Friar Lawrence, Capulet, and Juliet have made unwise choices and behaviors, leaving them at fault for the losses of the houses, Capulet and Montague. The main culprits never intended the results of their actions, but they were all punished in the becoming death zone. This unfortunate event caused by a dying love in this hopeless world full of hatred turns into a penalty for the terrors of two beloved children’s households. The extremities of the family feuds are tied by the impetuous, forced, and rash actions of Friar Lawrence, Capulet, and
This was like torture for Dimmsdale he even had to help in the shaming of Hester. He felt like his actions took meaning out of his life, he says this because how can he do his job and feel like he’s doing right among his people when he had committed adultery (ch. 11) Dimmesdale felt like a fraud and it made him so guilty and it tore his spirit and moral into shreds! He didn’t think he was capable of leading his people to salvation because of his actions (ch. 17).
When someone becomes an adult, they are forced to make decisions that not only affect themselves but affect others around them. These choices can be potentially volatile and can directly harm people who look to you for guidance. In the tragedy Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, Friar Lawrence fails to make thoughtful choices for others and makes careless decisions that hurt the people who trust him for advice. Throughout the tragedy, Friar Lawrence is characterized as a responsible priest; however, he finds it impossible to make reasonable choices, which causes the unfortunate demise of the lovers. As a direct result, Friar Lawrence’s decisions and reckless actions should be investigated for their deaths.
In conclusion, Old Capulet and Friar Lawrence should be punished and Balthazar should be pardoned. I know I gave enough evidence why the people I chose should be pardoned or punished. Even though Romeo and Juliet did their separate things away from these people, They still killed themselves because they couldn’t be with each other. The Montagues and the Capulets basically forced them to do this because they wouldn’t see each other once Romeo was banished. Even then they still couldn’t see each other because the families hated each
The horrendous outcome in the case of Dead Poets Society was the death of Neil Perry. Neil realized that life was not worth living if his ideas and dreams were regarded as insignificant. He fathomed the possibility of becoming an actor but instead he became his father’s pawn. This dissatisfaction clearly led to his own riddance. The shackles were too much for Neil perry and would be too much for any individual.
Jealousy and rage cause him to lash out and commit murder without giving the acts much thought. His inability to regulate his feelings and effectively process his experiences is what causes him to act so irrationally and take such drastic measures in order to cope with what are actually basic emotions. Likewise, Frankenstein also has trouble with his emotions. He, too, acted hastily when he first created the Creature and chose to abandon him and his laboratory in response to his fear and disgust. Later, the shame and guilt that he feels after the Creature commits murder cause him to reject his creation.
After Creon heard the horrible news something changed about him as he stated “ I killed you, my son, without intending to, and you, as well, my wife. How useless i am now. I don’t know where to look or find support. Everything I touch goes wrong, and on my head fate climbs up withs its overwhelming load,(1486- 1490) .” Creon’s disloyalty to his family brought him to his worst nightmare. He realize what a huge mistake he has done and regrets it.
Destruction of beauty in this story, “The Birthmark,” is developed through the use of symbolism, conflict, and irony. Aylmer’s obsession with removing the birthmark cost him more than he cared to imagine, the loss of his wife’s life. His fascination of perfection had killed their marriage before her soul departed from her body, not realizing that his lack of wisdom would cost him
Ignoren people and their actions have often horrendous effect on the people around them, and no one is immune. In the Greek Tragedy Oedipus, Oedipus’ fate and lack of knowledge and arrogance leaves him and his family in shambles. Upon finding out that he is not only the reason everything in his kingdom of Thebes is dying, Oedipus also realises that he's has inadvertently fulfilled a prophecy saying that he will kill his father and mary his mother. Driven to the point of extreme anguish his wife/ mother changes her self, upon seeing that Oedipus gouges his eyes out. Later on in Sophocles’ Greek tragedy Antigone Oedipus’ two sons have killed each other in battle before the play starts, and one of his daughters Antigone, ends up hanging herself because
Because of his lack of human appearance, society making something bad awake inside him rejects the monster. He started to take revenge of his creator by killing the people of the town and the ones that he loved. All of this would have been different if victor would have pay attention to the monster. To have a successful invention one must have responsibility and take care of
Primarily, Finlay focuses on his criticism on Davis’s imagination of reconstructing of the Martin Guerre’s story in order to make a dramatized story. He thinks that Davis should use only full documentary evidence instead of using her imagination. For example, she relies on the Coras’s book, and at the same time; on her intuition and assumption due to the silence in Coras’s text. She responds back to Finlay in her article “On the Lame” in which she notes the “difficulty in the historian’s quest for truth…” The key point here is there is no one single narrative in history, but rather many stories to be told, representing various experiences in the past, is surely foundational to the historiographical school of new history. Also, she defenses her style of writing the book because she wants to make it accessible to the reader not only in the schools, but also to the average person.
many times, these “abnormal" people repeat their actions, not only because they might enjoy their actions, but also mental problem block them understanding how horrible and extreme their actions really are. In the stories “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe and “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner, both Montresor and Emily they killed a man without significant reasons. In both stories, the main characters can easily be classified as psychotic, from their disturbing behavior patterns and the actions committed by both individuals. In the story of "Emily Rose". It is obvious that Emily 's mental is not normal after her father was dead.
The brother is to blame for doodles death. Doodle was a disabled young child with a selfish brother that only looks out for himself. His brother was ashamed to be with or around him. One of the biggest reasons wanted him dead is because he was embarrassed to be around him. The three reasons I believe that the brother wanted to kill doodle was he was embarrassed, he pushed him to hard, and he was selfish.
In conclusion, people in The Crucible lie for their personal interests, their tunnel vision haunts them in the sense that it comes back to get them in the end. This is shown by the fact that john died because he was not willing to live for false sins. In his shoes choosing to die was easy, choosing the harder right between the easier wrong is all depending on how you look at it. The consequences from the wrong choice will make your life harder while sticking to the harder right choice will make your life