After being asked for forgiveness by a dying SS soldier, Simon Wiesenthal poses the final question of the novel, “what would you have done?” to his readers. It rings in the ears of the global audience as they try to imagine how they may have acted in Simon’s impossible position. I’d have done exactly as Simon did. Leave without a response. Karl, the SS soldier on his deathbed who begged forgiveness of Simon, requested forgiveness from ANY Jewish person. This small choice could be proof that though Karl claims to feel remorse for his crimes, he still saw Jewish people through the lens of the Nazi party. He committed horrific acts, but Simon was not the victim of HIS crimes. Karl likely saw Simon less as one member of a persecuted minority, …show more content…
Never. To have truly seen his guilt would have been to know himself as utterly dispossessed of all chances for forgiveness.” (pg 151.) By asking to be forgiven for what he did that day in the burning building full of Jewish civilians is enough proof that he did not fully comprehend the nature of his actions. The closest Karl could have gotten in his short life to atonement would have been to die silently with the guilt and images of his victims in his mind without inflicting those memories on anyone …show more content…
Karl did not deserve closure by any stretch of the imagination. By dying without that closure when Simon leaves the room silently, Karl had the opportunity to bask in the only punishment for his crimes that he would ever experience. Simon gave him that. In Simon’s place, I would have done exactly as he did. Karl’s confession did not truly warrant a response at all. By requesting that the nurse “bring him a Jew, any Jew will do” he forfeited his right to a response from Simon as it proved immediately that he cared more about dying in peace than repenting and facing his guilt. Perhaps forgiveness, at this point in history and in the aftermath of World War II, is not the issue at hand anymore. Maybe now that the vast majority of the people who committed and experienced these events firsthand have died, the issue at hand has become whether or not descendants of the victims are given a fair chance to live without anger that boils and gradually becomes thick like blood, and if descendants of the perpetrators will continue to hear the echo of evil that once indoctrinated their communities so wholly that humanity in the face of instability was
This article teaches others the importance and significance of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, founded by Rabbi Marvin Hier in 1977. When the Memorial was first established it was supported by 380,000 members. The Memorial played an important part in investigating into the Prosecution of Nazi Collaborators around the world and persuading other countries such as Canada, Australia and Great Britain to continue to investigate to search for escaped criminals, in order to go through prosecution for their actions that happened many years ago. To reach out to even more people, documentaries, interviews, books, publications and exhibits are also there for further interest, including the Oscar award winner for the best documentary, Genocide. The memorials
I believe Karl's primary motivation for confessing to Simon was that for Karl's own sake, and peace of mind, he wanted to see a "Jew", any Jew, so that he could die in peace. Karl is unable to see the suffering of others due to fact he is blinded by his own suffering, he is unable to see the suffering of the Jewish people he participated in murdering and the ones that still haunt him. He confessed because he wanted to be at peace with himself, I see that as his prime motivation for telling Simon what he did. I interpreted Simon's silence as he was having an internal moral struggle with himself, unsure of whether or not his silence was right or wrong since the Nazi whose bedside he was at was dying. I don't think Simon had the authority to
This allowed Thornton to encapsulate every aspect of his characters identity which truly brings Karl to life. While there does not seem to be much going on inside the mind of Karl, there is definitely more going on than first meets the eye. His parents believed he was a punishment sent from God, which is why he was shunned and condemned to the confines of a shed as a child. Little did Karl know how much of an impact he would make on the world as he sat in his shed and stared at the ground. Without having killed his first two victims, Karl may not have survived long having to depend on his unloving family.
As a Prisoner of 5 concentration camps, Simon was placed under many mental and emotional hardships including exposure to death & suicide attempts. At the Brigidki Prison Simon was forced to watch the mass murder of Jewish victims. In the Prison the Jews were ordered to form a row, face the wall and cross their arms behind their necks, and then an SS guard began to shoot at them. Wiesenthal fortunately escaped the shootings and was taken to his cell; he thought of the dead and envied them because he believed that death was a better alternative. During Simon’s time as a prisoner in the camps, he experienced extreme loneliness due to being separated from his family and friends.
To demonstrate this Wiesel writes, “A prayer formed inside me, a prayer to this God in whom I no longer believed. "Oh God, Master of the Universe, give me the strength never to do what Rabbi Eliahu's son has done."”(91). This quote continues to demonstrate how the variation in religious views can be a drastic and sometimes emotional roller coaster in terms of what you do or don’t believe in. I believe these types of decisions can especially come out when in very dire and trying circumstances where it really tests what you do or don’t believe in especially if it’s something that will drastically affect your life. Our final example deals with Wiesel and the other Jews getting up to continue running as instructed by the SS guards, they wake to find many of them perished overnight, “The dead remained in the yard, under the snow without even a marker, like fallen guards.
