Sir V. Naipaul Analysis

742 Words3 Pages
Do something that compels someone to write about you, or write something yourself. Well, Sir V S Naipaul qualifies both the genres. This man of influential words and simple living had his ancestral roots in the indentured laborers. V S Naipaul, who was born in 1932 in Trinidad is recognized widely as a downbeat writer. Highly skeptical of earning glory, this man went through every kind of trauma and hardship a human can imagine. But it wasn’t all darkness that loomed. Light was the round the corner when he received an Oxford Scholarship. His transition into a writer can be very well attributed to his journalist father. His writings surely give a sneak peek into the kind of life he has led.
Regardless of confines, Naipaul was gradually exploring culture and history. His discovery of himself and his identity didn’t come so easy. Meandering all through India and Africa, Naipaul learnt that a man is not actually what he becomes by birth. There is always another tangent to a situation. How the people behave with each other and in what
…show more content…
He had brought variation in his writings ranging from the Booker Prize Winner ‘In a Free State (1971)’, to ‘Guerillas (1975)’ to ‘A Bend in the River (1979)’. Half a Lie (2001) is one novel that earned him great respect and laurels. This book is reasoned to have brought him the Nobel Prize. But can you really afford to miss A House for Mr. Biswas (1961)? It is best not to. This widely acclaimed novel has found its way into 100 Best English Language Novels of the 20th Century at number 74 and the Time Magazine also. Saga of a simple Trinidadian, this book attempts to magnify the challenges in a postcolonial phase. Some segments being inspired by Naipaul’s father’s life, the novel is simply bang on enshrining Naipaul’s name
Open Document