Agriculture production based on slave labor was inefficient but more efficient than farming families. Free white man’s work was never as productive as a slave field hand. The value of slaves weren’t so profitable unless the land that they were on was new and highly fertile. Slavery caused the economy of the South to deteriorate on the economic growth during the time before the Civil War. Slavery was never really an irrational type of system.
The better diet was in opposition to the meals they lacked during the voyage on slave ships and working in the fields. Economically wise, we cannot see any slave filling up their very own pockets with money other than the plantation owner or their own owners. During this period we start to see gender roles take place in the slave’s work duties. Men and Women worked in fields almost equally picking cotton and other grains in various parts of the south. Many even built roads to allow the transportation of goods to reach one place to the other.
Usually, the slaves who worked in urban areas had more autonomy than those who worked in rural areas. While the conditions of the slaves who worked in the sugar plantations of Southern Louisiana were the worst in the South, slaves who produced labor in the rice fields, even though their working conditions were particularly harsh, had more independence
The economic situation in the South was less advanced than in the North. The South was very dependent on waterways for trade exchange and less so on the railroad. They grew cotton almost exclusively, depending on the assistance of slaves to produce the crop. The North, on the other hand, grew more staple crops and used all means of transport for trade. The Market Revolution caused the differences to deepen, as the Southern plantation owners were reluctant to experience change.
In the early 1800s, the south—and most of the north, for that matter—used a subsistence economy, where crops and goods were made locally by families for themselves and their communities. Family farms were basically forced to use a subsistence economy, simply because the lack of fast transportation. If they attempted to ship their crops to other ports and towns where it was needed, the crops would rot well before they ever made it. In the south, cotton was made using slave labor, but the harvests weren’t as large as they could be. The process of harvesting was slow—as it was with many crops across the north and south—and the wield was decent.
In Africa, it led to a lower population which led to lower economic activity and poverty as millions of people were shipped out of their countries. They were put in these terrible conditions due to the Europeans obliging them to do all of their laborious work (The Atlantic Slave Trade). In America, it led to dramatically higher population and economic activity as the slave trade increased the labor force in mining, farming and different work on plantations. This supported the expansion of their population, which the Europeans believed was necessary to increase and expand their economy. (Forced Crossings) There was always a need for more slaves due to all of the work that the Europeans had.“Therefore, natural increase amount slaves were not enough even to maintain, let alone increase, the slave population and to keep up with the increasing demand for labor” (Forced Crossings).
(Slides, 12) Freedmen had to pick cotton even though it was the last thing they wanted to do. Sharecropping was when the freedmen lived with their masters, planted on their land, and gave them some crops in return for shelter, cloths, tools, and food. Freedmen often do not have enough knowledge to earn money any other way because when they just got out of slavery they did not have an education. Former slave masters would let freedmen stay on their land for half of the crops they made. Sharecropping was when the freedmen lived with their masters, planted on their land, and gave them some crops in return for shelter, cloths, tools, and food.
It enjoyed having a free labor system. It also relied on slave labor to maintain the growth of the farms and plantations. The north didn’t support slavery because they believed it was unfair the south didn’t have to pay for labor. The census of 1790 revealed how many more slaves were in the south than in the north. The south used to it to prove to the north that slavery would not disappear as quickly as believed or perceived.
Many groups and individuals were able to preserver and become outstanding members of society despite these attacks. The unfree slaves lives were still kept in check and gave little opportunity for escape from their farms or plantations and for those who escaped; they were either caught and beaten or faced death. Even if they were able to successfully escape they lived in a constant fear of being caught, which could lead to a return to their farm or being resold again. In the end, life was difficult for those free and unfree in society, the rules may have been adjusted, but never full changed to embrace the newer members to society and its classes; this eventually would set the tone and establish the groundwork for the growth of racism that would and has plagued this nation and others for many years. The Out of Ditch experience was for those who despite the conditions and challenges of the times were able to lift themselves out of the ditch of life that was lacking freedoms and be able to pursue life, as it should be equally for
As shown by Garrison Frazier, many freedmen saw freedom as the opportunity to live on the labours of their own land. In most cases, however, this never materialised, as neither the United States Government, nor the southern states gave any significant land reform. Although a few freedmen had obtained land with assistance from the Union army, or groups of soldiers had pooled resources to buy land, much of what was given to blacks and loyal whites (as in the Southern Homestead Act of 1866) was composed of poor soil, and few former slaves had the resources to survive until their crops came in. By the end of Reconstruction, barely any former slaves owned farms – without land reform, impediments to black landownership remained huge (Boyer & al,
When the New World was discover it depend on slavery to help finance the colonies and the industrial revolution. When the Slavery trade first started it open many jobs for the people in the colonies. They needed people to make the boats, the shackles, also the people that would go and get the slaves. In the south slavery played a big part in the economy, whether it was from working in the cotton plantations to slave trade. The plantation owners would pay the slaves a very low amount of money for the amount of work they did or not pay them at all, they would work for free and that way they would save a large amount of money.
In the upper South, where slaves living in urban communities were more common, this allowed slave owners to make a profit from their extra slaves. Industrialist ran into a problem because they didn 't want the burden of looking after their slave employees outside of the work they were hired for, and they often gave them allowances to pay for their own housing. This allowed slaves in the urban community to live in a diverse area that included blacks that were free, slaves and white people, some of whom might be against slavery (“Slavery in the Civil War Era,”
Because these slaves were owned for life, the owners typically did not have to pay “freedom dues” which added to their cost benefits. Discussion The Colonies in the New World was a place with a lot of land, but not enough people to cultivate it properly. To rectify this lack of labor, the practice of indentured servitude became a primary means to gain labor for the settler’s land on the newly settled continent. While initially, this form of employment proved beneficial to the settlers and to some extent to the servants themselves, the labor pool of willing servants began to shrink and the cost associated with them began to increase. Slaves became common and a more cost efficient option for labor
What economic problems did newly freed slaves face? The problems that the economic about the new freed slaves is that the slaves had no money or clothing the job opportunities were extremely limited but the slaves had no education and couldn’t read or write as a result of the slave codes a freed slave was in farming even they usually knew how to do the manual labor, not actual running of a farm. How successful was reconstruction in creating real economic freedom? Not much sharecropping and tenant farming economic slavery because it kept subservient to whites and at their whim. What types of jobs did freeman take?