Male vs. Female Leadership
Due to social roles that each gender has, from past to now man has been portrayal and accepted eligible in high status related occupations whereas woman has been shown secondary and subordinate occupations as teacher, nurse and housewife. Life conditions and economic circumstances as a result of Second World War got worsened and economy shifted from production sectors to services sectors. In this time period women preferred to join workforce to support household economy and woman labor ratio increased rapidly. And also improving education level and changing social norms has strenghtened place of the woman in workforce.
Taking into account Leadership styles whether gender has effective role in leadership is controversial
…show more content…
Then I decided to search for the relationship between ‘personality’ and ‘leadership’. There was an important study about this point. In 1999, Kakadapse has done a research in Cranfield Business School about men and women’s leadership success and as a result they found actually their successes are equal but it can be change up to their personality and loyalty to institution. In the recent past, Eagly and Johnson’s (1990) gender differences in leadership behavior research results provide that women leaders are more democratic and participant despite men are more autocratic and overbearing and women are care more about human relationships. Also, Bernard Bass was mention about female leaders differences tan male leaders and he wrote that, female leaders are more emphasis on friendships, relationships, flexible, tolerant toward workers than male leaders. I think these characteristics of female leaders can increase the workers …show more content…
According to Gardiner and Tiggemann’s (1999) research result, there is a significant difference between male and female leaders. Women leaders have more interpersonal relationship-oriented style and task-oriented style than men. Also they support that interpersonal relationship-oriented style are more in predominantly female industry like children’s education and no gender difference in male dominant industry like automotive industry. I think this kind of studies and results cause to strengthen some prejudice toward women. Today, women have become an important part of the labor force , differently from men they face many obstacles in the working life . Ruble and others (1984), in their research, women are facing. They found that the obstacles in the way : Gender stereotypes and determined by sex , creating obstacles for women in working life , and they seek to protect those patterns. Creating equal opportunities for women in employment are in a position to put against this obstacle to be successful. The first of these obstacles; historically been occupied by men employed habits is because of the very high prestigious business with. Secondly; due is determined by gender stereotypes and sex, many women in male -specific that is breaking the courage of thought about business. As I stated in my writing before, I think success in work is not about gender it is mostly connected with perseverance,
Women also commonly face a lack of promotional opportunities in the workplace. Men are often favored or given more opportunities than women for leadership positions. Women are even overlooked for these positions, even when highly (or overly) qualified. Michelle Harper covers this issue in many different interviews and in her book. She was often turned down promotional opportunities due to being a woman in medicine.
During and after the Civil War, women’s demand in job keeps increasing. They desired to work and be independent, which means they tried to have more identities, except for housewife. Moreover, they desired to own equal pay and equal opportunities in workplace, compared to men. Quested for decades, Congress finally passes the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as part of Fair Labor Standard Act of 1938, for prohibiting employers wage discriminating employees based on gender. Equal Pay Act of 1963 specifically regulates that “No employer having employees subject to any provision of this section shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed..at which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which requires equal similar working conditions”.
In the text, the unfair and unjust treatment of women in the workplace are revealed to full
It is the masculine ideals and norms that are privileged over others in society. The participant also noted that if she wanted to be in leadership position it would be a challenge considering that the higher up in rank you go in any career there will be more males. To lead as female and a woman, would require a change in the way you behave and speak but at the same, “you have to cater to people around you, you can’t be threatening cause you’re a woman or you’ll be seen as bossy and overbearing,” said participant four. This communication barrier is the kind that is described in the Tannen excerpt, “[W]orkplaces that have had men in positions of power have already established male-style interactions as the norm.”
I would say that it’s true that sexism plays an important role when someone is trying to a get a job or not in this world. For example, when employees have a male manager, they start to think that he’s a leader for telling them do. However, if those same employees had a female manager who was telling tell them what to do then the employees would think she’s bossy instead of a leader. Additionally, for the most part that example is usually not criticized by people because sexism has entered their brain in a subconscious way so they don’t think it’s a problem for employees to think that a male manger is a leader while thinking a female manager is bossy. Moreover, Frye states, “For every type of occasion there are distinct clothes, gear, and accessories, hair-dos, cosmetics and scents, labeled as “ladies” or “men’s” and labeling us as females or males, and most of the time most of us choose, use, wear or bear the paraphernalia associated with our sex” (Frye, p.847).
