The fight for equality has been a long and complicated battle. Many people believe that Martin Luther King, Jr. was correct in his approach, but others believe that Malcolm X’s approach was best. Malcolm X believed in the goal of black people separating completely from white people using the method of violence in self-defense. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in the method of reaching equality through desegregation using the method of nonviolent resistance. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in very different viewpoints regarding the solution to the needs of and problems facing the African-American community in the 1960s, but King’s approach was best. Martin Luther King, Jr. utilized his beliefs in peaceful coexistence between …show more content…
In the 1960s, Malcolm’s approach would have been more effective in unifying African Americans. This is proven with Malcolm's answer in “Message to Grassroots” when he explains that,“if it is right for America to draft us, and teach us how to be violent in defense of her, then it is right for you and me to do whatever is necessary to defend our own people right here in this country. . . (4)”. Malcolm explains how African Americans should defend themselves at all costs, especially since white people expect African Americans to fight for them in war to overall defend white people as a whole. Malcolm’s approach would be best used in the 1960’s because many people, similar to him, were tired of a lack of change regarding equality for African Americans. People were desperate for change using any means necessary, violence included. African Americans felt like they had no voice, so they resorted to violence even if they didn’t have anyone to lead them. Malcolm X was eventually the leader that many African Americans looked up to in order to guide and be the voice they felt they never had. He was able to unify African Americans through their need for violence in place of their voice. On the other hand, King’s approach would be best in the present time. To contrast, In “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King proves how violence is unnecessary and continues expressing his belief by saying, “ Let us all hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our fear-drenched communities and in some not too distant tomorrow the radiant stars of love and brotherhood will shine over our great nation with all of their scintillating [sparkling] beauty. (4)” King proves how he feels that blacks and whites should have faith that they can peacefully coexist using nonviolence to
This book brings together some of the best primary sources on Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X that relate to what I’ve learned in history class. Through their writings and speeches, I appreciate the roles they played in the freedom crusade of the 1950s and 1960s. It is a good summary of its essential teachings that give me insight into their individual styles and personalities. The book is not one that tries to force ideas or a religion on the reader but instead offers new insight on two of these most important civil rights leaders of the century. It is a valuable effort that helps me both within and beyond the classroom, which focuses on the crucial years in the lives of quintessentially human
Martin Luther King Jr’s philosophy was surrounded by the idea that civil negotiation was key to mutual unity. But as King and his followers tried to negotiate with good faith, the political leaders always refused to oblige. He wanted
Notoriously, Martin Luther King Jr. has been the name of the civil rights movement, the one we all look up to in terms of the end of segregation. But, this respectable man was not the only one to take action in the name of equality, as another infamous speaker, Malcolm X, also drove the civil rights movement in a way of ferociousness and rage. This man, the head of the Black Nationalist movement, gave phenomenal speeches that indirectly propelled the civil rights movement, including Prospects For Freedom, By Any Means Necessary, and Message to the Grassroots. Malcolm X was a man who was an illustrious black nationalist, and was the speaker for the Nation of Islam. He often preached controversial things that regularly contrasted him with Dr.
In the pursuit of equality during the Civil Rights Movement, two main ideologies emerged: those of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X. These two men’s philosophies are usually viewed as complete contradictories. Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King hold the same end goal of rights for African Americans; however, their methods for achieving that goal differ. Malcolm maintained a more violent approach whereas King deemed that the best way to achieve equality was through nonviolent and peaceful practices. Additionally, Malcolm believed in the separatism of African American and white cultures, in contrast to King’s belief in the integration of black and white cultures.
Throughout the 1960s and 70s, the partakers of the Civil Rights Movement changed their views on how to achieve equality, although they faced multiple challenges, but throughout these difficulties I believed that Malcolm
" Malcom X did not like how African Americans were being treated in America, It was a problem and he realized that and knew it needed to change. In relizing this, Malcom X decided to fight for a change for African Americans in America as in paragraph 5 Malcome x stated, “I don't see an American dream I see an American nightmare" Malcolm X would not stop until change happened he did care what it took including violence, Malcolm X would never ask for a fight, but he would never back down from one in paragraph 7 Malcolm X stated “It'll be Molotov cocktails this month hand grenades
Malcolm X, a Muslim, believed in the power of self-defense and black nationalism. He advocated for the separation of the races and the establishment of a separate black nation. While Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. had different philosophies and approaches to the civil rights movement, they both shared a common goal of achieving equality and justice for Black Americans. They both recognized the injustices of racism and discrimination and worked to bring about social change through nonviolent
The 1960s was a period of many uproars. Black people were fighting for their right as human beings to have the same trust and laws that any white person had. During this era, two influential figures emerged as leading voices for the African American community, those two being: Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X fought for racial equality, and their differing philosophies reflected distinct approaches to achieving their goals. During the 1960s when American ideals centered around principles of democracy and progress, Martin Luther King Jr's nonviolent resistance philosophy became widely accepted as a sensible solution for promoting social equity through integration. Martin Luther King believed in achieving racial equality through integration rather than separation.
Unfortunately, the Vietnam War wasn’t the only concern for Martin Luther King Jr. at that time period. “Black radicals increasingly turned away from the Gandhian precepts of King toward the Black Nationalism of Malcolm X, whose posthumously published autobiography and speeches reached large audiences after his assassination in February 1965.” Malcolm X was able to challenge King’s nonviolent approach by emphasizing the idea of combating white aggression by any means that were necessary in order to defend the black community. He argued that Martin Luther King’s approach would not help the black people to defend from unhuman attacks of whites and that his approach postpones the solution to problems of black community. It was an American approach in history to get on that shady path of violence and King knew it perfectly, so he was “unpersuaded by black nationalist calls for racial uplift and institutional development in black communities.”
"Ruler asked blacks to win their legitimate place in the public eye by increasing sense of pride, high good models, diligent work and initiative. He additionally asked blacks to do this in a peaceful matter," The distinction is in Malcolm X and Martin Luther King 's experiences impacted their later perspectives. As a dark youth, Malcolm X was insubordinate and furious. He faulted the poor social conditions that blacks lived in on the whites. "His past ghetto life set him up to dismiss peacefulness and coordination and to acknowledge a solid separatist theory as the reason for dark survival," He even accepted at one time that whites were operators of the villain.
Martin Luther King Junior and Malcolm X were two leaders of their time that were committed to the struggle for civil rights and equality for black people. Despite their fight for the same struggle, they had different ideas about the best way to achieve these goals. Martin Luther King Junior believed that nonviolent protest methods were crucial in the pursuit of equality for all people in order to build a beloved community. King offers the best solution to the needs and problems of the black community over Malcolm X. Malcolm X advocated for violent protest methods whereas King’s means of non-violent resistance was the more effective way to bring about change all while promoting love and reconciliation against forces of evil. Martin Luther
Malcolm X reconsidered how many African Americans understood White America as a system of racial oppression which he thought they themselves can solve. Today, Dr. Martin King and Malcolm X as two opposite dogma in terms of today’s history. This misconception, breaches the influences of what each man (King and Malcolm X) had. Although, Martin Luther strongly believed in racial integration and Malcolm X himself believed in racial separatism and Black Nationalism.
He explains the hopes of his movement, as well as the ignorance of the people keeping racism unresolved. His speaks in depth of the lack of human rights, the fraudulent American government, and the unification of African Americans. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X’s childhood gives insight on their approach to freedom fighting as well as their similar message of uniting Americans; with their differences in conveying their message their contrasting legacy is shown through their writings. One’s upbringing has a large effect on their future. From an early age, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X’s life were very unalike.
MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.