In the first place , Simone de Beauvoir describes ambiguity (human ways of thinking about life) through the following categories: nihilism, cynicism, humorism, seriousness and adventurism. In the light of “ existentialism” de Beauvoir makes an implication that there is no difference between philosophy and life. In like manner, she's also aware there are wrong turns that can be taken through the journey of questioning one’s own life. For instance,one way to face ambiguity of human life is “nihilism” this can be described as the drawing for obliviousness at the same time turning everything into an objection, lacking importance or significance as well as the exclusion of all values. Again “nihilism” is the view that nothing really matters, which …show more content…
Nevertheless, de Beauvoir believed there was way of denying the ambiguity of human life that happened more commonly, she named it “seriousness”. As an illustration de de Beauvoir believed that this was common since we began life as children. Moreover, as children we come to a universe that has been established before us. Accordingly, we also look up to our parents as “divine” beings, and we always look for their approval in all things that we perform. Then, as we get older we have rules that limit our human instincts because we solely believe that we are “adults” and have to behave with maturity. With a similar sense of mistake there is “adventurism”, on the contrary to “seriousness” where life has many limitations, in “adventurism” life has no limits and one can explore concepts even if it is at the expense of human values. Furthermore, we have seen “adventurism” that works closely with violence cause many of humanities despairs such as the; holocaust, slave trade,
In the worldly age are living people are filled with many margins; as he says Ian, who is impossible to read a book without margins, and the marginal behavior can be the most important kind. Each activity full of purpose that exists in the reality outside forest is like wasting time. The meaning of margin is where you can try out different ideas that might present a fear at the thought that he could not have the approval of others. Unfortunately, today there are more people that truncated its purposes by not having the approval of the public in general. By the above this option discard purposes by the approval of the world that surround us, we were a great banality-entering and would be in some way the daunting is a scenario of all.
Ultimately, the human heart seeks comfort and familiarity. The great unknown strips away this feeling of safety, leading to a vulnerability that draws the true nature of a person into the harshness of reality. Unfamiliar environments, newly met strangers, the imminent and all-too-unpredictable future--these things generally incite feelings of insecurity and anxiety; for some, panic accompanies the thought of not having control. Some avoid matters of fear altogether, opting for a life softened with intentional ignorance. It is the fatal tendency of mankind to manipulate their troubles into trivial tasks that can easily be ignored and eventually forgotten, or at the very least, left to the side.
The Holocaust. A horrific crime that will live forever in infamy. More so than December 7, 1941, for it was not one day, one month, or even one year. It was far worse. It was years of built up racist hate and blind confusion unleashed in a devastating manner.
This is a very significant and vital lesson the reader will learn as they read about Jeannette’s life. The author, Jeannette, never really comprehended this lesson until she grew up and matured. The lesson that Jeannette, the author, is trying to convey to the readers, is that there will always be a boundary between the two different forces, order and turbulence. But one force would not exist without the other, order and turbulence come hand in hand. Life is like a seesaw with two different forces sitting on one of the two ends, to balance out life so that it’s not too heavy on one side and too light on the other.
During the struggle of having a meaningful life, an individual must be able to define what is meaningful and how to obtain it. In the story excerpt “The Signature of All Things” by Elizabeth Gilbert, the protagonist, Alma, explores the part of her childhood where she breaks away from routine and makes the decision to make the most of the moment. To contrast, the poem “Atrophy” by Julia Copus explores the outcome of people who do not make the most of their lives and are stuck thinking of their wasted potential. An individual must routinely reconcile their past and present to obtain the power to make autonomous choices in order to create a meaningful life before the opportunity to grasp this power reaches its expiration date.
While Roth manages to show what Beauvoir discusses in “Myth and Reality”, that individuals have ambivalence which controls their choice of acting following the society roles, she just gives her point of view of how men treat women and base on women’s experience, however, she fails to show that women are, also, have ambivalence attitude. What is missing from her analysis is that Beauvoir when she discusses the ambivalence and the immanence and transcendence she shows that all individuals have these features, but Roth takes these ideas and discusses them based on men experience in the novel not women. In fact, Females, also, have ambivalence attitudes. For instance, when Lucy recognizes that there is something that is sucking her blood and she was able to describe it but she did not. Lucy just gives up by doubting what is going with her.
