Sinthasomphone vs Milwaukee U.S. 785 F. Supp 1343 (1992)
Facts: A child (Sinthasomphome) was returned to the custody of his assailant by police officers after being found naked and beaten on the streets after his escape. The child was later killed by this assailant. Parents of the child filed a civil rights action against the police officers and the city of Milwaukee for discrimination and failure to provide equal protection for their son. Survivors of other victims of his assailant also filed civil rights actions. District Court on motions to dismiss held; complainant’s parents held liability of officers and city of the boys return to his assailant: motion granted.
Main issue: Did the officers discriminate against the boy because he
-Summary Timothy Mitchell, father of 5 and a residence of Sault Ste Marie who is trying suing the Sault Ste. Marie Police Services Board. His claim is that during an arrest one of the officers, Keating who was detaining him had used unnecessary force. Mitchell had been struck by Keating near his left upper abdomen. During his hims time at the police station Mitchell claimed that Keating said “abuse, provocative and demeaning comments” and that Keating also pushed him from behind while sitting on a bench in a cell and as he left Keating he gave a “rude and abusive gesture to Mitchell”.
Case 442 U.S. 707 Fare v. Michael C. February 27, 1979 through June 20, 1979. This case involves Michael C., a sixteen year old juvenile, brought to the police station in California by Van Nuys police on a murder investigation. The juvenile was read his Miranda prophylactic protection rights before being questioned; he requested to speak to his probation officer but was denied. Michael agreed to speak with the officers and also waived his rights to counsel. While doing this, he brought forward incriminating statements against him that in return, the juvenile landed himself in court on a murder trial.
Because of this, the defendant argued that the government’s use of demonstrative evidence was prejudicial and that his conviction violated his rights under the Equal Protection Clause because if he wasn’t “Indian”, he would have been subjected to a minor and less harsh of a penalty under
State v. Dedge Article Critique Introduction On December 8, 1981 Wilton Dedge was working in his shop in Florida where he repairs transmissions. A 17 year old girl Jane Smith that stays in Florida about 50 miles from where Dedge works, was rapped two times and was cut by a razor 65 times. The description that the girl gave law enforcement was a tall white male standing about six and a half foot tall and weighing around 200 pounds. Dedge was seen at the gas station twice buy the girls sister where she called police.
Daniel Pelka a four year old boy murdered at the hands of his mother, Magdelena Luczak and his stepfather Mariusz Krezolek. Daniel suffered a severe head injury. Previously, before Daniel’s death, teachers observed Daniel’s behavior while eating. He constantly stole food from the other children lunchboxes.
This is a criminal case, in which the Supreme Court ruled that there was no probable cause to arrest Hayes. Hayes did not give consent to be taken to the police station and be detained plus fingerprint. Therefore, Hayed Fourth Amendment rights were violated and the conviction was overturned. Fact of the case: In the 1980’s there was a series of rape and burglary that happened in Punta Gorda Florida.
The plaintiffs in the case, Brandon’s parents, were suing based on the school failing to handle harassment at the school. More claims of wrongful death because of negligence and discrimination against Brandon’s disabilities were a part of the case, as well as suing parents for harassment and emotional distress. The Myers had claimed that the staff members were fostering a system where bullying was being able to thrive in the school and have no consequence, which still seemed to be the case when the life threatening notes were given to the school and no direct action was being taken for the victim. This also includes how the district officials, along with the employees, had kept the evidence and destroyed it to essentially keep the school protected. In March of 2010, the plaintiff’s Rehabilitation Act claim was dismissed in favor of the defendants, but kept all other respects in the case.
On 10/26/15 Ms. Calhoun visited Deven at the detention center where he’s being detained. The reporter stated when interviewing the child, she witnessed his right eye was swollen with a dark mark under it. According to the reporter, Deven wrote a detailed statement of grievance that gives a detail account of an altercation between him and Officer Kennedy on 10/23/15. In the detailed statement, Deven described the incident as follow: Deven states he asked Officer Kennedy if he could go to his room and was told to have a seat. Officer Cole gave Deven permission to go to his cell and as he waited at his cell door for it to be opened, Officer Kennedy told the child to have a seat.
1. Name of the Case: Estate of Sinthasomphone v. City of Milwaukee, 838 F. Supp. 1320, 1993. 2. Facts: On May 27, 1990, two women contacted the Milwaukee Police Department and reported an injured, naked young man lying on the street. The young man turned out to be Sinthasomphone, a 14 year old Laotian boy who had just escaped from the apartment of Jeffrey Dahmer.
Introduction: Preservation of Family In South Carolina, Family Preservation is of the highest importance when dealing with cases involving children. Title 63 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina is the South Carolina Children’s Code dedicated to the protection and advocacy of children. S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-10 (1976) states that “Any intervention by the State into family life on behalf of children must be guided by law, by strong philosophical underpinnings, and by sound professional standards for practice.” (S.C. Code Ann.
State of Georgia V. Marcus Dwayne Dixon (2003) Marcus Dixon was a highly recruited high school football player. His life suddenly took a tragic turn when he was falsely convicted of raping a 15 year old girl. The elements around his false conviction could have been avoided with some reform to the criminal justice courts system. Dixon initially had many charges against him but were narrowed down to statutory rape and aggravated child molestation. There was much racial disparity surrounding the jury on Dixon’s case, in that the county that Dixon committed his “crime” was a predominantly white population.
The problem arose when the parents were dissatisfied with the due process hearing;
Colin Newmark was diagnosed with cancer. The cancer was life threatening. His parents were Christian Scientists and refused to consent for chemotherapy for Colin. Their refusal was protected under State Law as it exempted parents from the neglect and abuse statutes if the refusal was supported by medical reasons. The plaintiff, Child Protective Services petitioned to continue treatment for Colin.
Both of the case involves Religion. Based on the R v. Tutton case, even though the accused was following their religion, it does not help the fact that in the end they still committed murder. In this case, although the father was following his own religion, it still does not help the fact that he still physically beaten the child with a
It was supposed to run through a 5-day contested hearing, which to the surprise of all parties, Magistrate Zelmk propelled the case to a final conciliation. This was in favor of the SRL as she was waiting for her legal aid to be approved and running a contested hearing without representation would have been extremely detrimental. This supports the fact that "Self-representation is almost inevitably associated with parties who have poor knowledge of the substantive and procedural law. In disputes involving children, where the parties must