Throughout the course of American History, one of the most inner conflicts held within this nation has been the conflict between sectionalism and slavery. Divided by the North and the South, the conflicts born by these two opposing sections were a result over the debate on slavery. Since the North was primarily made up of business and industry, the people had no need for the institution known as slavery. However, the South was simply an area in which the practice of slavery was used to make a profit for its agriculture based society. Slavery became a topic for debate, but not because it was just morally wrong for it was a conflict of personal gain.
Therefore, they continued to be poor farm workers who pretty much had to work for the rich landowners. This was not much different from how things had been during slavery. It is clear that the government did not care much of the morality of slavery more than as a political tactic to secure higher
If you did not survive the boat ride it really did matter to the merchants and to the people running the slave trade your life was worth nothing and your life was cheap in money so they just could go and get more slaves to take your spot. Some slaves on there way over would even commit suicide so they would not have to endure what was coming next. When you got to the land you would go directly to auctions were slaves would be bought and sold and then you were off to work. The work you may have done was either working as a domestic slave in which you would help run the household, cook, clean, take care of the children and basically do what you owner tells you to do. You may have worked in the fields on a farm or on a plantation where you would work in the beating hot sun especially in the
In the minds of many Southerners, without slavery, the South and America as a whole, wouldn’t continue to be a growing economic powerhouse, and would lose its culture as a nation where White Christian, males, ruled society. For many, there was no South, no America, without slavery. History has shown time and time again that power corrupts. To hold onto their power, slave owners made sure their slaves were kept uneducated. As it is today, if you’re not born into your wealth, the primary way for people to escape from poverty is through education.
It helped to spread the idea that independent freedom came from ownership of one 's self and the ability to enjoy the benefits of their own labor. They detested the idea of "wage-slavery" and debated that the wage worker was freedom personified in America, since he could change jobs, have a firm family and have the ability to gain property. They also believed that slavery was so engraved within the American lifestyle that its termination would have to have large changes in both the North and the South. The abolitionists demanded that regardless of race, that the absolute right to independent liberty should be more important than other
Some may say this because masters in the South saw their slaves as an investment, which makes prefect sense. If the slaves missed a few days working on the plantation because of illness or what the case maybe that resulted in revenue loss. Whereas the North had many other alternatives to making revenue, such as mills and other manufacturing companies; the South basically depending on slaves to have income and to support their
Although many attempts were made to prioritize freedom and equality for all, these values were undermined by racist Southerners who wouldn’t accept equality. In the end, Reconstruction had failed and former slaves endured another hardship akin to slavery. However, Reconstruction still could have prospered. There are multiple events that, if they had occurred, Reconstruction would not have failed. For example, had the government continued to fund the Freedmen’s Bureau, then the South would have legislated their discriminatory laws much later, if not at all.
The North was industrial, and the South was agricultural. This meant that the South 's exports earned more money. The North didn 't like earning less money than the South, so they taxed the South. Anytime a Southerner wanted to export their goods, they had a pay a large tariff. The Southerners felt they were being treated like colonies with no real say in anything.
The South produced cotton, which remained its main cash crop and countless Southerners knew that hefty reliance on slave labor would damage the South ultimately, but their forewarnings were not regarded. The South was constructed on a totalitarian system. Constitutionally the North preferred a loose understanding of the United States Constitution, and they sought to grant the federal government amplified powers. The South desired to reserve all vague powers to the separate states themselves. The South trusted upon slave labor on behalf of their economic wellbeing, and the economy for the North was not
He argues that Africans were just not enslaved because of economic reasons but it was cheaper to bring enslaved Europeans to the New World. He also argues the notion that prejudice against blacks did not create the African slave trade. The first example that Eltis explains is that “ we must explore the labor options of early modern Europeans- both those that were tired and those that were not”(Eltis, 8). Eltis is proving that European labor options where cheaper than African labor options. The second example that Eltis uses is “ the crux of the matter was shipping costs, which comprised by far the greater part of the price of imported bonded labor in Americas”(Eltis, 8).