Happiness cannot easily be found, as perspectives of happiness differ from one person to another. One of the ways in which happiness can be attained, is by constructing a utopia based on political and economic systems that work for everybody. Two main economic and political systems are capitalism and socialism. People developed both of these systems in an attempt to obtain peace, order and establish a better place for living. However, people have different views on which system is more successful. Capitalism is a system whereby a country's trade and industry are privately owned, and the distribution of goods is determined by the free market. Socialism on the other hand is a system where the distribution of goods is made by the community as …show more content…
In the kibbutz, there was no central government. People did everything together which included major decisions and discussions. They did not believe in having one person in authority. It was a government by the people, for the people. They wanted everyone to have a voice. They believed that majority decisions were the best ones. For instance, as stated in the Israeli kibbutz, "In all branches of the kibbutz economy, decisions concerning the daily running of the branch were made by the members working in the branch." (Zilbersheid 11). This gives everyone equal opportunity and opens up place for discussion and decision making. Moving to ownership, everyone had equal shares. Land, in the kibbutz, was equally disturbed among all members. Everything was basically owned and shared by everyone in the socialist communities. There were also collective payments for basic needs. Zilbershei states, "there are co-operatives in which the ownership of the means of production and of the means of distribution is entirely common" (8). This gives people a sense of equality and prevents the rise of social classes because all the people get equal …show more content…
There has to be a person in control to ensure that everything was going. The idea of having no central government may work for a small community. However, there are many countries, such as Egypt, with elected officials that are going on well. With this being said, having elected officials does not always ensure a stable country. Egypt, as an example, does not have that much freedom that was present in the kibbutz society. Moreover, common ownership can also have disadvantages. Some people might receive lands for farming and other lands for building a house. This is why as Zilbersheid states, "Common property, if not legally defined and really managed as property equally owned and controlled by all community members, can easily become a means of exploitation" (13). This means that common ownership should be dealt with carefully to prevent
Some people also complained about how the food was being distributed among members of the group. Even with the group differing among members, the brothers had a strict military style. Total control on the structure of the group kept things going. It kept the group united and gave people a better chance to survive. The problem of the population arose.
The people who owned more land paid more. The people who owned less land paid less if any at all. That is why Samuel Parris used the system to his advantage. Parris kept naming women for the girls to kill off by accusing them of witchcraft. These women, in turn, had the property that Samuel Parris could give to men who already owned more land.
This idea leads to people holding things off to the side and being lazy. Without a strict government tasks would not be accomplished. Some of the greatest thinkers and philosophers share the same ideas for example, Thomas Hobbes proclaims, “how human beings can live together in peace and avoid the danger and fear of civil conflict. He poses stark alternatives: we should give our obedience to an unaccountable sovereign (a person or group empowered to decide every social and political issue). In order to keep people civilized and on task a strict system of a government should be in place at all times.
The hunter-gatherer way of life highlighted equality and the sharing of resources. They depended on intense cooperation and sharing, along with a strong egalitarian focus. With egalitarianism being so vital, they believed that all members of their society were equal and should have equal rights. This approach to life deeply benefitted the members of these tribes. The main benefits of this type of society are a balanced power dynamic, a selfless sense of community, and preservation of resources through sharing.
Systems of government are ensured to maintain structure in order for nations to develop significantly. Various systems are supported by different political principles, ideologies and distinctive ways of leading a civilization. Governments are formed to provide economic security for the welfare of their inhabitants and protect people’s rights. (Oak) Republicanism and absolute monarchy are examples of two contrasting systems due to their own strengths and weaknesses. Burkina Faso accepted a parliamentary republic but recently faced civil political tensions.
A Marxist Dystopia The Great Depression is infamous for being the largest economic crash in United States history. People declared bankrupcy, price jumps shocked Americans and companies laid off thousands. The Depression was a time of struggling for many Americans, but it had implications that were greater than simply the economic sense. Scarcity created by the Depression outlined the greater power structures at work in American society.
According to the Chambers Concise Dictionary (2009) Capitalism is defined as “An economic system based on private, rather than state, ownership of businesses, factories, transport services, etc., with free competition and profit-making.” And Socialism is defined as “A political doctrine or system, which aims to create a classless society by removing the nation’s wealth (land, industries, transport systems etc.) Out of private and
These leaders are selected through a process known as “the lot” (Amish Studies) where they go through a list of objectives that get them selected as a leader. The main reason the Amish religion is so intriguing is because of the lifestyle they live. When you see how they dress, both men and women, or how they live their lives, it definitely grabs your attention. Today it seems everyone is connected through technology, including the most basic things such as farming.
Therefore, the government is run by elected officials. This is significant because, in a pure democracy, the members are constantly implicated in the governing process. An example of this is in Switzerland, where there are elections consistently and almost every week.
Society has been struggling to find order ever since its conception. The idea that perfection could be achieved has long been dismissed, but societies still strive for something at least resembling functionality. Some of the fundamental problems faced within the genesis of a nation stem from the establishment of a government. How would one control and provide for the citizens in an effective way? Why would anyone willingly submit to governmental control?
Israel Much like the United States, Israel has a system of checks and balances. However, their parliamentary democracy has slight variations to the United States government structure. One strange fact about Israel is, they have no formal constitution. They do not have a written document unlike the United States, France, Canada and many more. But they are not the only nation to not have a formal constitution because countries like Great Britain, and New Zealand, also does not have a formal constitution.
No matter where we come from or what religion we base our beliefs on, we are all just regular people run by a higher authority that makes up a system called government. Government has been a key aspect for all human beings that lived in the past or are currently living in the present. We carry on day to day but one thing we never realize is that the government is taped into our lives and is not going nowhere for a long time. Government is the process in which a group of people come together to form a stable and peaceful society in which they have more power and authority over others. It is also the process used to gain more power and economic strength to build up a society.
Assignment 1 History proves to us that no society and no area are completely the same. Each individual has their own ideologies on how a country should be run and what form of government best suits their needs. It can range from enormous amounts to government control to absolutely no form of law enforcement at all. There is no way of really telling what is best, for not one is completely perfect. They all have their positive sides accompanied with their share of issues.
ABSTRACT : A number of political philosophers put forward theories related to the perspectives of the state. One of these theories is the theory of Anarchism. The basic principle on which the theory stands is that society exists without the state, a society which is based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups . The origin of the idea of Anarchism can be traced back to several years Before Christ.
Section 1: DISCUSS forms of Government (Do not quote, or give definitions) A. Communism: Under communism, the economy is controlled by the state. A single authoritarian party holds the power over the government. Communism is based on the belief of common ownership over the production of resources and the elimination of social classes (!). In that social order, all goods are shared among the people.