Situational Crime Theory Essay

Deviant Place Theory is the view that victimization is primarily a function of where people live. The thief decided to go to a place where it was easy for him to break in. For example the house did not have wires or any metal to keep out people out of the owner’s property. It looked like if the thief had been observing the house and thru where he was going to go in. Neighborhood crime levels may be more significant than individual characteristics of lifestyle for determining the chances of victimization the places where they live are more poor and essay to break

Broken windows theory states that unchecked social disorder leads to major crime. Police are here to help keep social disorder in check. This includes disorderly people such as: drug dealers, prostitutes, thieves, etc. A weakness of this crime is that it does not account for the background of people. The Broken Windows theory ignores social and cultural aspects like poverty and only looks at the effects of the “broken window”.

This term means that an criminal will evaluate themselves on their skills, motives, needs, wants, what they are scared of and thoughts of is this worth it before they decide if they want to try to commit the crime or not. Situational crime prevention- This term means that there are crime prevention methods to try to reduce the likelihood of a crime being committed there. For example would be burglaries and how they would increase the lighting of the homes and also adding security alarms to the homes to prevent or reduce the likelihood of being burglarized. Displacement-

The two most popular sociological theories that offer an explanation as to why certain types of people are more likely to be victims of crimes is the Lifestyle Theory (the belief that certain leisure-time and other activities increase the chances of becoming a crime victim) and the Routine Activities Theory (the view that an individual’s daily activities can affect his or her chances of becoming a crime victim). Although these theories differ slightly in specific application, both theories generally assert that “the habits, lifestyles, and behavioral patterns of potential crime victims enhance their contact with offenders and thereby increase the chances that crimes will occur” (Miethe and Meier 1990:244). Research is supportive of either theory as an explanation of certain people being more likely to be victim

11.) The purpose of Like-Haislip and Miofsky’s (2011) study was to explore the patterns of violent victimization risks among race, ethnicity, and gender. Also to see whether routine activities and neighborhood conditions influence the risk for victimization. 12.) Routine activities theory is were behavior and people in time and space influence when a crime will occur and where.

There are 5 named theories in the book. Each theory has its own reason why a specific person committed a crime. 1st there is the classical and neoclassical theories. This theory states that the crime was caused by one 's own will to do so. Next theory is the biological and trait theories.

One major crime theory is the containment theory. Walter Reckless was the main author of the Containment theory. He believed that people had restraint and assumed that all humans are subject to inducements to crime. The theory is a type of restraint theory which assumes that humans are subject to inducements to crime (Schmalleger, 2015, p.92). Although some people can defy the “pushes” toward criminal acts, others cannot.

Lifestyle theory and activities theory are largely used to understand why people are victimized. Simply put, lifestyle theory explains that certain people are more likely to be a victim of crime based on their lifestyles. Putting oneself in certain situations such as walking alone at night or being drunk in the streets would be a clear example of lifestyle theory, because that person is putting himself/herself at risk. Routine activities theory argues that people who engage in routine activities are at a bigger risk for victimization. Along with these theories are more personal explanations

Situational crime prevention [SCP] is a comparatively new idea that services a precautionary approach by concentrating on methods to decrease the chances for crime. SCP attentions on the criminal situation and is dissimilar from most criminology as it begins with an inspection of the conditions that permit particular categories of crime. By ahead an understanding of these conditions, mechanisms are then presented to alteration the relevant situations with the goal of dropping the chances for specific crimes. Thus, SCP focuses on crime prevention rather than the punishment or else discovery of criminals and its purpose is to make criminal actions less appealing to offenders. SCP attentions on opportunity-reducing processes that: Are aimed at

The main idea is that there are areas within a population from which deviance arises, and crime rates are stable despite ethnic changes within the neighborhood. The theory has come under some fire by critics because of its reliance on locations, lack of focus on social structures, and locus of application. I agree with the theory as it is similar to the Criminal Justice “Broken Window Theory “.The “broken windows” theory voiced by George Kelling and James Q. Wilson in 1982 on an article in the Atlantic Monthly, which showed a link between urban disorders and crime that involves a process of deterioration in those areas that creates an atmosphere that make people think a place is not being “taken care of” and would most likely not care about the determination and a great environment for criminal because nobody cares about the “broken glass”. If the neighborhood does not seem to care about their environment, it would be seen as a norm to become

This theory is known as Rational Choice Theory, a modern version of Classical School Thinking (Boyd, 2015). Situational Crime Prevention seeks to alter the costs and benefits involved in crime choices, it is also known as a very effective way of preventing crime and most cost-effective. Situational Crime Prevention also factors in the importance of the environment, product and system. (Boyd, 2015) There are five broad categories in Crime Prevention for Situational Crime Prevention: increase the effort needed to commit a crime by making the target harder to get to, increase the risks

A number of theories have been advanced to explain criminal victimization. Lifestyle theory, for example, argues that certain lifestyles increases one's exposure to criminal offenses and increases the risk of victimization, while other lifestyles might reduce risk. For example, increased risk would be likely if a person is single, associating with other young men (who are at greater risk for criminal activity), living in urban areas, and going to public places late at night. Reduced risk would be associated with staying home at night, living in a rural area, being married and staying at home, and earning more money.

When looking at the offence of burglary and the ways in which to prevent it, it must first be understood how the victims are chosen and what the offenders look for. Many studies have been done focusing on a burglar’s assessment of the targets, in particular its accessibility, whether a house has high fences or hedges surrounding it, and occupancy, whether there is any indicator that a person is at home. This is done by relying on learned responses to visual cues, including ones’ signifying wealth and security. An offender will also look at the potential rewards that could be gained from burgling a house and whether there is something worth stealing that overrides the risk of getting caught. As stated by Brown and Bentley,

Society within the boundary unites against those outside the boundary, therefore strengthening the solidarity of the society. According to sociologists, crime is a function of inequality. The more inequality seen in a society, the more crime

Crime offers a way in which poor people can obtain material goods they cannot attain through legal means. Often, threat or force helps them acquire even more goods, encouraging them to commit more violent acts such as robbery and rape. Thus, poverty increases crime