Skyler Reed Argumentative Essay

Closing Statement The reason we’re here is because of a drone and a medical report. “Skyler Reed was injured” is the only concrete fact that all accounts have stated. Everything else is conflicting, and so the defense has come here to prove that it was not the drone that caused Skyler to fall, but an unrelated series of unfortunate events.

We found out that the incident took place at the Music in the Sand concert, and at the time Skyler had ignored the multiple warnings of danger and decided to stand on a trash can at the concert. (The warnings shall now be presented in a clear, indisputable fashion.)

First, the most clear warning was the assurance Skyler had to stand on the trash can. Though the plaintiff may use this as evidence, I would like to refer back to the cross examination of Skyler Reed. The other individual on the trash can was a little girl. And that little girl was carefully watched by her parents. Children do not have the most sensible minds, even if

First, an external wound. Unlike soft objects, the drone is made of hard plastic and should have left an external mark. This could be something as small as a bump or bruise or as severe as an open laceration on the forehead. Or second, an internal injury would be located in the occipital lobe found in the rear region of the brain. The location of the occipital lobe can be seen in the diagram located in the TBI article (marked as Exhibit #8). However, neither of these were present. Instead, we find an open wound on the scalp at the back of Skyler’s head. This is consistent with an impact to a hard surface like the concrete walkway where Skyler was found lying. Next, from that initial back of the head impact, the brain is thrown forward into the skull, causing the contusions to develop at the frontal lobe. Contusions are purely internal injuries, which would explain why there were no external indicators on Skyler’s