Similarities Between Roosevelt's Relief, Recovery, And Reform

1017 Words5 Pages

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s approach to mend the Great Depression was more effective than that of the previous president, Herbert Hoover. Hoover and Roosevelt had contrasting ideas on how the Depression should be handled. Hoover was a republican businessman, who was brought up in a poor family and had worked his way to become financially affluent, while Roosevelt was a Democrat who came from a rich background. When the depression struck, Hoover was unable to provide suitable economical, political and social assistance to those Americans who desperately needed it most; this eventually resulted in the elimination of his presidency. Despite his affluent background, Roosevelt’s past struggles led him to develop compassion and earnest …show more content…

His approach consisted of new ideas and plans that would restore the calamity of the Great Depression, these provisions became known as the New Deal. The New Deal comprised of the 3 R's; Relief, Recovery, and Reform, they were introduced to address the problems of mass unemployment and the economic crisis. Governmental involvement allowed faster recovery of the economy by putting civilians to work through public work programs such as the Civilian Work Administration, and the Civilian Conservation Corps. This enabled relief to many civilians all over America, providing jobs and therefore dealing with social aspects. Recovery of economic failure was dealt with through the introduction of the Agricultural Adjustment Act and the National Industrial Recovery Act. Reforms targeted the causes of the Depression and sought to prevent it from occurring again, affecting political policies of the future. For example, Hoover immediately passed emergency legislation to restore confidence in the …show more content…

The constriction of the Hoover Damn occurred during the Great Depression, this was an opportunity for employment that attracted an estimated 20,000 men. This project provided a positive temporary solution for the unemployed, although this was only available to a certain audience of people. Hoover did however take many other steps in an attempt to stabilise the economy; unfortunately most were ineffective. For example he placed an even higher tariff on imports through the Hawley-Smoot Tariff, however it backfired as American goods became too expensive to buy in Europe, further contributing to the economic crisis. The programs in place for the public were small in scale and highly specific as to who could benefit, only a small percentage of those who were in need were successfully accounted for. In response to the Depression Hoover did put in the effort however the measures taken were too minimalistic and too late, therefore his actions were largely ineffective to solve the social, political and economic challenges posed by the Great

Open Document