Smoking Should Be Banned in Hospitals
As smoking cause serious health problems including cancer and heart disease to both active and passive smokers, authorities around the globe are increasing non-smoking zones. In November 2013, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom joined in the global trend by calling for a smoking ban across National Health Service (NHS) hospital sites. According to an article published in British Medical Journal, if this advice was put into practice, health service employees would be forbidden from smoking during work hours and helping patients have a cigarette. Selling cigarettes in hospital stores and building smoking shelters within hospital premises would be outlawed as
…show more content…
Also, smoking ban policy would affect public in positive way like a campaign. Hospitals responsible movement and care toward patients is directly connected with reputation. For example, one of the research papers about health policy implementation in hospital from Canada states that smoking ban policy should be executed rather restrictively and with staffs’ active enforcement to draw effective implementation of smoking ban (Patterson 336). Also, the author of the paper insists that smoking ban policy which is connected to the staff’s duty will elevate the overall reputation of the hospital. Some might argue that banning smoking in hospitals is not so much a good example as a cruel decision for smokers. According to an article in The New York Times, smoking causes long-term stress levels to rise (O’Connor). In addition, Cambridge University researchers found that hospital workers were not smoking outside wards for pleasure or stress reduction but were just driven by chemical dependence. Thus, stress reduction cannot be a valid reason to tolerate smoking on hospital premises. Of course, everyone in hospitals will be offered nicotine replacement therapy and plenty of advice to minimize withdrawal symptoms and to make them feel convinced enough. Additionally, the editor of Blisstree argues …show more content…
Also, after smoking ban policy is implemented and shows effective results, credibility of the hospital will increase which is one of the most important factor when patients choose the hospital. Thus, the hospitals should not neglect their duty to care patients from smoking which is a risky habit worsening their illness and discharging duty of care will lead to both successful adaptation of banning smoking and elevation of hospital’s
Focus for PHE and Preventive Practice Based on the PHE tool used, it was identified that the patient is a longtime smoker and smokes 2-15 cigarettes per day. Although it is beyond standard practice in the CRU, this became the focus for this patient. Specific Actions Taken Due to the patient’s history of cancer, smoking cessation was discussed with the patient. Evidence-Based Nursing Interventions Nurses working in oncology are in a unique position to help patients quit smoking during a time when motivation is usually higher and patients are more willing to quit (Cooley, Sipples, Murphy, and Sarna, 2008). It is estimated that if each nurse helped one smoker quit per year, the quit rate would triple but this can only be achieved through the
Public Service Announcement As many people are aware, smoking is a very big issue. It can damage your heart and blood circulation, causing all sorts of issues. Yet we continue to let it be legal and sold in many, many stores. Once you start smoking you become addicted to cigarettes.
The benefits and progress shown by the introduction of the smoking ban include: • The public began to be more aware of the dangers of passive smoking. • Smoking rates began to decline following the introduction of the ban and have continued to fall each year • Attendances to A&E with smoking related conditions have
The Australian Government now recognises that smoking is “The largest preventable cause of death and disease in Australia”. Whilst I respect that it is one’s personal choice to smoke. I believe that as an employee I have a right to feel safe in my workplace and not be subjected to second-hand smoke, as this appears to be more harmful than smoking itself.
Every year in the United States, more than 480,000 people die from tobacco use and exposure to second hand smoke ("Smoking Facts"). Smoking is also the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. This makes smoking more harmful than aids, alcohol, drug abuse, car crashes, murders, suicides and fires combined. Bonnie VanDenBerg of Ireton, Iowa shared with me what life was like while smoking and what it was like after quitting.
A ban on using e cigarettes in public places could be damaging to help them quit” says Rosana o’ Conner from Public Heath England. (pickover, 2016).Therefore, we should not discourage this promising new approaches that might change this picture. It 's not only smokers who are impacted by the effects of
Topic: Is vaping safer than traditional smoking? Everyone knows that smoking can be harmful to us but people continue to smoke even with the gory pictures on traditional cigarette boxes. Government has increases the price of cigarettes to reduce the smoking habit of our citizen but it is not an effective way to keep people from lighting up. Last few years, vape, electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes came out as a ‘cure’ to those addicted to conventional cigarettes, safe lives and reduce health bills. Vaping is an electronic cigarette that is non-flammable, battery-powered devices that use a small rechargeable battery, a safe replaceable cartridge containing propylene glycol, small amount of nicotine, and a variety of flavouring liquid.
Recently, there is a new invention that has become public interest from country’s leader to citizen due to the rise of one device that called e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes or Vape are electronic devices intended to deliver nicotine with flavorings, which up to 7700 different flavors and some other chemicals into vapor. The amount of users of this device has increased in the past couple of years, which contributed $6 billion to the economy in 2015 itself, this is so as it is often portrayed as a healthier substitute for the regular cigarettes though this statement has yet been proven true. The question is: should the government ban the use of e-cigarettes? In my opinion, government should ban the use of e-cigarettes because it is detrimental to health,
Smoking is a choice and no one is forcing that upon people. The public has been well warned about the risks of smoking; therefore, the people smoking are fully aware that their lives are at risk. Tobacco companies should not be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths because once people put the tobacco in their mouths, they are putting there own life at risk themselves, and because as individuals we have a choice on whether or not to smoke cigarette. It 's true that tobacco companies aren 't accountable for why people smoke. Nonetheless, every tobacco product has a warning label on it therefore it 's not the companies responsibility from smoking-related illnesses and deaths.
It affects the health of the human beings and also the environment. Despite having all these negative effects, tobacco is of great economic importance as it creates employment for the citizens. The negative effects of tobacco smoking supersede its positive contributions. Therefore, tobacco smoking should be banned. .
Smoking has been a long time habit round the world. However, in the past, smoking cigarette was very popular and known to be a cool recreational drug, and was widely accepted by the community across the world. Today smoking has been less widely accepted and more restricted because of the many health risks that are linked to smoking cigarette. These days, people are well educated and more knowledgeable about the health risks of smoking.
General Purpose: to persuade Specific Purpose: to persuade the audience of the importance of banning smoking in public places Thesis: Smoking should be banned in public places because it is harmful to non-smokers who visit public places. I. Introduction A. Attention-getter: How many of you been around people who are smoking in public places? Probably, most of us have at least noticed people smoking in CMU campus even it is a non-smoking campus. Secondhand smoke is really harmful to anyone who inhales it in.
Many reports have been issued based on the evidence regarding the devastating health affecs of smoking and the expose of second hand smoke. Unfortunatly, cigarette smoking has reportedly caused about 480,000 deaths anually in the United States with an account of 41,000 deaths due to second hand smoking. It is indicated that America has the greatest heath issues from smoking. Neverless, it has been declining due to the rise on taxes and the promotions to cut down tabacco use advetisement. Smoking can be very addictive but there are many ways to help stop that I’ll get to soon.
The Supreme court banned smoking is some areas. I think smoking should be banned from all public places because of the disease that it can cause and all the harm it can do to people. People should have the right to walk wherever they want without being around the affects of someone smoking outside or worrying about having their life put in danger. If everyone make a campaign against smoking it can soon possibly get banned from all public places. I would start a campaign and try to get the attention from the government to have smoking banned so no one gets harmed or have to walk outside smelling the smell of
Smoking has become a social habit nowadays. When people around are smoking, the person practically feel like he/she should be doing the same. And this is increasing day by day in our country. Smoking tribulates almost every organ of the body. It is the leading cause of more than 443,00 deaths each year.