Similarities Between The State Of Nature And Civil Disobedience

1345 Words6 Pages
Civil disobedience rejects the idea that if one wishes to live in a certain society, one must obey that society’s laws and policies. The social contract theory is the agreement among society to put in place moral and political governing rules of behaviour in order to form the society in which they live in. According to John Locke, the State of Nature is where people live together in the state of complete liberty to conduct the best fitting life for oneself. Furthermore, the State of Nature has no governing body which results in an anarchy, where a society is unable to exist. The State of Nature assumes everyone to be equal as well as that each person possesses their own natural rights. This means that there would be a society with no education, property, healthcare, goods, or services. Ultimately, the State of Nature could easily evolve into the State of War over property disputes where people’s rights would be in danger as Locke states, “If man in the state of nature be so free; … absolute lord of his own person and possessions; equal to the greatest and subject to nobody, why will he part with his freedom? Why will he … subject himself to the dominion and control of any other power? To which it is obvious to answer, that though in the state of nature he has such a right, yet the enjoyment of it very uncertain and constantly exposed to the invasion of others … and the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very insecure. This makes him willing to

More about Similarities Between The State Of Nature And Civil Disobedience

Open Document