On the Social and Political Philosophy of Plato
Philosophy is the study of the ultimate causes of things known in the light of reason. Or so the definitive meaning of philosophy would state. Philosophy is the love of wisdom as the etymological definition would give. But what is Philosophy when put into the context of Social and Political Philosophy? Social means pertaining to the society. While political means pertaining to the affairs of the state. Deriving a definition from the common notions of the terms, Social and Political Philosophy is the study of the ultimate causes of the matters of the society and state. But that is still too vague of a definition to start with. Let us analyze the definition piece by piece. ‘Philosophy is the study
…show more content…
According to Plato, the soul has three parts, namely: reason, spirit and appetite. For Plato the soul is the source of locomotion and life for an individual. It is his belief that the body itself is inanimate, and in need of a something to animate it, and this something is the soul. Appetite and Spirit are the irrational part of the soul. They tend to seek the earthly pleasure of this earth, and if not guided by reason would degrade a person to succumb to vices. Reason should be in control of spirit and appetite in order for a person to be moral and good. Plato had used the analogy of the two horses and the charioteer to describe the three parts of the soul. The two horses are spirit and appetite while the charioteer is reason. If the charioteer is inattentive and does not direct the two horses, the two horses would lead the charioteer a different place than intended. So in order to attain peace, the charioteer must take control of the reigns and lead them to the right …show more content…
Reason must not be kept in the dark. Knowledge is vital for the charioteer in order for him to lead them to the right place. The charioteer must know how to keep the horses in place. He must know when to rest, when to pull the reigns, how tight must he pull the reigns. So does reason, reason must know how to balance appetite and spirit, in order for a person to be morally good. According to Plato, the irrational part of the soul is imperfect and has the tendency to the pleasure of earthly things. These imperfections can be further intensified by the society that one lives in. For an erroneous society promulgating vices would deceive an individual into accepting that they are correct. That is why one must be not ignorant of these things. The individual being composed of these rational and irrational parts has already the tendency to be corrupt if not properly
People think irrationally all the time. Sometimes it’s over something very minor like arguments over what they want to eat, but sometimes it can be as large as murder and crime. In Sophocles's play Antigone, Creon is the king of Thebes, and he has a tendency to act very irrationally. Acting on his immediate emotions, Creon displeased the gods when he refused to bury Polynices and when he sentenced Antigone to death. Teiresias warned Creon about the consequences of his actions, but he let his emotions get the better of him and he lost his family for it.
Reason is the part that guides the other parts of the soul, it analysis and rationalizes options, and determines the best overall choice. Spirit is the part that is passionate and strives to conquer challenges, while appetite is the part that desires pleasures and comforts. Plato states that all three parts are balanced properly when reason the one in charge, but when poorly balanced, virtue is lost and vices begin to form. Ignorance is a vice. In Philabus, Plato states that when harmony of the soul is disrupted, one becomes self-ignorant, and can acquire a false sense of beauty, wealth, and virtue.
From the results of his study, Zimbardo explains the Lucifer Effect and how morally righteous people can do malicious things. The effect of both the one’s current
Plato breaks the justification of knowledge down into two types of realms that show what can be known by reason and what can be known by the five senses. These realms, then divided into two other unequal parts based on their clarity and truthfulness, make up what is known as The Divided Line. By understanding The Divided Line we can fully grasp the differences between the perceptual, also known as becoming, realm and the conceptual, also known as being, realm. The perceptual realm is the opinions and beliefs of people or it can be known as the visible realm.
Unlike human will, human reason is free and has no innate morality. Human reason is persuaded by the external world and is influenced by other people’s thoughts and actions. In other words, the reasoning of one person can rub off onto other people, sending a ripple of ideas out into society. It is the element in which humans control and use to handle their thoughts and actions. Through human reason, people become imperfect and in short, human.
