Single Payer Universal Healthcare System

Many people believe healthcare reform is a bad idea and that the government should stay away from healthcare. However, there are many other people who believe that it is a great thing that the government got involved, and created programs to register for mandatory health-care. In, “Healthcare Reform 101”, author Rick Panning discusses some of the main goals of the Affordable Healthcare Act, which are universality, financing, cost reduction, payment reform, quality and process improvement, prevention and wellness.

For us here in the United States, the focus will be on setting minimum standards across the nation without limiting individuals from buying higher coverage if that is their preference. In addition, individuals and families will be getting higher coverage, better access to treatment and quality health care. The beauty of this plan is that it works; many nations that use the single payer system with an explicit national health program allow individuals to purchase additional insurance or care using their own resources (Gruber, 2009). Unfortunately, the system in the United States does not quite work like that; many individuals are left in the lurch because there is no minimum standard that is acceptable across the board (Gruber, 2009). We have several extremes here in the States; one extreme is that millions of Americans have only subsidized health care coverage, another extreme is the

As different political sides have varying viewpoints on the topic of universal healthcare. While Democrat voters tend to lean in favor of the government providing some medical coverage, not even this side fully supports the introduction of universal healthcare. 40% of Democrats and Democratic leaners now favor a single national government program to provide health insurance, while Conservative voters seem to not be very fond of this idea. Only 18% are for a single national government-funded program. American voters seem to be happy with the already existing free system, but as I showcased, most of the population isn’t really in favor of the introduction of top-down health

The American health system has been controlled by private, all-for-profit companies who couldn’t care less about the health of a human, but are more worried about maximizing their dollars. If the Affordable Care Act is repealed, or “done away with”, tens of millions of Americans will be without adequate health insurance. This is exactly what Americans

Some detractors of a single payer health care system immediately point to the burdensome cost which would be placed on the average citizen in order to pay for such a system; however, A single payer health care system would be a manageable cost and would save most Americans money. One single payer critic made the claim that Single payer would be impossible because of the financial hit that it would require the U.S. to take, therefore making the very proposal of a single payer health system a politically toxic proposal that would lead to the souring of the electorate(McArdle n. pag). While Miss McArdle isn’t wrong in the fact that any single payer system would cost a considerable amount of money, she is mistaken in thinking that it would be

The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America.

While the arguments for universal healthcare contain a solid foundation in logic and emotion, they have few facts, the arguments against universal healthcare, however, are much more persuasive because they maintain a core basis in facts which outweigh the logic and emotion of the arguments supporting universal health care. The arguments for universal healthcare contain some facts; most have a stronger basis in logic and emotion, and some cases contain no facts. This is shown by highlighting the question of whether universal healthcare is a benefit or detriment to the economy, whether universal health care provides better quality health care or whether saving money is more important than having the freedom to choose your healthcare. Not only

The debate on how to effectively address the nation as a whole in terms of health care coverage has really heated up in recent years. With former President Obama working on legislation over his two terms starting in 2009 and producing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) otherwise known as “Obamacare”, the conversation seems to always to be stagnated along party lines between big government oversight vs little government oversight on the issue. With the implementation of the ACA, it seems that as of right now, the country is slowly moving towards an end where the government sees to it that in one way or another everyone is covered. Even with the recent Republican efforts, the ACA seems to be the United State’s early creation of a healthcare system which aims for all to be covered, one that is shared by many countries on the global scale. Even though the U.S. seems to become one of many countries where every man, woman, and child is covered, the way they will do it may not be like most and depend on the ACA.

The law that was intended to improve the status quo of health care has, in essence, caused a dangerous paradigm shift in health care costs. Fundamentally, the Affordable Care Act is a failed attempt to reduce health care costs in the United States. The Act was designed to increase affordability of health insurance for extremely low-income families; nevertheless, the Act exponentially increased health insurance costs for the majority of Americans. In America, majority rules-- why should health care be an

Single Payer health care is also much cheaper overall than the currently implemented or any previously implemented system in the United States. The inefficiencies and deprivation of human due to for-profit health care systems must come to an end, and a single payer system must be signed into law because many people have had and will have their lives abused and ruined by the current

All people should have quality, access, to affordable health care regardless of their age, sex, income, education, and ethnicity, color of skin, religion, sex orientation or identity. Health care in the United States is approximately $3 trillion industry, accounting for nearly 18 percent of the gross domestic product, is up from 14 percent in 2000. Over the last two decade, legislators have dealt with upward spiral, exacerbated by a growing number of uninsured and health care spending out of

The second editorial states that a universal healthcare system would be too expensive and decrease the quality of care the citizens would get. This author uses logic to support their argument. The author begins to talk about the Constitution to persuade people that the universal system is "unconstitutional. " Although this editorial does include facts and logic, a lot of it is based on strong emotion.

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

Health care is the maintenance and improvement of physical and mental health, especially through the provision of medical services. Don 't you believe that this is a right and dignity of all people should be able to have. Your body should be taken care of no matter the gender,race,health,or social economic back ground it is a right. Health care deserves to be able to be taken care of. I believe that universal health care for everyone is very important it will benefit people from the richest to the poorest.

The real debate is how can we accomplish the goal of universal healthcare in the most affordable and sustainable way. The United States is evaluated as a wealthy country, yet there are more penurious countries who provide health maintenance, paid through higher taxes. “In the United Kingdom and other European countries, payroll taxes average 37% - much higher than the 15.3% payroll taxes paid by the average US worker” (Gregory). With this data, the only reform would be to end the private health insurance companies of dominant health services, and incorporate a single payer system. Conversely, it is factual that taxes will rise, but the implementation of universal healthcare will better the health of American citizens.