Being one of the most controversial subjects in 19th century America, the argument on slavery led to one of the bloodiest wars in American History. As Southern concern rose on the abolishment of slavery, the secession of the Southern states was inevitable. Centuries later, people argued that the Civil War is described to be the Second American Revolution. In Lincoln and the Second American Revolution by James M. McPherson, he assessed on what truly defined a revolution and analyzed the Civil War in its 'external and internal means.' He began with Garfield's statements to discuss that as far as history predicts, the war was necessary for the nation to undergo a revolutionary change. From analyzing this article, the author intended to explain …show more content…
Garfield. Many radicals like Garfield were known to fight strongly for equal voting rights and equal distribution of land. By including European radicals such as Karl Marx, he mentioned that by the liberation of 4 million slaves, Marx viewed this as a “potentially world transforming ... revolutionary movement.” This version of thinking was also transparent in other European minds such as Thaddeus Stevens. He further takes his analyzation of the Civil War to Charles A. Beard. He employs Bread’s interpretation of the Second American Revolution and shows that the Civil War shared similar aspects of the Puritan Revolution. It can be compared to the Puritan Revolution in the sense that the Northerners attempted to remove the Southerners from power in the government. The author also applied Barrington Moore’s description of the Civil War as the colliding between two class systems and labeled it as “the last Capitalist Revolution.” In Moore’s mind, slavery was an outdated system and prevented the nation from establishing itself to be fully a capitalist democracy. However, several scholars argued that there was no political, …show more content…
The author mentioned several radicals such as Karl Marx and journalists like Moore and provided the reasoning behind their arguments. I was unaware that this kind of generalization can be made about the Civil War. I found that the battle between class systems to be interesting because it can be compared to many times in history between the proletariat and others. I was convinced that the Civil War can labeled as a Revolution because it produced a social change through violent means. However, I do find it convincing that the second American Revolution is not complete. As the Civil War represented the fight between labor systems and the shift of power, Africans Americans weren’t really free. As an immediate result after the war, they were subjugated to several laws and racism swept the
The Northerners, for instance, fought to defend state sovereignty (lecture December 8). Therefore, the causes of the Civil War remain a debate. Although one hundred and fifty-one years have passed, many historians still debate whether the cause of the war was slavery or not. Charles B. Dew in his essay, “Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War”, argues
Woodward brings up the influence the intense pressure coming from the North. During the Civil Right Movement, blacks could vote, hold an elective and appointed offices; this was the time of ‘experiment to rigid uniformity between the whites and the backs that will later come to an end. ”According to Woodward, during the years/decades affords the Civil War, there was no demand of the white population that the freed slaves be deprived and the “white supremacy” be considered as the “rule of the
Did Lincoln free the slaves, or did they free themselves? Many people would debate that Lincoln freed the slaves. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, stating all slaves in the rebellious state were free. This may have led to the slaves being freed.
Between 1860 and 1877 the Civil War began, presenting the people and politicians of the United States with a great number of constitutional challenges, which had been mounting for decades. Despite the efforts made, many changes in social conditions remained unjust and were disregarded. The constitutional changes that occurred contributed to a revolution but did not directly connect to any revolutionary social developments. The constitutional changes that occurred were far more revolutionary than social developments, through their changes in states’ rights, African Americans rights, and the federal government's influence in the social sphere.
The Civil War marked a moment in American history with the metamorphosis of the meaning of the concept of liberty into one of freedom of opportunity. By examining the war between the Union and the Confederacy, James McPherson, in his book, Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution, he illustrates the issues present in antebellum and postwar America. The author defends the belief that the Civil War was a second revolution through a detailed look at key issues during the time period treating employment, land ownership, and education, among others. The extension of power of the national government that resulted from the war and Abraham Lincoln’s persuasive efforts to end the divide between the North and the South, led to an expansion
For centuries, African Americans have always been treated as inferior; as lower-ranking citizens likened to the status of animals. The earliest settlers of The United States had African American slaves, as well as our early presidents. At the time this was just part of the status quo, everyone had their own slave to help them with daily life or to tend to their fields. Slowly over time, the margin of slaves and free blacks in the country began to shrink. African American began to fight for their freedom and equal rights, with all this tension coinciding with the political divide which resulted in the Civil War.