The just person’s soul entails motive for certain kinds of objects the most important of which is knowledge. Socrates describes the hardship and extreme effort required to gain knowledge of the forms and the form of the good, thus the just person will seek learning and not spend time to take care of the satisfaction of desires that typically lead to unjust actions. This approach to unite the gap between a just soul and just actions may have some drawbacks. One negative aspect may be that several unjust actions may be motivated by desires that are compatible with the desire for knowledge. For example, why wouldn’t a person with a great fascination for knowledge steal a book if it would contribute to their
“An irrational society is a society of moral cowards—of men paralyzed by the loss of moral standards, principles, and goals. But since men have to act, so long as they live, such as a society is read to be taken over by anyone willing to set its direction. The initiative can come from only two types of men: either from the man who is willing to assume the responsibility of asserting rational values--- or from the thug who is not troubled by questions of responsibility.” Ayn Rand explains that in order to survive in an irrational society, you have to overcome the fear of moral judgement, and let that be your responsibility. In “Anthem”, Equality 7-2521 understand the evils of an irrational society—which is fear of moral judgement.
“An irrational society is a society of moral cowards – of men paralyzed by the loss of moral standards, principles, and goals” (86) says Rand, and I feel that too far have the men in the society sunk away from moral standards, like putting their knowledge to use and expanding it, simply because they do not believe in judging others for fear of what others may see in them, especially Equality since he always abides by the strict standards with fear of the civilization itself. Equality would certainly agree with Rand’s advice, “One must never fail to pronounce moral judgement”, as Equality did by leaving the controlled society that brainwashed
In “The Allegory of the Cave”, Plato concludes that the ultimate definition of “the Good” is the effort to pursue knowledge and the insight which knowledge can provide the blinded mind. In this paper, I will further analyze his definition of “the Good” and my personal views on this definition given by Plato. Through the metaphor of the cave, this definition of “the Good” covers how experiences give knowledge, how knowledge broadens perspective, and how knowledge gives a more moderate perspective which leads to good actions. I believe that through this process knowledge leads people to “the Good” for they must be able to recognize their behaviors before they can accurately judge their actions. I will provide clear examples of each of these points
Those who commit wicked acts because they can not see what is truly good have a skewed point of view for a reason. Their character is tainted by vice because they have habitually committed vicious acts in the past. Since they originally had a conscience, they must have willingly committed wrongdoing to warp their perception of what is good. Therefore, those who pursue an apparent good but commit wrong acts, due to a skewed appearance of what is good, are still responsible for their
Our rationality and reason give us the ability to distinguish between good and bad, just and unjust, and to assess whether or not we are good people. It also gives us the capability to understand and perform higher intellectual activities. The three alternatives can also be said to be split into 2 categories, the rational part of the soul and the non-rational part of the soul. The life of growth and perception falls
Plato 's Life and Accomplishments Plato was a philosopher who was born in Greece somewhere around 428 BCE to a family of the political and social elite. Since Plato was somewhat associated with this group, he had the opportunity to study many different subjects from many different teachers until he famously became a disciple of Socrates. Socrates was executed a few years later in 399 BCE for corrupting the youth and failing to observe the gods. After his death, Plato faithfully continued and adapted his philosophical tradition but never forgot that his teacher died as a result of democratic vote.
This ideology will be addressed in the essay with substantiated reasons on why Plato thought that philosophers should rule. 1.1 DEFINITIONS OF KEY TERMS 2 PLATO BIOGRAPHY Plato was born around the year 428 BCE in Athens. Plato 's birth name was Aristocles, and he gained the nickname Platon, meaning broad, because of his broad build. His family had a history in politics, and Plato was destined to a life in keeping with this history. He studied at a gymnasium owned by Dionysios, and at the palaistra of Ariston of Argos.
In Book IV of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and his peers come to the conclusion that a city is going to need people who have an understanding of what justice should be. Socrates at the end of Book IV can make the difference between individual, political, and social justice. He knows that individual and political justice is so much in common because they both weigh in heavy on truth, honor, and appetitive soul. That appetitive soul is an element that helps the secure the just community with love and support.
But in further analysis, the amoralist has a more fundamental understanding of the human condition. While Kant, who actively couldn 't support the fact that the definition of "rationality" surpasses it 's suggested simplicity, the amoralists are cognizant that refraining from situations that test a person 's well-being do not define them as being "irrational. " Kant simply overlooked certain situations. If a robber came into a bank with the intention of stealing cash, the rational thing to do would prevent the robbery from occurring. The maxim would be ideal, if everyone tried to stop a robber from pointing guns at people, the world would be a fruitful place.