Joseph Fletcher Situation Ethical Analysis

In John 13, Jesus teaches his various ways of love. From the start of washing His disciple’s feet, to the end telling His disciples to love one another. His teaching of equality in verse sixteen explains that one person may not be greater than the other regardless of title, proves that love should remain as love. One person cannot love or be blessed more than the other, for that brings envy and superiority and that is where love is lost. Jesus teaches us His way of love through the love of one another so that we show that we are His.

Conversely, Robert M. Stewart in “Meaningful Sex and Moral Respect” argues Elliston’s thesis that “promiscuity is a good thing for some people some of the time” (Elliston. 148) by claiming that they are only satisfying their lower-level pursuit of physical pleasure and are unbeknownst to the higher quality meaningful sex which they are capable of achieving. Stewart defines this lower-level pursuit of sexuality as “junk sex” and claims that pursuing it devalues the intellect and spirit of a person (Stewart. 143). Instead he argues that people should seek to engage in meaningful sex. According to Stewart, meaningful sex is related to higher, deeper, and more profound values such as love whereas “junk sex” can be an experience worth having but

With God at the basis of this ethical theory it is more often, than not, that people who are religious believe in this theory more than those who are not. This is because people who do not believe in God or the

The idea behind Kantian Ethics is that doing the right thing is not about the consequences of our actions but rather the principle motivating the action. Actions must be performed out of duty, that is, it is done solely because we have an obligation to perform such action out of respect for the moral law. As explained by Immanuel Kant, “the moral worth of an action done out of duty has its moral worth” (105). Kant argues that to act morally, then, is to “act only on the maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” (108). Utilitarianism, developed by John Stuart Mill, is one of the most commonly used approaches in making moral decisions.

Then I will present a major challenge for Mill’s view - Nozick’s ultimate pleasure concept- and why it fails to defeat Mill’s hedonistic utilitarianism. As stated in the introduction, utilitarianism is the ethical

There is no positive outcome for individuals who only focused on their personal welfare. For Christians, a meaningful life is obtained through God’s grace and He solely controls the outcome of an individual’s life. His fury reigns intensely on individuals attempting to regulate their own destiny. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, the star-crossed lovers suffered dire consequences from humanism. The Capulet and Montague feud was not the source of Romeo and Juliet’s circumstance, but their narcissistic projection.

In general, on a popular argument for ethical relativism would be the untenability of objectivism. It is a persuasive justification for moral relativism because it is the best alternative following the failure of objectivism. The fact that moral objectivists themselves are uncertain, incongruent and unsettled on a standard moral system is the primary catalyst encouraging moral skepticism (IEP, Argument for Moral Relativism). Cultural relativism outlines that “an action is morally right, relative to a culture, just because it is right according to the moral code which is generally accepted in that culture.” Conversely, if “an action is morally wrong, relative to a culture, just because it is wrong according to the moral code which is generally accepted in that culture.”

Believe that God loves you as you cannot conceive; that He loves you with your sin, in your sin. It has been said of old that over one

This method is supportive of Descartes’s will to emphasis on doubt and question anything that can be doubted. Thus, he demonstrates the presence of God through a chain of consequences ‘Causal proof’. Because of the law of conservation of matter, the cause must equal the effect, if we have an idea of God than this idea is the effect and God is the cause (Gaarder, 2003). Therefore, the idea we have of God is an innate idea that we did not produce ourselves. Accordingly, he expresses that as a result of his innate thoughts of God, it only makes sense that it be God who "is the reason for this thought".

Kant’s moral philosophy stands on the notion of good will, an intrinsic good which is perceived to be so without qualification, independent of any external factors. Thus, he dismisses other values that could be taken as good in themselves, such as happiness, honesty, courage, trust etc. as they have worth only under specific conditions, whereas in others they could be transposed into bad acts. For example, trust is necessary for one to be able to manipulate others, one must have courage to be able to

Is Ender Wiggin a Murderer? Have you ever done something but you weren’t sure whether it was ethical or not? Or have you ever wondered why some things are ethical and some things are not in society? Who decides what is ethical or not? In the book Ender’s Game, the author Orson Scott Card uses Ender as a metaphor for the choices that people have to make every day.