Despite disparate origins, both St Louis and Cleveland are historically industrial cities. St Louis which was once just an outpost and trading hub to the west eventually turned into an industrial force boasting a skyline dotted with power plants, warehouses, and breweries. On the other hand, Cleveland, being a member of the manufacturing belt, was situated right in the middle of american industrialization. Clevelands proximity to the waterways of the great lakes, canals, and railroads allowed them access to the raw materials needed to manufacture steel products. St Louis similarly benefitted from being located on the western bank of the Mississippi River. The history of both cities has had profound impacts on the social and economic development …show more content…
Cleveland grows southward and St Louis grows westward. The explanation is that high rent residences tend to pull the entire city in the same physical direction. This is a characteristic of the sector model, which I believe both cities to fall under. Then new residential areas extend farther and farther outward along select transportation axes. For St Louis, they extend along 4 interstate highways that lead into the CBD I-55, I-46, I-64, and I-70 and for Cleveland they extend along 2 interstate highways, I-71 and I-70. Then a filtering process occurs when groups like the middle class abandon their areas, lower-income groups filter into them. This leads to patterns of sectors instead of concentric rings. Both cities have similar sectors when it comes to economics, they each have a service and light/heavy manufacturing sector. However, they differ in that St Louis has a research sector and Cleveland has a Health Care center. The reason this type of model occurs in both of these cities is that high-rent residents historically have wanted to move away from the industrial sectors for quality of life reasons. Thus low-income residents tend to live close to these areas with adverse health effects leading to missing work and spending money on health products. This results in a lack of ability to move up the social ladder and possibly move out of these areas. …show more content…
In the 20th century they were a desireable location during the great migration, which was the movement of 6 million african americans from the South to the North and Midwest. They moved to avoid segregation and in search of job opportunities in the booming manufacturing industry. Prior to the great migration, approximately 1.4% of the population of Cleveland was African-American. 10 years following the start in 1920, approximately 4.3% of the population was African-American and would continue to increase over the next 50 years. Today Cleveland is very much segregated by poverty and race despite 53.3% of the population being African-American. The largest section of poverty in the city is the Northeast which is exactly where the African-Americans are segregated to. As a whole, Cleveland isn’t doing a good job with their property. The median property value is 66,200 with a 0.46% growth rate while St Louis has a median property value of 130,800 with a 14.9% growth rate. In retrospect, it’s quite sad to think that many of the ancestors of African Americans living in Cleveland originally moved to there to escape segregation and find a stable job in manufacturing and eventually grow socially only to have their families live in the same unhealthy areas they did 50 years later and not progress up the social
Cleveland is becoming the city to live in economically and that is why relocating is the answer. Cleveland has many valuable resources to offer. The beautiful beaches all over Cleveland provide places that Marvel Studios could film. Lake Erie is a great lake and it surrounds Cleveland with attractions. Also, the city has downtown attractions such as Tower City, Progressive Field, Quicken Loans Arena, and many more venues.
Document A Businesses went from low income friendly to high-income friendly. Low-income housing decreased in Woodward from 1995-2012 -Social housing increased from 1995 to 2012 It would have been better to live in Woodward in 1995 because the properties are low income friendly and more people have the opportunity to live there. Many people in Woodward in 1995 would be put in the stereotype that low-income people are committing crimes Gentrification is not okay because many people in the world have issues with finances.
The Cleveland Policy Planning Report of 1975 was written as an initial response to the social and economic hardships plaguing residents in Cleveland during the rust belt city era. Norman Krumholz, the executive director of the Cleveland Planning Commission at the time, felt that the commission had a responsibility to serve Cleveland by assessing planning related issues and recommending goals designed to aid the residents suffering the most. Realizing the tremendous imbalance of income and power between residents, the commission derived an overall goal "of promoting a wider range of choices for those individuals and groups who have few, if any, choices. " Priority was given to the analysis of the following factors: income, housing, transportation
Detroit is the highest populated city in the U.S. state of Michigan. It is also the largest city in the state of Michigan. It is the largest in the United States that shares a border with Canada. Detroit was first incorporated as a city in 1815. There were numerous amounts of soldiers that fought from the union who volunteered to fight during the American Civil War.