If the young boy had gave into all the torture and torment and told the SS officers the information they desired, he would’ve been killed on the spot– once the information was received, the SS officers no longer had a use for him. But his persistence postponed his sealed fate, even if it were only a couple of days. After his execution, the other inmate’s doubts and questions towards their God began to grow. His death also solidified Wiesel’s loss of faith and religion. In order to delay his eventual death, the young persisted with silence even when faced with inhumane
For instance, the Germans' use of human ovens on page 25 left the Jews feeling so helpless that they recited the prayer of death for themselves, an unprecedented occurrence in Jewish history, “I do not know if it has ever happened before, in the long history of the Jews, that people have ever recited the prayer of the death for themselves.” This quote reveals the Germans' ability to inflict generational trauma on the Jews by leading them directly to their death, stripping them of their identities and leaving them without hope. It sheds light on how the Germans' actions resulted in the deaths of millions of Jews and destroyed their sense of identity and belonging. Consequently, the Jews losing their faith, as seen on page 49, where Wiesel questions his own reality and expresses his outrage, frustration, and despair at the atrocities committed by the Germans,“Why, but why should I bless Him? In every fiber I rebelled.
Elie Wiesel’s harrowing memoir of his personal accounts during the Holocaust recounts the dehumanization and brutality endured by those persecuted within the camps. Despite this, Wiesel reflects on the moments of compassion and consideration of other individuals even whilst enduring atrocities and how these instances of altruism can serve as a form of resistance against the Nazi regime. Ultimately, Wiesel exhibits throughout his novel that individuals who were once unified can turn into savage and immoral beings within places of brutality. Wiesel demonstrates that humans can still be sympathetic and exhibit decency towards others even whilst enduring atrocities. After Eliezer endured public humiliation and punishment by Kapo Idek, a French
The SS officer yelled at him, “‘Listen to me you son of a swine!’ said Iked coldly. ‘So much for your curiosity. You shall receive five times more if you dare tell anyone what you saw! Understood?’” (Wiesel, 58).
During World War II, many people remained neutral or indifferent to the atrocities that were happening around them. However, the words of Elie Wiesel serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of taking action in the face of injustice. In his quote, Wiesel swears never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation, emphasizing the importance of taking sides and never remaining neutral. As an American citizen, I reflect on what I would have done during the war and what different life choices I would make in the future. It's easy to say that I would have resisted the Nazi regime, but it would have taken immense bravery to do so.
For the rest of Simon’s life he remains tormented by Karl’s apology and even asks his readers at the end of The Sunflower to ask himself: “What would I have done?” (98) When we respond to this question, we have to keep in consideration the amount of atrocities and suffering the Jewish population went through. I feel that it is not our right to deeply forgive another for their sins. To forgive by word of mouth seems to me to be so superficial. A deeper forgiveness does not come from us but from God.
I wanted to return to Sighet to describe to you my death so that you might ready yourselves while there is still time... I wanted to come back to warn you. Only no one is listening to me... This was towards the end of 1942”(7). The pattern of faith and belief in Elie Wiesel’s Night is intertwined with the pattern of denial the Jews have throughout the book.
His head wrapped in bandages his body so thin his bones stick out, he reaches for Simon's hand and says, “I am resigned to dying soon, but before that I want to talk about an experience which is torturing me. Otherwise I cannot die in peace.” The member of the SS, tortured by his murderous crimes, seeks forgiveness from a Jew, any Jew. “I cannot die...without coming clean. This must be my confession.”
The novel Unbroken is set in Torrance, California in the summer of 1929. Louis Zamperini is a twelve-year-old delinquent who is struggling to find his way as an Italian immigrant in a small town. The theme of redemption and forgiveness are shown throughout the book and in each area of Louie’s life. Every aspect of Louie’s life shows how he redeems himself and how the ultimate act of forgiveness is the most powerful resource for redemption.
He also wanted to tell the reader about his life as a Jew in a concentration camp and the horrors he faced. He wanted us to think about what we would have done in his place and what forgiveness means to us. After he published his book, he asked certain people to respond to the story and what they would have done in his place. Some people are Jews, some are Christians, some are young, some older, some were even part of the war. Everyone who wrote an essay was different from the rest in some way, but they all had one connection, Simon.