After the plantation revolution in the 1600s, slavery became a horrible institution driven by the mass production of goods by white slave-owners who were looking to succeed economically. Slaves were treated as disposable commodities and lived hard lives under the brutal hand of their slave-owners. By the 1800s, slavery was natural and very common in the south, and was justified because African Americans were seen as an inferior race who were uneducated and incapable of engaging in society. Since slaves had no political power, especially in the south, they could not fight for their freedom; most were uneducated, so they could not write their accounts down; and even when slaves successfully escaped north, they had a hard time communicating with …show more content…
Douglass who grew up under the hand of many different Christian overseers and masters, shared that, “religious slaveholders [were] the worst.” When Douglass was abiding with Mr. Thomas Auld (Mr. Auld’s brother), He described him as a man, “incapable of managing his slaves either by force, fear, or fraud,” until his religious conversion. Mr. Thomas Auld was converted at a Methodist camp-meeting, and Douglass expressed, “I indulged in a faint hope that his conversion would lead him to emancipate his slaves, and that, if it did not do this, it would, at any rate, make him more kind and humane.” Douglass was let down in both respects, and he said, “If it had any effect on his character, it made him more cruel and hateful in all his ways… after his conversion, he found religious sanction and support for his slaveholding cruelty.” One of his master’s justifications involved reciting religious passages and quotes from the Bible while whipping his slaves. Mr. Thomas Auld, however, was not the worst religious slaveholder, in fact Douglass shares stories of Reverend Hopkins and Reverend Weeden only to prove the crudeness of Christian slaveholders. Douglass then goes on to tell of how some fellow slaves and himself began to familiarize themselves with Christianity, and how it angered their slaveholders, who, “would much rather see them …show more content…
Douglass states, “I had very strangely supposed, while in slavery, that few of the comforts, and scarcely any of the luxuries, of life were enjoyed at the north, compared with what were enjoyed by the slaveholders of the south. I probably came to this conclusion from the fact that northern people owned no slaves.” Douglass was brainwashed with this idea since he grew up in a society where you labor for free, with all the reward returning to the slaveholders. His idea of, “in the absence of slaves, there could be no wealth,” was soon debunked by the cleanliness, beauty, and strongest proofs of wealth that he found in the north. The work proved better and more humane too, “There were no loud [sad] songs heard from those engaged in loading and unloading ships. I heard no deep oaths or horrid curses on the laborer. I saw no whipping of men; but all seemed to go smoothly on. Every man appeared to understand his work, and went at it with a sober, yet cheerful earnestness, which betoken… a sense of his own dignity as a man.” Douglass even goes on to profess that what he saw in the south, such as: dilapidated house, poverty stricken inmates, half-naked children, and barefooted women, did not appear in the north, providing the idea that the south was less wealthy because of the condition of the slaves that lived there. Douglass
Throughout the “Narrative of Fredrick Douglass”, Douglass develops an image between true and false Christianity. Douglass elaborates his point in the opening appendix, calling the former “the Christianity of Christ” and the latter “the Christianity of this land.” Douglass describes the ordeal that slaveholders’ Christianity is not a given evidence of natural goodness, but an artificial state of self-righteous brutality. To tackle this distinction, Douglass states a basic contradiction between the charitable, peaceful beliefs of Christianity and the violence from the immoral actions of slaveholders. The character that is described as a good example for this theme is Thomas Auld.
Moreover, Douglass elaborates on the use of religion to justify such deeds, and he uses the character of Thomas Auld as an example for this. Thomas Auld is a man who comes into the possession of slaves through marriage, and such authority turns him into an inhumane person. He uses religion as a justification for his wrongdoings to those slaves, and usually recites religious verses while whipping them. This emphasizes the idea that slavery turns slaveholders into hypocrites; they are willing to go as far as use religion in their favor to support their
The clanking of fetters and the rattling of chains in the prison, and the pious psalm and solemn prayer in the church, may be heard at the same time” (Douglass, 1275) He describing how similar they were although dressed differently. Douglass also informs the reader that the more religious the master, the worse the slaves were treated: “I am filled with unutterable loathing when I contemplate the religious pomp and show together with the horrible inconsistencies, which everywhere surrounds me. We have men-stealers for ministers, women-whippers for missionaries, and cradle-plunders for church members.”. (Douglass, 1225)
Douglass refers to the Bible, to demonstrate the negative influence this sacred text had toward slavery. Alluding to the Bible, Douglass has the ability to explain how slave owners justified slavery. For example, he states that “...God cursed Ham, and therefore American slavery is right. If the lineal descendants of Ham are alone to be scripturally enslaved, it is certain that slavery at the south must soon become unscriptural...” (Page 4) as slave owners argument regarding from what is moral and immoral to justify their injustice towards other human beings.