The way that such intricate, specific, and divergent books and life events relate is quite showing that the choices we make do affect others and ourselves, our passions define us in positive and negative ways, and being alone in an indifferent world makes us more aware in the end. Hardship and toil prove themselves to be worth it because for Marjane, Meursault, and myself, the results of our hard work with teach us more strength and independence than before. Existentialism exists more than we can see, and its philosophy promotes learning from
In these two scenes and in many other scenes and quotes throughout the book beauty is portrayed in a way that does not solely depend on outward appearance and is not defined by normative standards of class, sex, gender, sexuality, and femininity. Simone de Beauvoir’s thoughts in “The Second Sex” also agree with these statements by reiterating the fact that the “feminine woman” is a social construct and that society has controlled how people are supposed to think about normative beauty and women. Beauty cannot be defined. A woman cannot be defined. Beauty is an intersectional concept that includes all identities and all people regardless of outward appearance or what society says is beautiful.
In Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life, there are scenes that trick the audience into thinking that it will give them the movie’s view on the meaning of life. The film, however, never actually gives the audience a real, serious answer to the questions that relate to life’s meaning; by doing this, the people who created the film probably wanted the audience to make up their own views and answers to life’s meanings and purposes (a loosely defined meaning of existentialism). In existentialism, existentialists reject proposed systems that have a definitive answer to the questions involving the meaning and purpose of life; they freely choose standards of values on the human condition, which asks questions, like “Why am I here,” “What does it mean to be human,” or “How should I live my life?” According to Mitchell’s Roots of Wisdom, the idea of existentialism “emphasizes the uniqueness and freedom of the human person as an individual (what makes each life a unique, personal experience) as opposed to the essence of a human being (what makes all of us alive).”
Could you imagine watching your classmates or close friends die in front of your eyes? In the novel Nineteen Minutes by Jodi Picoult, Josie witnessed ten of her classmates, including her boyfriend unfortunately shot. Peter, a boy bullied his whole life, was the boy behind the gun aiming to kill the bullies. Part of the community wonders what motivated him to commit this crime and the rest of the community does not even want to her of his name. As you could envision, the whole community feels pity for the lifeless and injured, but what about Peter’s family who were not aware Peter was capable of such a horrific crime?
Jean Laffite was an American patriot, a famous pirate, and, a traitor to all. Laffite has spied for Britain, Spain, and America. Jean betrayed all but America. He was one of the best spies the united states had had at the time. He could hire other people to do his spying instead of risking his own life, but he did it all by himself.
Summary of Evidence: Simone de Beauvoir was born in Paris in 1908 to Georges de Beauvoir and Francoise Brasseur.1 Her father was born and raised in a rich family with that drew him to the extreme right on the political scale.1 He was a strong atheist, and pushed his proclivities on Beauvoir and her sister.1 Her mother on the other hand was a devout Catholic, and that along with her meek and submissive personality, something that manifests itself in the fact that she grew up in a time before first wave feminism, really polarized her and Beauvoir. Her father fed her intellectual side, providing her with many works of literature and encouraging her to read and write from an early age. Beauvoir was a deeply religious child as a result of her education and her mother 's training; however, at the age of 14 she had a crisis of faith and decided that there was definitely no God.1 This followed the end of WW
Western Literature serves as the foundation all literature. In Marie de France’s poetry, she incorporates the work of Homer, the Bible, and Ovid into her own poetry. Both Marie and Homer use detailed writing styles in order to portray their devotion to family and their Gods. Similarly, Marie borrows inspiration from the Bible in order to show her devotion to God as a savior. She also uses Ovid’s stories in order to depict morals throughout her fables.
Washing, ironing, sweeping, ferreting out the rolls of lint from under wardrobes—all this halting of decay is also the denial of life; for time simultaneously creates and destroys, and only its negative aspect concerns the housekeeper” (Beauvoir 380). "The Married Woman" is a chapter in Simone de Beauvoir’s book, The Second Sex, which demonstrates her negative thoughts about marriage and the overall treatment of a married woman. I agree with Beauvoir’s argument concerning the inequalities between spouses and the exaggeration of house work because of the time the book was written. In 1950, women’s roles were greatly changed because the men came back from war and took their jobs back.
Final Assignment of English Literature Reading BY YANG ZONGYOU, D01 “The False Gems”by the great writer Guy de Maupassant is a miracle that draws a delicate and precise image of France in the late 19th century. Written in an objective view, woven with sarcasm, this little piece of art reflects the truth of the society and humanity in its era without any obvious rhetoric, like a real old gem that shimmers constantly and gorgeously, leaving an ample space of ambiguity for readers to ponder over and over again. “The False Gems” seems to be objective, however, on the contrary, the plot of the story itself is a barrel of irony, in which the author 's opinion and emotion lies deeply — the genuine ones are found fake, while the false ones turn out to be real; knowing everything is not always good. Mrs. Lantin 's before-and-after contrary is ironic. At the very beginning of the story, everyone is convinced that Mrs. Lantin was a virtuous woman.