similarities and differences between two paintings. These two paintings are Jean-Léon Gérôme’s Bashi-Bazouk and Lucas Cranach’s Saint Maurice. The Gerome dates to 1868-1869 and was created with oil paints on canvas. The Cranach dates 1520-1525 and was created with oil paints on linen. The Gerome is 31 ¾ inches long and 26 inches wide, while the Cranach is 54 inches long and 15 ½ inches wide. The height of the Cranach makes the painting more lifelike, because it is almost as if the painting is drawn to scale. Both works portray soldiers. Through an analysis of elements and principles of art in both paintings, I will conduct a comparative analysis to show the similarities and differences in the way the soldiers are portrayed. The first design element that will be discussed is color. In both works, warm colors (mostly reds and oranges) are used to represent affluence and status. The colors contrasts with the dark skin of the soldiers. In the Cranach, the soldier is wearing a full suit of armor, which is detailed with intricate and colorful patterns. In the Gerome work, the peach silk top, shows a sign of …show more content…
In the Gerome, the clothing that he wears is silk. The fact that he has this clothing is such an expensive fabric shows that he was wealthy. His headpiece also shows this, as it is also made of silk. In the Cranch, the soldier shows his wealth through his armor and hat. His armor has a gold accents, which include a gold neckpiece that covers the entire neck. In the gold are stones such as diamonds and rubies. This shows that this soldier held a high position in his army. His hat also shows his affluence. At this time, big floppy hats like that were worn by the wealthy. Him wearing it shows that he has wealth and power. This is actually very interesting because men of his skin color were usually not put into high positions like general or
(Henry Holzer and the New-York Historical Society, The Civil War in 50 Objects, 81) A picture of the uniform is included on page 80 of Holzer’s book. It is easy to imagine how brave the men must have been to wear a uniform so bright and eye catching. This shows us just how important this cause was to them, and how proud they were of their ability. The Civil War was a very important event in the soldiers’ lives.
( Honour, p 14) The monk, a symbol of purity, could be the reason he painted the scene this way. At the moment the painting was being produced, The Crimean War was battled between Russia and France about the Russian Orthodox versus the Roman Catholic over privileges of churches in holy places in Palestine. (Britannica.com)Also during this time, The Second Empire of Napoleon was in process and education was being fought over between the state and
The two pieces of art that will be compared and contrasted are the Bull-leaping and Lascaux Cave. Both paintings have similarities and differences. The first difference is where the two are located. The Bull-leaping painting is located in the palace of Knossos in Crete, while the cave painting is located in the Lascaux grotto in France. The two pieces of art have similarities and differences in the setting, audience, artist, materials, scale, and function.
There was a cache of clothing found inside his tomb. One specific item was highlighted by the the scientists investigating his tomb. It was a corset made for him. These corsets were made to protect the lower abdomen. These were often used for people who hunted during winter.
He 's seen with antlers of a stag as well as carrying a purse filled with coins. At the
In front of this figure there are four standard bearers. The left most is supposed to represent some kind of animal skin, the second represents a dog and the ones after that represents falcons. People have interpreted this as the “emblems of royal house of Narmer, or of the regions that already belonged to his kingdom” (The Ancient Egypt Site). There is also a carving of a procession and if you look closely the enemies are decapitated with their heads between their legs, this signifies the fallen enemies of the king.
(118 Fitzgerald). People with old money are more successful because they can buy more things for themselves in order to be happy. Fitzgerald uses white as a symbol for the riches of the people who have been a part of East
In war, there is no clarity, no sense of definite, everything swirls and mixes together. In Tim O’Brien’s novel named “The Things They Carried”, the author blurs the lines between the concepts like ugliness and beauty to show how the war has the potential to blend even the most contrary concepts into one another. “How to Tell a True War Story” is a chapter where the reader encounters one of the most horrible images and the beautiful descriptions of the nature at the same time. This juxtaposition helps to heighten the blurry lines between concepts during war. War photography has the power to imprint a strong image in the reader’s mind as it captures images from an unimaginable world full of violence, fear and sometimes beauty.
As sure they get a stripe or a star they become different men, just as though they'd swallowed concrete... That's the uniform'' [2]The author points out how the uniform simply transforms a man. It gives them this idea of what a soldier should be; hard like concrete both in the outside and inside. Furthermore, the transformation also happens to the protagonist, Paul Baumer and how attached he has become to the uniform and its principals. When Paul and his comrades take off their armor, they feel like, ‘’now nothing remains to recall for me (Paul) the assurance and self-confidence of the soldier; no rifle, no belt, no tunic, no cap.
It can also signify that he has a stable ground of income that can support his giant needs. Another fact in the picture to prove both the previous statements is that on top of his crown
He used to raid wealthy empires from which he used to get large amount of jewelry. He was seen as a cruel man by many but he always took care of his crew as a leader he distributed gold, silver and diamonds equally with his crew members. He was also the most wanted criminal of his time.
A varied balance between the symbolic and realism has been struck world over by the painting. In the fifteenth century Western painting began to turn from its age- old concern with spiritual realities towards an effort to combine this spiritual expression with as complete an imitation as possible of the outside
The use of such unnatural colors and the presence of revolutionary minimalist strokes represent the key features of the “art of the beasts” and provoked agitation within the critics. The colours of the painting are the main characters
The helps convey the theme of courage because the blue background represents that the opposition team is powerful and the other side have no possibilities to win the war. It also show the seriousness of both sides as both sides are trying their best to win even though one side as extreme power. The black silhouette represent the evilness in the opposing side as it show that even though they know they are going to win they don’t stop killing. They even know they are killing people that can’t harm them in anyway. This helps show the theme of courage as it shows that it took a lot of courage to fight such a strong side in a instance battle.
He is the King of Sheba, and he carried the Frankincense given to Jesus. Frankincense is important for Catholics as it represents the prayers of the faithful rising to heaven. Melchior. Wearing a gold cloak is Melchior, the King of Arabia. He carried the gold brought to the infant Jesus.