Defenders of slavery argued that slavery was not bad for slaves, but Douglass argues that it is terrible. One way it is terrible for a slave is that they're taken from their parents. Douglass is not sure who his father is but he guesses it is the master. he is separated from his mother and he only saw her at night. Douglass says that his master tries to “blunt and destroy the natural affection of the mother for the child” (1.3).
During the times taking place in Douglass’s narrative, the majority of southerners were dedicated Christians. Ironically, those same people owned slaves. While many people would agree that owning another human being is morally wrong, slaveholders seemed to find it acceptable. Although some slaveholders were considered more or less cruel than others, the act of considering a fellow human being one’s property is cruel enough to be considered immoral, and goes against the teachings of the church. To many people, it is a mystery as to how people of faith could behave so horribly to another person.
Lastly, Douglass’ explains his thought on slavery and from what he says it becomes ironic. One of the ironies in the book that Douglass talks about is how religious slaves are more cruel than non-religious slaves. In chapter 9, Douglass’ master, Thomas Auld, became
As a people, we may assume that Douglass is against the people whom think that they know the Lord, but behind the curtain they have slaves, use women, and abuse children and adults. His friends in the movement of abolition were very strong Christians, who prayed and feared God, but he has many critics as slaveholders who claim to know God but surely they do not. Douglass never cared too much for people whom were both slaveholders and “Christians”. He not only dislikes the hypocrites, he says that the slaveholders are crueler when they are
People have their equal right, and should not be ranked depending on their skin color or gender. However, as “The American Story” states “The masters of these agrarian communities sought to ensure their personal safety and the profitability of their enterprises by using physical and psychological means to make slaves docile and obedient” (page 352), because of the greed of wealth and safety, some people discarded their basic humanity and discipline and made excuses to justify their cruelty, so the slavery became like a tumor growing in the human society rapidly. With physical and psychological abuse, this “tumor” tortured every struggling people from day to night. As the insight of a dark history, Frederick Douglass’s “Narrative of the Life
In Frederick Douglass’s book, he writes accounts of his time in slavery and beyond. Throughout the book, Douglass writes about not only the physical hardships slaves endured, but the mental and emotional hardships as well. In Chapter X, Douglass describes a battle he had with a temporary slave owner named Mr. Covey. After the fight concludes, Douglass writes, “This battle with Mr. Covey was the turning point in my career as a slave. It rekindled the few expiring embers of freedom, and revived within me a sense of my own manhood.
Douglass believes that this notion of hypocrisy contradicts virtues altogether, especially within slavery. Towards the middle of his narrative, Douglass encounters adversity with one of his slave owners, Mr. Auld. After attending a Methodist camp, Mr. Auld returns as a “religious man”, yet in reality, he is far from anything religious. Douglass depicts his return as “neither [making]ma[king] him [...] humane to his slaves, nor to emancipate them. If it had any effect on his character, it made him more cruel and hateful in all his ways" (45).
In Douglass’s youth, after having changed many hands of Colonel Lloyd’s heirs, he finally landed in the treacherous possession of the late colonel’s son-in-law, Master Thomas Auld. After living few months with him, Douglass understood Auld’s true colors of lacking proper slaveholding skills and authority, as well as every other “noble” element of character any human is expected with. Soon, Douglass narrates his master’s incorporation into a Methodist church where “he found religious sanction” for his crimes (47). The kind of “cover-up” religion provides to promote the dehumanizing effects of slavery is ultimately horrifying and revolting. The white supremacists not only cause harm on their slaves, but also themselves, by convincing themselves of following a religion that doesn’t promote violence, whilst the opposite is occurs.
In Douglass’s time, he distinguishes two types of religion: authentic Christianity and Southern Christianity. Douglass first defines authentic Christianity in the appendix of the book, proclaiming that it is as simple as “lov[ing] the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ” (81). A true Christian acts according to the will of God and practices good works for salvation. However, Southern Christianity is an altered form of these beliefs. While there are no distinct definitions within the Narrative, religious slaveowners shape the meaning of Southern Christianity through their actions.
In “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave” there are many ironic actions related to religion. Douglass does his best to give us personal accounts of events he witnessed. Douglass also gives the reader a better understanding of how slaves were treated and how many people backed up their actions with
Douglass hoped that the conversion would make him kinder, but it failed to do so; rather, it made him even more cruel and hateful. Before he converted, he “relied on his own depravity.” After, he’d found religious sanction and support. Once he became a Christian, Auld went to extremes. For example, he tied up a lame young woman, who he kept tied up for hours at a time; Auld would whip her before before breakfast, leave her there, and return after dinner to whip her again.