ipl-logo

Slavery Argumentative Analysis

675 Words3 Pages

Although the North and South had united for a common goal during the Mexican War, territories acquired as a result of the war caused tensions to rise again as the debate arose over whether these territories would permit or prohibit slavery (Schultz, 2013). Additionally, as the westward expansion continued, it was difficult for the two political parties to retain the support necessary from particular regions to uphold their principles on the slavery issue (Schultz, 2013). Supporters of the Democratic Party favored defending the rights of all men; however, southern Democrats strongly supported slavery in the new territories, thusly, in direct conflict with the rights of white as well as black men (Schultz, 2013). Arguments from the Northerners …show more content…

Components of this bill were: (1) Admitting California as a free state to the Union; (2) Dividing the other territory won in the Mexican-American War into two territories that would become Utah and New Mexico, where slavery would be allowed until they became states and then their state governments would decide the issue; (3) Banning of slave auctions in Washington, D.C.; (4) Compensating Texas $ 10,000, however it was not allowed to carry slavery into the area of New Mexico; and (5) Create Fugitive Slave Laws that would punish northerners for aiding slaves to escape from the South (Schultz, 2013). As President Zachary Taylor died in office and was succeeded by Millard Fillmore who was a supporter of the compromise, the chances of passage improved (Schultz, 2013). With elements to appeal to both northerners and southerners, and in addition, sparking much controversy in Congress, passage required dividing the bill into parts and voting on each separately (History.com Staff, 2009). Although there was controversy over the compromise, it gave Congress several years of success in regards to slavery issues and the north and south disputes over it (History.com Staff,

Show More
Related

  • Political Changes During The Presidency Of Millard Fillimore

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many laws were passed and politics changed during Millard Fillmore’s presidency, but the Compromise of 1850 was the most significant. Millard Fillmore passed the Compromise of 1850 in order to assist America gradually retract from slavery, but the compromise was indeed mutualistic for both the slave owners and those opposed to slavery. The compromise added California, Texas, and New Mexico as states, but in return slavery was not permitted in these new states. Slave trade was also abolished in the District of Columbia under this law, but on the contrary, the Fugitive Slave Act was passed under this compromise. This act placed federal officers with

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Sectional Compromises Between 1820 And 1850

    948 Words  | 4 Pages

    A compromise cannot be reached regarding the case of slavery if Congress cannot make any laws in reference to slavery. This then caused a compromise in 1860 to be quite difficult to come about compared to the compromises that had been created in the

    Read More

  • Bleeding Kansas Dbq

    297 Words  | 2 Pages

    One key issue between the two parts of the country was whether or not slavery would expand westward to any newly acquired territories. This had been an issue for a long time and ultimately after failing to reach a compromise the country fell back on popular sovereignty or letting people in the new territories decide whether or not they wanted slaver. This however provided no solution as can be seen in the incident “Bleeding Kansas”. This was a series of violent acts in Kansas between those who were for and against slaver.

    Read More

  • Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

    138 Words  | 1 Pages

    Senator Douglas divided the plan into parts that can be voted on individually (Textbook, 451). These compromises did not feature banning slavery. Ultimately, the Civil

    Read More

  • Reasons Why The Union Couldn T Coexist In The Election Of 1860

    766 Words  | 4 Pages

    This compromise written by Henry Clay, it brought together the states that were divided into a union. It was more of a series of laws than a compromise. Their were five bills that made up the compromise: first California entered the Union as a free state, secondly New Mexico and Utah could decide wether or not slavery was permitted within borders, thirdly the republic of Texas gave up some of land and paid 10 million dollars of debt to Mexico, fourthly slave trade became illegal in the district of colombia and lastly, fugitive slave act was created a law that required all northerners to leave all escaped and free slaves alone in the South. To wrap it all out, this compromise made an impact because it made citizens part of slavery by making them capture the runaway slaves. If a citizen was caught hiding a slave he or she were sent to jail.

    Read More

  • How Did Clay Win The Civil War

    307 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even with this great compromise, the North and the South still found it difficult to agree with another and were beginning to spiral out of control. Almost on the verge of war Clay decided he needed a strategy in order to beat the North and South at their own game. Instead of making his comprises one big bill, he split it into five groups, therefore making it impossible for both sides to turn it down completely. They would be able to vote against the five bills they liked and disliked without voting completely against one big bill. In August and September, the Senate and the House voted to approve all of Clay’s five bills; which became the Comprise of 1850.

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • Compromises In 1860

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    Geographically the United States was divided with the North being against slavery and the South supporting slavery. This division in the states had a great affect on the decision making in congress

    Read More

  • Successes And Failures Of Reconstruction

    452 Words  | 2 Pages

    Once that was completed that new state government could send members to Congress so that they could have a say in the federal government as well. Of Course, many people found this way of reuniting the North and the South to simple and wanted there to be stricter rules in order for the South to join the Union. That stricter plan was later created and names the Wade-Davis Bill. The

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.

    Read More

  • Hypocrisy Of Slavery Analysis

    1657 Words  | 7 Pages

    “The Hypocrisy of American Slavery: Slavery at its best” Frederick Douglass an activist for anti racism and also an abolitionist’s speech “The Hypocrisy of Slavery” was given on the occasion of celebrating the independence day. Here, in this speech he actually brought out some questions like why we should celebrate Independence Day while almost four million people were kept chained as a slave. He actually mocked the fact of the people of America’s double standards which is that they are singing out the song of liberty, on the other hand holding the chain of slavery. Frederick Douglass, a former American-African slave who managed to escape from his slavery and later on became an abolitionist gave this speech on Fourth of July,

    Read More

  • Causes Of The Compromise Of 1850

    1851 Words  | 8 Pages

    With all that in mind, the Compromise of 1850 eased the tensions between the North and the South, but only for a short while. Four years after the compromise, Stephen A. Douglas, a senator from Illinois, introduced a bill that dealt would allow residents in Kansas and Nebraska to decide on the state of slavery in their states. This new law would also nullify the Missouri Compromise Line that had been in effect for decades because Kansas and Nebraska were on different sides of it. The removal of the Missouri Compromise Line was a major issue for the Democratic Party. Democrats from the North preferred the idea of popular sovereignty, while those from the South preferred outright slavery.

    Read More

  • Thesis Statement On Slavery

    771 Words  | 4 Pages

    • A. Hook: Slavery is the most horrible thing to do to a child. Slavery is people making kids do what they want them to do no matter what. Slavery started when they brought the first american colony to the united states. Slavery was practiced through the american colonies in the 17th and 18th centuries. Slavery means to get bullied and bossed around about somebody.

    Read More

  • Why Did The American Civil War Was Inevitable?

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, these differences show that the North and South were actually two distinct countries held together by one constitution. The North felt that decisions regarding slavery and its legality were entrenched in the central government while the South felt that such decision belonged to the individual states. In the times preceding the war, both sides could not reach a compromise. Bonner mentions, “Because secession and war were permitted to come, warned Russel, "We are not entitled to lay the flattering unction to our souls that the Civil War was an inevitable conflict (Bonner, 195).” Hence, these differences could only be addressed through war.

    Read More

  • Slavery Argumentative Essay

    1680 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the minds of many Southerners, without slavery, the South and America as a whole, wouldn’t continue to be a growing economic powerhouse, and would lose its culture as a nation where White Christian, males, ruled society. For many, there was no South, no America, without slavery. History has shown time and time again that power corrupts. To hold onto their power, slave owners made sure their slaves were kept uneducated.

    Read More

More about Slavery Argumentative Analysis

Open Document