Studies show that when people quit smoking they spend their money in different sectors of the economy creating more jobs and economic growth. Tobacco consumption in countries that had a ban showed a dramatic decrease in consumers compared to countries that did not have the ban in place. The ban on tobacco only works if it is properly implemented and tobacco control policies are intact. The opposition of the ban contend that the government is overstepping boundaries by telling adults that they are not able to decide what is good or bad for themselves. Also they argue that individuals who smoke are doing so of their own free will and that they know the effects of smoking and decide to smoke anyway.
In the Baltimore Sun editorial, an anonymous author writes about the positive effects of sin taxes in an article entitled “Sin Taxes Save Lives by Changing Unhealthy Behaviors.” The author presents the case that sin taxes benefit society because they change consumer behavior and promote a healthier, more active lifestyle. The writer states, “Americans are consuming too many sugary drinks that contribute to rising obesity and diabetes rates. The latest weapon in the public health arsenal to combat the problem—taxing them—deserves more serious consideration.” The author of the article continues explaining how consumers will lead healthier lifestyles by expanding on two main points that attest to the improvement of society. The author’s first reason for supporting sin taxes is because the increased price for products changes consumer behavior. The author expands on his point by stating, “It’s not just a matter of revenue for cash-strapped local governments but an effort to fundamentally change consumer behavior.” By placing a higher tax on products deemed unhealthy, the public has a smaller opportunity to purchase these goods.
Decisions have the maximum public health benefit if they are proportional as well as evidence-based and possess logical explanations of benefits and risks. According to a research team from the Queen Mary University of London, electronic cigarettes should be allowed to compete with analogue cigarettes in the market. Health care specialists may direct smokers who are reluctant to terminate nicotine use to shift to electronic cigarettes. The target groups include smokers who have not succeeded in quitting with current treatments (Hajek et al.,
Smoking cigarettes is burning holes in your pockets. The money people spend on cigarettes, they could put towards something that they really want like cars, boats, houses and other recreational objects. This paper is going to include: cigarette taxes in Ohio, taxes in Ohio virus other states, effects of smoking and secondhand smoke on teen smokers, and adult smokers. In Nebraska, 64 cents per pack is taxed on cigarettes . It is also lower than the national average by nearly one dollar” I(unmc.edu).
The European Union has focused on the impact of tobacco use with the first EU tobacco-control legislation in the late 1980s. The EU legislated policies have been further developed with its certain purposes. The EU aimed to encourage tobacco users to cease and protect their citizens who are exposed to second-hand smoke in order that citizens could reside and work in smoke-free environments. The reason why the EU has endeavored to intervene with the production and consumption of tobacco has originated in one factor: negative externality. Negative externality can be defined as an adverse effect of production and consumption of goods or services, which imposes external costs on the third party outside the market.
President Roosevelt also intervened in the stock market by regulating stock trading, so that the Stock Market Crash would never happen again. Ultimately Roosevelt's decision to intervene during this crisis was the key reason that the United States were able to recover from The Great Depression.The policies implemented created modern liberalism within the United States. Therefore it is evident that governments providing a social safety net for citizens can be beneficial to the quality of life of its
Further, government can use taxes an incentives for the producers to cut back on pollution (Pigou, 1920s). For example, in the gasoline case, the negative externality could be internalized by putting taxes on the gasoline or charging a kind of levy for people driving within city area. These kinds of measures would make driving personal cars within city more expensive, which would encourage people to correct their behavior and might shift to use public transportation services such as bus and taxi. The costs could also be internalized by enforcing stricter rules and regulations on fuel efficiency or
It is not only control the marketing for producer on sugar-sweetened drinks, but also decrease the consumption by fat tax. According to the research on internet about tax and negative externalities, this is a best way to solve the public health challenge associated with the deterioration of the population’s dietary habits. Maybe it is difficult for government to change the daily habits, but the way to added fat tax is a kind of solution to maintain the condition of marketing. Because we can’t disregard that sugar-sweetened is detrimental to health. At the same time, it will bring a lot of negative affect for the marketing of sugar-sweetened drinks in a short term.
I strongly disagree that electronic cigarette should be banned. Of course smoking is a bad habit by itself probably one of the worst habits humankind developed but we have to see in detail that there are certain facts. Some research have concluded that e-cigarette are helpful in reducing or eliminating tobacco use which means smoking. Before explaining that I would like to share what is electronic cigarettes and how does it work. The history of electronic cigarettes is originated from China and invented by Hon Lik a Chinese pharmacist from north east China.
Legalizing marijuana will help a country like Nigeria exceedingly. Marijuana use in Nigeria should be legalized for both medicinal and casual. Authorizing the use will help Nigeria’s economy, increase in employment rate and decrease in crime rate, medicinal use will also help the health care system. Disallowing the usage of marijuana also means loss of personal freedom. Others against the Legalization of marijuana will say the drug can be extremely addictive and terrible for mental health.