Ever since the United States had been a single nation, there had been many differences between the North and the South. Among these differences included social, economic, and political differences. Social differences included the two sides of slavery - Abolition and the Pro-slavery groups. The belief of Abolition, which was against slavery was mostly in the North, while Pro-slavery, which supported the idea of keeping slavery was the central idea in the South. The economic differences between the North and the South was mainly between industrial/manufacturing and the South’s reliance on cotton. The North had been focused on industrial/manufacturing without using slaves, unlike the South which had relied on cotton picked by slaves. Political …show more content…
The North and the South had many civil variations between their separate sides of slavery, Abolition and Pro-slavery. Abolition was the idea highly against slavery and the idea wanting to abolish it with supporters such as Angelina Grimke who believed that “slavery was a sin”(The Abolitionist) and Frederick Douglas who said that his “first encounter of slavery would haunt him to his grave”(The Abolitionist). Grimke as well as Douglass’s experiences and thoughts of slavery were concerning because what they said means that slavery was really disturbing to them and if it was alarming to them to the point of them wanting to abolish it means that it was really discomforting to see. On the other hand, Pro-slavery groups had believed that slavery was the South’s way of life. The South argued during one of their disputes with the North that if Slavery was to be abolished, their economy would be destroyed (Deverell & White). During the time that the North had been arguing with the South to abolish slavery, the South believed that if slavery was to be abolished that their economy would be destroyed because their slaves were the only ones picking cotton and other crops but the South did not want wage labor instead they wanted the slaves to do the hard work while they get paid. Social diversities between the North and the South was not the only conflict differentiating the two but so was their economical
For many years leading to the Civil War slavery has been an ongoing argument between the North and the South. Both regions have their own arguments for either side of their cases. The North was strongly against the idea of enslaving human beings while the South saw the advantages of owning slaves. James Henry Hammond demonstrates that slaves are less beneficial to the economy because they cost more than free labor, although he does contradict himself, Hinton Rowan continues to explain the North demand for southern merchandise.
In the town of Pennsylvania, Gettysburg, 3,000 Union soldiers prepared to face 60,000 Confederate soldiers in battle. The Battle of Gettysburg is known to have been the day the Union regained its ground. An estimated 50,000 soldiers were killed, captured or wounded. The battle turned out to be a crushing defeat for the Confederacy. However, if the Confederacy turned out to be successful in conquering the Union at Gettysburg, the outcome of the Civil War would have been different than things turned out to be.
The United States was divided into two sections: the North and the South. The differences between these two regions were so profound that they eventually led to conflict and war. One key factor contributing to sectionalism was economic differences. The North was largely industrialized, while the South relied heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton production. This resulted in starkly different priorities for each region: the North prioritized tariffs and other policies that would protect their industries, while the South demanded free trade so that they could continue exporting their agricultural products.
P.6 Compromises seemed to be working in 1820 as a solution to political issues that America agreed to disagreed on. As seen in the Missouri Compromise, where Henry Clay made slaves free in twelve states and not free in the other twelve; in order to keep everything balanced. But between the period of 1820 to 1860, compromising took a shift and no longer seemed to be the solution. Compromises worked with Henry Clay in the Missouri compromise in 1820 but by 1860 due to a series of geographic, political, and social changes compromises were impossible.
The two opposing sides were the North and the South. The North, known also as the Union, was against slavery of African Americans and wanted it abolished. The South, also known as the Confederacy, believed in slavery. The South depended on slave labor for agriculture and their economy. The North thought it was morally wrong to enslave a man or woman.
So if you did not like slavery, you moved to the North, and this only helped divide the people by their opinions. On document 1 there are 2 maps, one of railroads, and one of slave density and cotton production. This divide made the country’s economy completely different. While the North had almost no cotton production, the south is full of plantations creating slave based profit. The North used factories and modern technology for profit and the South was almost purely dedicated to raw materials such as cotton, hay, and other cash crops.
The Nation grew increasingly divided through the mid-1800’s over the issue of slavery, to the extent that it bled into other issues, primarily as a tensioned pretense to admis-sion of new states to the Union. Presidents prior to Polk either passively or actively re-sisted the annexation of new territories or promoting statehood, recognizing the issue of slavery and probable effects of spreading or denying slavery. The North’s ideological opposition to slavery was equally as legitimate as the South’s reasoning, but with slave labor accounting for up to 50 percent of the population in the South, there was also ac-ceptance on economical basis. Vast new lands became American territory throughout this period, while other disputed lands had boundaries
Due to different views on the topic of slavery, the two sides of the United States had very different economies. The North was using more industrialized products and factories were very common up in the North. In the South, however, they used more plantations and less factories. The South’s economy was very agricultural while the North’s economy was very factory oriented. It demonstrated differences in a very obvious way.
Prior to the Civil War, the north and south viewed liberty and freedom differently. Slavery was one of the issues that they did not see eye to eye on but also territorial expansion and tariffs on imports from other countries brought great opposition as well. Most slaves worked as agricultural laborers, but they were also employed in factories and mines. The success of the southern states depended on enslaved labor, and that dependence made the structure on slavery in the south all the deeper and inescapable.
As slavery slowly started to cease in the North, it became much more widespread in the South. For the slaveholders living in the South, the election of Abraham Lincoln came as a disappointment because he was against slavery. Southerners saw slavery as a necessity for the manufacturing of goods such as cotton, corn, other crops. The North, on the other hand, believed that slavery was immoral and went against the Constitution. The debates over this topic would soon be a major factor in the upcoming Civil War.
There were many differences between the North and the South. For instance, the South were very agricultural as opposed to the North which were industrial. The South used cheap labor in the form of slaves, whereas the North had workers do their jobs in factories at a faster pace. Because of sectionalism, competition between the north and the south began to increase.
Nick Baxter What caused the Civil War? DBQ The Civil War was caused by three main reasons are economic differences, interpretation of Constitution, and moral beliefs. The North and the South were very different economically.
Between 1800 and 1850, the North and South had grown distinctively different but they also had some similarities. Some of the differences & similarities between the North and South included the economy, social attitudes & structures, and daily life. The North and the South had differences & similarities with their economies. The North and the South had farmers and everyone including children worked on the family farms. As time went by, the North became more industrialized and manufacturing became the center point of their economy not agriculture.
Two fundamental questions normally surround the history of any war: whether the war was inevitable and if it was necessary. These same questions emerge any time during debates regarding the American Civil war. The most cited cause of the Civil war is the secession of certain southern states that formed the Confederate States of America in January 1861. Thomas Bonner writes "Civil War Historians and the "Needless War" Doctrine" arguing that Southern Carolina seceded in 1860, followed by six other states by January the following year. A deep analysis of the events leading to the war indicates that the Union and the Confederates had profound ideological, economic, political, and social differences.
The north has Bad farmland therefore they didn't have great agriculture. South has great farmland which meant they had a very good economy for agriculture and cash crops and much more. Secound was there various differences in the economy of the North and South. In the North for economy their was immigrants,textiles,cotton, and