These women are treated poorly and used to unexplainable and indescribable acts in order to keep their life. In a Newsweek article published in 1993, it stated the reputed crime boss, Guo Liang, aka Ah Kay, ordered to have two of his top Lieutenants killed. This phone conversation was talked by the FBI and used as evidence against Liang. This is just one of the techniques law enforcement uses as a tool to combat crimes the Fuk Ching gang commits. Also the FBI has also been using surveillance in determining other illegal activities the gang has been conducting.
They are starting to be released as an issue and some people are trying to stop them. The arrest of innocent people raises questions on the account of false witnesses ( Hezbollah). This shows things are being noticed and trying to change. One of these people is Justice Henry. Justice Henry says there needs to be substantial penalties for false witnesses (Ekert).
Just because law is set in place doesn’t make people follow it. “The basic rights that belong to every person” describes Human Rights. Examples such as the Civil Rights movement, World War II, and even North Korea, show that human right cannot be actualized for every person. A law set in place to protect these rights does not mean that everyone will follow it. Human Rights can only be actualized if everyone respects them and follows
The approach states that a human right is not qualified by any legal instrument or any institution. The moral theories focus on the universality of human rights despite our various backgrounds such as race, culture, religion or geographical boundaries. They further elaborate that human beings owe each other respect that cannot only be defined by international human rights instruments but by the fact that one is human. Jerome Shestack; in his paper ‘Philosophical foundations of Human rights’, explain theology as a source of human rights. He said that Theology states that human rights stem from a higher law than the state, The Supreme being.
It has gathered more importance after the Second World War period, after the United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. Human rights are moral principles, which describe certain standards of human behavior, and are protected as legal rights. They are applicable everywhere and at every time in the sense of being the same for everyone. They require empathy and impose an obligation on every person to respect the human rights of everyone around them. The confusing question for many of whether there’s a difference between human rights and women rights is answered differently between women and men.
The idea that human rights belong to everyone by sole fact of being human and that human rights are different from legal, conventional and moral rights is considered for orthodox human rights view. “Political conceptions” of human rights, as a challenge to this view and represented by John Rawles, Joseph Raz, Bernard Williams, Joshua Cohen and Charles Beitz, “reject the idea that human rights are rights that inhere to people simply by virtue of them sharing a common humanity, asserting that this approach disregards the distinctively political role of human rights” . Moral philosophers developed different concepts in order to prove their claims. For example, Rawls constructed the term “law of the peoples”. All people, no matter their religious, philosophical and moral background should be able to “agree freely on the set of principles and norms of which human rights are a part” .
The major obligation lies with the modern state while implementing the rights-based approach programmes as they are the recipients of aid. As participation is one of the fundamental principles of the rights-based approach, the state needs to make sure that the people who are underrepresented are involved and benefitted (Uvin, 2010). Since the state is held responsible for the well-being and welfare of its people it has an obligation in disbursing the funds followed by monitoring process in order to track if the human rights aspects are incorporated in the projects (Andrea, 2004). Also, if the rights-based approach needs to be taken seriously, then governments, national and international aid actors need to apply the rights-based approach to alleviate poverty more effectively in all of their actions and in the political economy of equality (Uvin, 2010). But this raise a question on which policies for poverty reductions are to be funded as there is still a debate on its definition.
Do you think that human rights should be seen as a universal or culturally-relative phenomenon? Human rights are the basic freedoms, protection and restrictions that belong to all human beings regardless of gender, nationality, religion, age or race. The question on whether human rights should be the same in all over the world or not has been raised ever since the United Nations established the Universal Declaration of Human Rights(UDCR) in 1948. The debate between the human rights universalists and relativists is still going on today and the clear conclusion can still be quite far away, but we are going to analyze them and decide whether which is the best way of looking at human rights. There are two ways that people see human rights; universal