Throughout the two speeches both Susan B. Anthony and Shirley Chislom both speak about women's rights yet their perspectives are from two completely different times, nearly 100 years apart. Though they were both significant pieces to the puzzle of feminism they fought at two completely different times in our nation Shirley Chislom spoke in 1969 during the last wave of feminism. While Susan B. Anthony spoke in 1873, during the first true wave of feminism. Both females bring in some key components to argue why women should have the same rights as men and both women were huge in the feministic eyes of our nation. Susan B. Anthony spoke with an intense account of logos as she uses the United States Constitution to compel her audience to acknowledge …show more content…
Anthony also pursues the fact of how mocking it is to the women when they are essentially imprisoned in their lives in our nation yet get no say in it. She also brings a religious aspect into her speech where she says that all are equal in the eyes of their creator and have constitutional rights including the right to life, liberty, and happiness. Anthony was a wise woman in the way she spoke to her audience as she keyed in on ideal matters during her time. On the other hand, Shirley Chisholm was a woman that wanted fair jobs, she disagreed with the fact that jobs were only for men and not women. She uses a demanding tone within her speech to push the point across that women deserve to have the same rights as men. She uses words that demand urge the listeners to focus on what she's saying. She truly pushes her point across with statistics like “3.5 million more women in the United States than men, this situation is outrageous” (Chisholm, 1969). She keyed in on an intense number to show the population and the work environment. Chiohlm then continues her point by saying an ambitious sentence that states “That one sex needs protection more than the other is a male supremacist myth as ridiculous and unworthy of respect as the white supremacist
“I think that ‘twixt the negroes of the South and the women at the North, all talking about rights, the white men will be in a fix pretty soon” (Truth). Right off the bat she introduces her intention of finding harmony among everyone men, women, blacks, whites. Finally she ends the speech with a powerful tool for inspiring her audience to act on this topic of inequality, saying “ if the first women God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back, and get it right side up again!” (Truth). Saying that if these women stand together for what they believe, for what they feel is right they cannot fail.
Armed with Anthony’s facts, Stanton prepared the text for the speeches Anthony gave.” “A Powerful Partnership” credits work detailed in “The Birthplace of Women Rights” as inspiration for Anthony’s effort shift from prohibition to women’s rights. Arguably, without Anthony, Stanton wouldn’t have gotten the attention and support of all women and men to solve the problem at hand. “The Birthplace of Womens Rights” highlight Stanton’s struggles to even coordinate the unlocking of the venue for her first event. Anthony’s ability to organize the events and appeal to sympathizers was key to their efforts, but together, the women made lasting impact, inspiring not only other females, but the nation as a
Imagen what the world would be like if Martin Luther King Jr. and Susan B Anthony never presented their impactful speeches that changed history. For one component life would be more restricted and filled with violence and discrimination. Women would still look upon from a society point of view as weak and less than a man. The US constitution might even be changed to favor men. African Americans or any other race, of color, would be in fear, persecuted, and separated from the rest of society.
Moreover, it highlights a crucial principle. The First Amendment right is specifically evoked to depict an equal representation to all, and Stanton objectifies this statement in view of the fact that this is not applied to women. Women are excluded from having any political role in society and, during that time, were “housewives”. This can relate to the sexism involved when a woman has a voice in political debates. Usually prejudice causes women to be seen inferior and less capable than compared to men and that is unjust.
However, when thought of, most people remember her contributions to the women’s rights movement. She, and other feminists such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, began to realize that there were numerous similarities between slaves and women. Both were fighting to get away from the male-dominated culture and beliefs. In 1848, these women began a convention in Seneca Falls, regarding women’s rights(Brinkley 330). They believed that women should be able to vote, basing their argument on the clause “all men and women are created equal”.