There are more doctors, professors, writers, dentists, lawyers, than ever. However, women are still misrepresented in areas such as Congress and the top positions in the business world, such as CEO’s, board members, and executives. While the movement for women has been a long battle, the battle is far from over. Diversity is necessary and will be necessary for years to come. Therefore, the equality of women in the workplace is just as
According to Stephanie Coontz. In her article “The Myth of Male Decline”. The essence of this article is that in spite of all the new information of sex equality picks up in the working environment, women are not working out quite as well as reported. Coontz arguments is fundamentally that this new data with respect to women improving, and not withstanding outflanking, men in the working environment are extraordinarily overstated and that it is still basically a male-dominated world. She says that associations are simply putting this data out there trying to conceal the disparity that still exists in today's "dynamic" work environment.
Gender Stratification in The Workplace Over the years, women have fought their way through the various barriers thrown at them by society, they are now more educated, matching male participation rates in the labour force and they are seen to create more opportunities for themselves in the workplace. Despite these achievements, gender stratification still exists in organizations and corporations in the 21st century; this paper seeks to analyze the numerous reasons why women remain underrepresented in leadership positions in the workplace and how this causes a trickle-down effect for other females in non-managerial positions. One of the major factors influencing the progress women experience in their career advancement stems from the deep cultural-infused gender stereotypes associated
However, it can be difficult to assess the decrease of sexism, therefore multiple factors must be analyzed. Definitely, mindset must be analyzed and therefore modern entertainment must be analyzed to represent the speech of the people. Since women now get equal opportunities in education, we must analyze women in the workforce. However, with increasing participation in the work force, equal opportunities, globalization and forcing needs, sexism is seen as both still existent in today’s society, but also to a great extent less than it was in the past.
Indeed, men and women can be just as different in the professional world as they are in their personal lives. What executives are just beginning to understand is that these differences can be great for business. I believe that in conclusion to all research done that the glass ceiling theory, gender pay gap and advancement in careers will all still be present in many years to come, mainly because people do not see it as such a big deal, when really it is. Every person in a workplace male or female should be treated equally and
In an organization, the hierarchy usually consists of a singular or group of power at the top with subsequent levels of power beneath them. This is the commonly used way of delegating staff or members of the organization in most organizations. Corporations, governments, and religious organizations are hierarchical organizations with different levels of management, power and authority. The workplace has sometimes been referred to as an inhospitable place for women due to the multiple forms of gender inequalities present (Abrams, 1991). Some examples of how workplace discrimination negatively affects women’s earnings and opportunities are the gender wage gap (Peterson and Morgan, 1995), the scarcity of women in leadership (Eagly and Carli, 2007), and the longer time required for women compared to men to advance in their careers (Blau and DeVaro, 2007).
Furthermore, Chinese women have to face gender discrimination in workplaces. According to Zhaopin survey, the leadership positions were still dominated by men in China. About 72 percent participants had men as their direct supervisors, while only 28 percent had women as supervisors. The survey showed even women get opportunity to work but it is still hard to get promoted. Women apply for a job harder than men and confront with gender discrimination.
Since the establishment of the roles of society, women have been entitled to feminine roles that focus on family and nurturing. This roles allows for the subordination of women in the workplace since it makes distinctions between ideological constraints between genders. This opens up for the construction of gendered processes, that focus on the placement of roles that only “women” are allowed to acquire because of their practices. The author makes the example of how the managers contribute to gender gap and placement of roles that do not allow for the advancement of women in an organization. Acker argued, “…the production of gender divisions.
It is a challenge for organizations to advance, maintain and promote talented women. A strategic combination of individual advancement and a foundational change in mind-set could be the solution, and additionally a survey and in some cases a confirmation of organizational culture. The entry of women in to leadership should be enhanced so as to change the states of mind and the culture of development industry to draw in more skilled leaders with diversity. Hence not just the development business or the other stakeholders who impact women’s career but also the women concerned should take the concern to defeat their own barriers for entry into leadership positions in management. The acknowledgement of ‘soft skills’ to women has both positive and negative ramifications for women.
When that resource, time, is being used to focus on gender verses productivity the company as a whole suffers. By achieving gender equality in the workplace, companies should start to see a significant amount of financial progression. According to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency, “It can also improve national productivity and economic growth” (WGEA). This statistic can make for a great motivator in the business world. Not only can removing the gender factor reduce the number of barriers associated with females, but it can show that a company is willing to give every employee an equal chance which can lead to attracting newer potential experienced employees of both genders.