The Civil War is one of the bloodiest wars in American history, but what started it? What did it lead to? In the book, “Two Miserable Presidents”, by Steve Sheinkin, the author explains events that led up to the civil war and how they were finally resolved through the leadership of Abraham Lincoln. Throughout the book, we learn about the causes of the Civil War through anecdotes and we learn “everything your schoolbooks didn’t tell you about the Civil War.” He gives a humorous 13 step guide in ripping a country in two and names each section of the book a with a captivating yet true title.
The Civil War was a time period of social, political, and economic tensions. The North and South fought to decide whether to stop or continue slavery. Abraham Lincoln, the then president, addresses the two crowds before and after the war; however, in the second address, after the war, he uses specific literary devices to convey his message, of the need to end slavery. Abraham Lincoln uses varied sentence structure and appeals, in his succinct Second Inaugural Speech, to try to bring back harmony in the states and the abolitionment of slavery. Abraham Lincoln uses varied sentence structure to emphasize his message of harmony and abolition of slavery.
The fate of their country by Michael Holt is a book made up of 3 to 4 sections, titled Pandora's Box, The Wilmot Proviso, The Compromise of 1850, The Kansas-Nebraska Act. Author Michael Holt examines what caused the Civil War and the Pandora’s Box of sectional dissent territorial slavery issue over slavery into all current and future western territories also the Missouri crisis debate. It wasn’t slavery per the book but the debates about the extension of slavery into new territories and states that sent the nation careening into civil war, argues writer Michael Holt. He gives his readers an analysis of the partisan political forces, on the great debate over the extension of slavery into the American West.
The term “Revolutionary” is an instantaneous change or shift that promotes equal rights, liberty, and freedom. So, while some may argue that the revolution was a turning point for America, The American revolution in this case is not revolutionary since slavery was still present, minority groups did not gain rights, and British ideals and tactics were still being used in the new government. One of the crucial pieces of evidence that this “revolution” could not be considered revolutionary is because of the slavery still taking place even after the war ended. Throughout the revolt against British rule in the 16th century, the American people fought under the banner of truth, justice, and liberty for all people, However, the only people that indeed
After the efforts to gain independence from Britain and the creation of the United States of America, eighty years later this union was not so united. When the Civil War broke out in 1861, it was the first time that Americans fought Americans. Among many reasons, the Civil War is known to be a result of the arguments over the delineation of the States’ Rights or the presidential election of Abraham Lincoln. In actuality, the Civil War, the most deadly war in American history, was due to disputes over slavery in the American territories. Therefore, the Civil War was inevitable because of the consequences that occurred one being slavery.
President Abraham Lincoln, in his inaugural address, addresses the topic of the civil war and its effects on the nation and argues that America could be unified once more. He supports his claim by using massive amounts of parallel structure and strong word choice. Lincoln ‘s purpose is to contemplate the effects of the civil war in order to unite the broken America once again. He adopts a very hopeful tone for his audience, the readers of the inaugural address and others interested in the topic of American history and the civil war.
As the African Americans “freedom” is setting into everyone’s mind, the freedmen start to develop their own path. Foner states that the newly freed slaves wanted whites to understand that they no longer had authority over them and make their status as free Americans known by economic power, religion, self-defense, and political action that were some of the systems among their desire to leave black communities but were heavily altered by a lack of protection but continued and looked for other ways to pursue. With African Americans seeking different approaches, Foner argued that the efforts put in were brought together by a desire to gain independence from white control. Even before the war, Foner believes that the blacks had gathered other institutions even before the war has started and the emancipation enhanced the blacks resources. Though these resources were made available to the African Americans, Foner also discusses that because of the cultural intuitions did not free blacks from privations that which then led to Reconstruction to fail.
Before the civil war African Americans were enslaved forced to work on plantations. They were treated harshly, and faced many different hardships. This would change after the civil war, because they were granted their freedom. They were no longer forced to work on plantations, but that does not mean they were treated any better. After the civil war African Americans were still treated poorly and faced persecution for many years.
Rebellion Against Government Many words are associated with the word “rebellion.” These words may include “disobedience,” “anarchy,” “instability,” or “teenagers.” A word that should be included in that group is “justified.” Throughout history, people have often been deprived of the rights and freedoms that they deserve as citizens.