Thousands of women have screamed at the top of their lungs, clawed at the patriarchy, and tirelessly fought for their rights as citizens of the United States of America. From the beginning of mankind, women have been labeled as inferior to men not only physically, but mentally and intellectually as well. Only in 1920 did women gain the right to voice their opinions in government elections while wealthy white men received the expected right since the creation of the United States. A pioneer in women’s suffrage, Susan B. Anthony publicly spoke out against this hypocrisy in a time when women were only seen as child bearers and household keepers. Using the United State’s very own Constitution and Declaration as ammunition, Anthony wrote countless
Throughout the 1800s, women fighting for their rights was an essential part of history. It made men realize that all women and people of color were equal. It only took two incredible women to change men's perspectives. Sojourner Truth and Susan B. Anthony made incredible speeches, “Ain’t I a Woman” and “Women's Right to Vote.” These women used word choice to convey the central ideas of their speech, and raise the impact.
The essence of the speech relies on Chisholm’s fundamental ability and her own personal
Anthony’s speech was well thought through and it gave off a positive connotation. She argued not as an odd one out but as a fellow citizen. Susan B. Anthony’s claim was that women’s right to vote was not a crime, but she was just exercising her rights as a citizen. She also stated that “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.” here she also used undeniable facts to prove her point.
In 1974 Shirley Chisholm was picked to be the keynote speaker at a national conference for black women at the University of Missouri. In her speech "The Black Woman in Contemporary America" Chisholm expresses to her audience that black women are not interested in being addressed as "Ms." or in gaining more control over things than males, but rather African American women's top priority is the well-being of their families and communities. Being that this speech was giving during the era of the Civil Rights movement, Chisholm criticized white feminist. While she went into depth of how important it is for black and white women to unite around issues such as equal treatment, women's rights, and better job opportunities. The main focus of this speech
In her speech, “For the Equal Rights Amendment” Shirley Chisholm addresses her views on securing women’s equality to ensure women have better opportunities. She is an American politician, educator and author that became the first black woman elected to the United States Congress. Chisholm supports her claims about equal rights for women by using examples of statistics to prove a point. Her purpose is to persuade her audience that women in America are neglected by equal rights and excluded from things that men are not. Throughout her deliverance she expressed an inspiring and informative tone to uplift her audience so that Congress can make a change for women.
Considering that there are about 3 ½ million more women in the United States than men, this situation is outrageous.” (Page 1) Chisholm also uses logos in her speech by stating the faults in the fight for equality. Chisholm also compares the fight for the equality of women to one of African Americans in the United States by suggesting that both groups are having an unkempt fight in the same areas. Chisholm states, “It is true that part of the problem has been that women have not been aggressive in demanding their rights. This was also true of the black population for many years.
Throughout Carrie Chapman Catt’s speech, she states that Susan B Anthony was a profound leader and supporter of the fight against women's suffrage. She speaks about controversial topics Anthony was exposed to during this time of hardship and the unfair acts that women had to deal with on a daily basis. Catt describes Susan B Anthony’s fight for the women’s right to vote as she states, “she never knew defeat”. These singular four words show the emotional connection Anthony had and the support she showed for women during this time period. Carrie not only defended and supported Anthony’s legacy with powerful stories and words, but she provided another step in the right direction for women’s rights.
However, this is incorrect because the preamble says, “We the people”, and society should be thought of as a whole and should not be divided based on gender. In Anthony’s speech she says, “It is we the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we the male citizens; but we, the whole people, we formed the Union.” Anthony demonstrates how everyone is a person and the constitution clearly states that everyone should be equally treated, and people should not be discriminated based on gender or race. She explains how the citizens of the United States are supposed to be treated as a whole and are not supposed to be separated based on unnecessary factors. She uses logic and reasoning to get to the audience and tell them that constitution and preamble were written to help the country not divide it based on gender and race.
Susan B. Anthony, a woman who was arrested for illegally voting in the president election of 1872, in her “On Women's Right to Vote” speech, argues that women deserve to be treated as citizens of America and be able to vote and have all the rights that white males in America have. She begins by introducing her purpose, then provides evidence of how women are citizens of America, not just males by using the preamble of the Constitution, then goes on about the how this problem has became a big problem and occurs in every home in the nation, and finally states that women deserve rights because the discrimination against them is not valid because the laws and constitutions give rights to every CITIZEN in America. Anthony purpose is to make the woman of America realize that the treatment and limitations that hold them back are not correct because they are citizens and they deserve to be treated like one. She adopts a expressive and confident tone to encourage and light the hearts of American woman. To make her speech effective, she incorporates ethos in her speech to support her claims and reasons.