Consider the type of a newly elected president vary: from noncorrupt to corrupt (continuum). In a natural setting, I assume that corruption ofa president reflects the type ofa president in an exact sameway. In other words, when there is no restraints, the more corrupt is a president, the more he or she seeks illegal private gains (See Figure 1). Henceforward, I use a concept CORRUPTION in this model to refer "a president’s BEHAVIOR deviates from the formal duties of a public role because of private-regarding (personal, close family, private clique) pecuniary or status gains; or violates rules against the exercise ofcertain types ofprivate-regarding influence (Nye 1967)". I assume that there is information asymmetry between a first-term president …show more content…
I define it as single-term presidency. Because a reelection incentive, which hinders a corrupt president from perpetrating corruption, does not exist, I expect that a degree ofcorruption by a first-term president will be higher under single-term presidency than under multi-term presidency, in which a first-term president can be reelected (See Figure 2).
My theoretical argument leads me to expect a negative relationship between single-term limit and first-term president’s corruption. I exploit post-testonlynonequivalentsamples design.
Since my level of observation is country, I cannot randomly assign groups to the treatment group and the control group. Also, I cannot conduct a pretest because presidential term-limit always exists. For level of observation, I confine samples to countries within South America in order to match legal-origin, which is also referred as a predictor of corruption (Treisman 2000). All South American countries share British Common law origin and have presidency. Also, I exclude countries in the specific year which are considered as dictatorship based on DemocracyDictatorship(DD) Index.6 Since my hypothesis deals with first-term presidents only, I exclude countries in which the president is under his or her second-term or
The Gilded age is an American History term meaning covered with glitter and gold and was applied to this period because of political corruption. President Grant was elected as president because of his war experience not his political background. He relied on his staff to help him make decisions. His staff was very corrupt and found themselves involved in many political scandals. Some of the issues that grant faced during his time in office was printing money, cheaper currency, and inflation.
Corruption of the Gilded Age Slavery has recently been abolished and there are lots of differences in America. We were divided and we still aren’t fully back together. Not everyone wanted to follow the president and his commands. The Gilded Age started, corrupt men were in charge and people couldn’t trust everyone that was in charge of them so sometimes there was no one to rely on. This shows why the gilded age was a very corrupt time for America.
Why do we see variation in first-term president 's corruption? Previous literature of regional comparative politics only provide limited accounts of presidential corruption. In this paper, I provide a theory that presidential term-limit matters with regard to first-term president 's corruption. I argue that when a president is elected at the first time, a president who is under single-term presidency---presidency under which a president cannot be reelected due to constitutional limit---is more likely to perpetrate corruption than under multi-term presidency---presidency under which a president can be reelected at least one more term. It is attributed to whether reelection incentive exists.
However, trust in a state elected senate eroded over time. Because of legislative deadlock, instances of corruption in the election of senators, and a slow move to populism, the public eventually began to resent the method in which senators were chosen. Although the constitution stated in Article I Section 3 that senators were to be chosen by state legislatures, it was unclear about how that selection should happen. In the late 19th century, states consistently failed to elect their senators because of this grey area. This was the result of political parties dividing state legislatures to the point where they could not agree on a singular candidate and between 1885 and 1900 alone the states of West Virginia, Louisiana, Montana, Washington and
Both China and Russia already protect dictators like Syria's Bashar al-Assad. This influence is based in military might not economic might. Militaries destroy, economies build. If these types of socialist or communist governments had gained greater relative influence in the past, we would have seen fewer democratic institutions like capitalism and more autocrats hanging on to power” (Mic.com).
Socratic Seminar Question Q: Why are Jerry Cruncher’s hands always covered in rust and who is the one that notices them? A: It is Jerry’s son who originally realizes that his hands are always covered in rust when he arrives home. (60)
(Wikipedia, 2014). Corruption in
Alberto Fujimori When one thinks of a corrupt political leader, many images and thoughts come through people’s minds. Often times people will even think of illuminati like organizations. However, there are those who also think of people that have power use hired arms to carry out dirty work. Alberto Fujimori is one such leader who had ties with a private force and possible ties into other governments. Fujimori was the president of Peru from 1990 to 2000, and was captured in 2007.
During the 1877 through 1920 the government's role wasn't really expanding, instead people were getting furious that the government weren't really doing anything to improve life so they started going on strikes, making unions, and bringing people of different cause together to try to force the government into being useful. However, this only led to political corruption, people saying they would do something to help the people and people would believe and put their trust into this "person" to only be blackmailed in the end. These "people" were called political bosses and they had their little organization or political machines and people would do them favors to gain jobs or etc. This growing "government" was a mixed bag for the American people,
Office holders cannot use their power to enrich themselves. Independent courts and commissions punish corruption, no matter who is
On the other hand, a dictator would be convincing/believable to his international community and win over his popularity. He would try to escape from being accused guilty of his actions. Even a
Who would have ever thought that a simple dictator could have so much in common with a pig from a book. It’s quite silly actually to think about it almost makes it seem like it 's a common thing for a dictator to make decisions like these. Though the things that Putin and Napoleon did are very weird both of them did it which makes it seem like it actually isn’t that weird especially for two dictators to do. No matter how common it is for dictators to pull stunts like the examples that have been given it is wrong nonetheless. As this essay is being written it is questioned, why is it that most dictators do terrible things and why isn’t their a dictator doing something good for a
In Stephen D. Krasner’s, “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” he defines what regimes are in relation to international politics as well as ascertaining their significance. Krasner compares and contrasts multiple scholarly viewpoints to determine if regimes have a noteworthy impact on international relations. Furthermore, he discusses the different building blocks for which regime development is built on. Krasner defines regimes as “sets of implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules and decision-making procedures around which actors’ expectations converge in a given area of international relations.”
1. Describe four ways through which dictators may attain political power (4 Marks) • In hard times, many people are often willing to go along with and support terrible things that would be unthinkable in good times thus creating suitable grounds for dictators to establish power • Aspiring dictators try to get power by attempting to destroy opponents. • Political crisis is caused by bad economic policies and foreign policies which enables a dictator to get power in pretense of resolving the crisis. • To establish a dictatorships the political system must lack a separation of powers and checks & balances. separation of power make it difficult for one branch of government to dominate the others.
TUNRADA W. 5504641993 Democracy and Corruption Does democracy produces or reduces corruption and how The question whether democracy produces or reduces corruption has been raised in the past decade observing the mixed evidences occurred across the world. Some democratic states tend to successfully overcome the problem of corruption, some in contrary faces with the more dramatic trouble than before. In the some unsuccessful, discourses were made blaming democracy as a tool for greedy agencies to take advantage from the people of the country.