As the world of global exploration and colonization grew, many powerful European empires set out to see what the New World had in store for them. Each empire had their own individual agendas and incentives for colonization. This led to the many differences between methods of colonization and exploration in every colony and region. The Atlantic World portrayed these contrasts between the Spanish, French, Dutch and British empires. However, the British settlements along the Eastern seaboard differed the most from those of other empires because there were no established policies or methods in British colonization, which led to differences in the economics and culture of each colony depending on who settled it.
In terms of political and social structures, manorialism and feudalism were two major ones in Western Europe. Manorialism was a system of reciprocal economic and political obligations between landlords and peasants. Most individuals were serfs living on self-sufficient agricultural estates, also known as manors. In return for protection, they gave lords part of their crops and provided labor services. (p.215) Years later, Western Europe became very prosperous, and this prosperity promoted political change, influenced by structures established in more unstable times.
Both peasant and noble women wore stockings and tunics. The peasants required land to farm, and the noble’s wealth was based upon what a peasant farmer could grow. Even though a noble’s diet is considerably more rich and nutritious than a peasant’s diet, it was likely that both social classes died at young ages due to sickness and
Conclusively, the battles created more struggles in the English Throne than before the conflict began. There have been other family feuds in history that are just like The Wars of the Roses. Even though they are all different, each feud proves that fighting doesn’t resolve disagreements. The Wars of the Roses involved an unnecessary family feud for the English Throne that caused after effects following the wars. Both houses claimed to have a right to the English Throne, which started the inner rivalry between the families.
For example, back then women had just been allowed to vote. This was a huge change for that time, and changed the course of history. Also, wives could not own a property; it all belonged to their husbands. Today, women have fought for, and acquired much more freedom in regards to rights and freedoms, such as being allowed to vote, being allowed to own property, and having more power over their own decisions. Thirdly, most wives in the late 19th-20th century didn’t have much of an education, because they were forced to stay home and take care of domestic tasks.
4.Feudalism did not allow one person or organization to become too powerful. Power was shared among many people and groups. This was the first step to European ideas and limited government, constitutions, and civil rights.
Feudalism was a key component of life for those in both Western Europe and Japan. The two systems developed independently from each other yet still held a multitude of similarities. However, their many differences out shadow the unique parallels they shared. The major discrepancies between the two are found in each’s code, structure and regulations. Documents nine and ten, break down the feudal structures of Western Europe and Japan.
The knights were the ones who protection everyone in the kingdom. The last people on the pyramid was the peasants, which paid rent and farmed the land (they really didn 't get a lot of respect). Similar to Source B, Source C states there were trade routes, so that people can trade gold and salt. Also, the territory were getting taken over. The last thing is that the dates were also getting taken over.
Women had little to no say in anything in their personal lives as well as politically because they did not have the right to vote. However, in the mid 1830’s to 1840’s, different moral reform movements such as temperance, sexual morality and abolition swept the Middle-Atlantic
As the lowest in the social hierarchy, serfs, one of the two classes of the peasantry, were also an integral part of feudal society. Serfs agreed to serve the lord because what they received in exchange fulfilled their needs. It was dangerous for them to live alone in the countryside where bandits could kill, attack, and steal (Ahlin 1). Peasants who could not defend themselves agreed to become serfs in return for the protection provided by the lord, which allowed them to live behind his walls in safety (Ahlin 1). In addition to this military protection they received legal protection and the right to draw water from the lord’s rivers, cut trees from his forest, and use the pastures (Nardo 25).
Have you ever wondered if there was really a difference between the Samurai and a Knight and if not what are the similarities? Some people may think there are more differences than similarities but the reality is they are more of the same than different. They are actually very alike. These two places Japan and Europe are going through very similar problems. They are fighting each other because neither of them were very stable in the medieval times.
The knights had a code they lived by. Honor, bravery, chivalry, and courtesy. This code was called knightly chivalry. The monarchy also brought the artisan class and changed the attitude toward the church and religion.
Whenever the peasants of Medieval Europe got mad at their king they usually resorted to revolution. William Wallace is a legendary Scottish hero.
In some rare cases, people outside of nobility could be knighted when they are awarded from a lord. Before children are trained to become a knight they are cared by until the age of 7 at the castle or manor. Then they are given the title of page and are taken care of by their lords. During training period they are taught by hunters to hone their abilities and educated with academic studies by priests or chaplains. Once at the age of 14 or 15, they are bestowed the title of squire.