Gentrification is a fast growing process in most cities today. Displacement through gentrification has many side effects for low-income families. Gentrification is a major problem; it is the displacement of people of lower socioeconomic status and replacing them with people of higher economic status, raising the property rates on these gentrified properties so that the lower classes can no longer afford to live there and further creating social inequality among the citizens of our community. We take broken parts of town and convert them into lavish attractions for visitors and natives. These so-called broken parts of town have residents who can no longer afford to live in these parts.
Education in that area is usually segregated and holds a poor learning style. Some public services are not provided and you would have to go to other towns to use them like library’s, parks or schools. Poor housing can define a community and there income rate.
Lance Freeman, an associate professor of urban planning in Columbia, wanted to investigate if there was any displacement going on in two predominantly black neighborhoods that was briskly gentrifying. Much to his dismay, he couldn’t find any correlation between gentrification and displacement. What was surprising to Freeman was his discovery, “poor residents and those without a college education were actually less likely to move if they resided in gentrifying neighborhoods”. (Sternbergh, 19) Freeman adds, “The discourse on gentrification, has tended to overlook the possibility that some of the neighborhood changes associated with gentrification might be appreciated by the prior residents.” (Sternbergh, 19)
People began to settle in the cities and oftentimes those were located near waterways (Schultz, 2013). With factory development and market expansion, urbanization was a slow process (Schultz, 2013). Requiring wood as a source of power for railroads and steamboats, as well as clearing land as people moved west, had dramatic environmental effects (Schultz, 2013). With the development of factories, the labor force changed in that oftentimes, women worked in the factories (Schultz, 2013). During this time the development of the working class and the middle class was set apart (Schultz, 2013).
It is this displacement that causes segregation in cities like Cleveland, Ohio and Tuscaloosa, Alabama. However, if the meaning of gentrification is changed, and people work towards making sure the upper-income families and the underprivileged are able to live together in the same community, segregation would subside. As suggested
This form of travel allowed people to travel much quicker on round trip shipping to rivers of Mississippi, Ohio, and Missouri. Steamboats also facilitated the grown of urban areas such as St. Louis and New Orleans. The result of the steamboat was the first ever demand for regulation of private industry from the people. During this same time period, there was an increasing need for alternative waterways so canals were built in order to fill this need.
When it comes to the effects of urban sprawl on the poorer people, they are left behind in the more undesirable inner parts of the city. Urban sprawl causes the government to increase taxes on the houses outside the city and place restrictions on building new homes within the city. Just like any issue pertaining to government, urban sprawl has its pros and cons. Based on what I’ve read, I don’t think this is a moral or ethical issue.
Hence, they tend to view wealthier areas as model or ideal neighborhoods. Thus, it is unlikely for them to implement policies that would create highly-black neighborhood because of poverty and negative effects associated to concentrated poverty (Einstein and Glick 889). This scenario calls to maintain the status quo. Political Constraints and Limitations: The main political constraint and limitation of this policy is that the current status quo also provides burden to the federal budget.
Because of the expansion of the railroads throughout the upper Midwest and east, the manufacturing and retail sectors grew rapidly and also it became the dominant Midwestern center for industrialization, such as manufacturing, commerce, and finance. And Chicago has also
From a theoretical point of view, the rationale of rent gap theory is suggesting that gentrification activities will probably occur for neighborhoods and homes in case where speculations of land or properties exist. This theory was first argued by a renowned geographer, Neil Smith, and further unevenly developed by several theorists, pointing out that if there is a potential disinvestment in property occurs, which means the estimated value generated from the piece of land or the property is higher than the current use, the rent that can be extracted will become gradually less. The extent of the gap will always tend to be developed between the rental value of the property and that which could be derived a higher reinvested use. All in all, these
Similarities and Differences between Two Cities A city is a place where a large number of populations resides for the permanent period of time. City’s importance depends upon the size, location, and structure of the area. Cities have the highly organized population which is comparatively bigger than town or village. A city can provide different opportunities to know about the culture and language.